SOCRATES: Steroid or Cyclosporine Removal After Transplantation Using Everolimus

June 13, 2013 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Prospective, Open-label, Controlled Multicenter Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of an Induction Regimen of Cyclosporine Micro Emulsion, Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) and Corticosteroids, Followed by Administration of Everolimus and Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS), With Either the Withdrawal of Cyclosporine Micro Emulsion or Corticosteroids in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of corticosteroid discontinuation versus cyclosporine micro emulsion discontinuation in recipients receiving reduced exposure cyclosporine micro emulsion and corticosteroids plus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) initially, changed to everolimus at 2 weeks post-transplant. These two groups will be compared to a third control group, who will receive treatment consisting of cyclosporine micro emulsion, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and steroids.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • NSW, Australia
        • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
      • NSW, Australia
        • Westmead Hospital
      • QLD, Australia
        • Princess Alexandra Hospital
      • Sale, Australia
        • Monash Medical Centre
      • Sale, Australia
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
      • VIC, Australia
        • Royal Melbourne Hospital
      • WA, Australia
        • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males and females aged 18-65 years inclusive.
  2. First time recipients of cadaveric, living unrelated or living related donor kidney transplants.
  3. Patients who are willing and able to participate in the study and from whom written informed consent has been obtained.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients who are recipients of multiple organ transplants, including more than one kidney, kidney and pancreas, or previous transplant with any organ other than kidney.
  2. Patients at high immunological risk of graft loss, indicated by peak PRA >50% or loss of a previous renal allograft within the first 6 months of transplantation due to acute rejection.
  3. Patients who have received an investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
  4. Presence of any severe allergy or hypersensitivity to drugs similar to everolimus (e.g. antibiotics such as Clindamycin)

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may applied

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Withdrawal

Every randomized patient in this group received

Day 1 - Day 14: cyclosporine as Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) 5 mg/kg twice daily (b.i.d.), dose adjusted to achieve C2 target of 1,500 ng/mL (range 1,400-1,600 ng/mL) + mycophenolate sodium (MPA)720 mg b.i.d. + methylprednisone/prednisone 500 mg intra-operatively, 250 mg on day 1, then 10-30 mg/day prednisone

Day 15 - Day 60: everolimus 1.5 mg b.i.d. to achieve target 6-10 ng/mL + cyclosporine decrease dose as per protocol guideline + MPA 720 mg b.i.d. until everolimus trough >6 ng/mL, then MPA was stopped + prednisone 10-30mg/day

Day 61 - Day 120: everolimus dose adjusted to achieve target 6-10 ng/mL + cyclosporine 25% dose reduction per fortnight, to be discontinued by day 120 as per protocol (or commence reduction by day 120 at discretion of investigator, to be completed within 2 months of commencement) + prednisone 10-30mg/day Day 121 - Month 36: everolimus dose adjusted to achieve target 8-12 ng/mL + prednisone 5-10 mg/day

Other Names:
  • Certican®
Other Names:
  • Neoral®
Other Names:
  • myfortic®
Experimental: Steroid Withdrawal

Every randomized patient in this group received

Day 1 -14: cyclosporine 5 mg/kg b.i.d., dose adjusted to achieve C2 target as per protocol + mycophenolate sodium (MPA) 720 mg b.i.d. + methylprednisone/prednisone 500 mg intra-operatively, 250 mg on day 1, then 10-30 mg prednisone per day

Day 15 - 60: everolimus 1.5 mg b.i.d. to achieve target 6-10 ng/mL + cyclosporine decrease dose as per protocol guideline + MPA 720 mg b.i.d. until everolimus trough >6 ng/mL, then MPA was stopped + prednisone 10-30mg per day

Day 61 - 120: Everolimus dose adjusted + cyclosporine adjust dose according protocol guideline (or commence reduction by day 120 at discretion of Investigator, to be completed within 2 months of commencement) + gradual withdrawal of prednisone by 1 mg/week to be discontinued by Day 120.

Day 121 - Month 36: At Day 121, Month 7 and Month 13 Everolimus dose was adjusted to achieve target 6-10 ng/mL + Cyclosporine adjust dose to achieve C2 target as per protocol

Other Names:
  • Certican®
Other Names:
  • Neoral®
Other Names:
  • myfortic®
Active Comparator: CNI+MPA+ Steroid

Patients randomized to this group received:

Day 1 - Month 36: cyclosporine 5 mg/kg b.i.d., dose adjusted to achieve the protocol defined C2 Targets + mycophenolate sodium 720mg b.i.d. + Methylprednisone/prednisone 500mg intra-operatively, 250mg on day 1, 10-30mg prednisone per day until month 12 (as per local practice), 5-10mg/day months 13-36.

Other Names:
  • Neoral®
Other Names:
  • myfortic®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) After Kidney Transplant to Evaluate Kidney Function (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated by the Nankivell formula: GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)^ 2 + C where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients.
At Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) After Kidney Transplant to Evaluate Kidney Function (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 24 and 36
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated by the Nankivell formula: GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)^ 2 + C where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients.
At Month 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Per Treatment Group (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
A biopsy-proven acute rejection is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.
At Month 12
Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Per Treatment Group (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36
A biopsy-proven acute rejection is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.
At Month 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Treatment Failure (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Month 12

Composite endpoint of treatment failure includes biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death and loss-to-follow-up. A BPAR is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.

The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss.

Month 12
Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Treatment Failure (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

Composite endpoint of treatment failure includes biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death and loss-to-follow-up. A BPAR is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III as per Banff 97 classification.

The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was the day of graft loss.

At Month 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Histological Evidence Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12

A per-protocol biopsy was performed at Baseline and Month 12 and read by an independent blinded pathologist in order to assess chronic allograft nephropathy. Chronic rejection is characterized by a slow progressive decline in renal function and is typically preceded by the histological picture of chronic allograft nephropathy. The presence of biopsy confirmed Grade I, II or III chronic allograft nephropathy by Banff 97 criteria was assessed on all optional biopsies obtained for clinical suspicion of chronic rejection.

Data summarized by 3 categories. "Yes" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN ; "No" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN and "Not Done" - Central protocol defined kidney allograft biopsies were not done.

At Month 12
Number of Participants With Histological Evidence Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 36

Chronic rejection is characterized by a slow progressive decline in renal function and is typically preceded by the histological picture of chronic allograft nephropathy. The presence of biopsy confirmed Grade I, II or III chronic allograft nephropathy by Banff 97 criteria was assessed on all optional biopsies obtained for clinical suspicion of chronic rejection.

Data summarized by 3 categories. "Yes" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN ; "No" - Patients with histological evidence of CAN and "Not Done" - Central protocol defined kidney allograft biopsies were not done.

At Month 36
Number of Participants With Sub Clinical Acute Rejection (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12

Based on Banff 97 criteria, sub clinical acute rejection can be:

GRADE IA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

GRADE IB - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

GRADE IIA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration and mild to moderate intimal arteritis (v1).

GRADE IIB - Cases with moderate to severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area (v2).

GRADE III - Cases with "transmural" arteritis or fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (v3).

"Borderline" category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of mild tubulitis (1 to 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section).

At Month 12
Number of Participants With Sub Clinical Acute Rejection (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 36

Based on Banff 97 criteria, sub clinical acute rejection can be:

GRADE IA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

GRADE IB - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).

GRADE IIA - Cases with significant interstitial infiltration and mild to moderate intimal arteritis (v1).

GRADE IIB - Cases with moderate to severe intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area (v2).

GRADE III - Cases with "transmural" arteritis or fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (v3).

"Borderline' category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of mild tubulitis (1 to 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section).

At Month 36
Mean Serum Creatinine (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
At Month 12
Mean Serum Creatinine (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 18, 24 and 36
At Month 12, 18, 24 and 36
Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) Calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault Formula (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12

Creatinine clearance were calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula:

CrCl (males) = (140-A) × BW/(72 × Cr) CrCl (females) = CrCl (males) × 0.85 where A is age [years], BW is body weight [kg], and Cr is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL].

The Cockcroft-Gault formula estimates creatinine clearance based on serum creatinine level, body weight, and age.

At Month 12
Creatinine Clearance Calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault Formula (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36

Creatinine clearance were calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula:

CrCl (males) = (140-A) × BW/(72 × Cr) CrCl (females) = CrCl (males) × 0.85 where A is age [years], BW is body weight [kg], and Cr is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL].

The Cockcroft-Gault formula estimates creatinine clearance based on serum creatinine level, body weight, and age.

At Month 12, 24 and 36
Mean Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (ACR) as Measurement of Proteinuria (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
Proteinuria is measured by spot morning urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio [ACR]. When the ACR is more than or equal to 30 mg/mmol then it is known as proteinuria.
At Month 12
Mean Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio [ACR] as Measurement of Proteinuria (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 18, 24 and 36
Proteinuria is measured by spot morning urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio [ACR]. When the ACR is more than or equal to 30 mg/mmol then it is known as proteinuria.
At Month 12, 18, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Post Transplant Diabetes Mellitus (PTDM) and Impaired Fasting Glucose (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12

The symptoms of post transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and impaired fasting glucose are defined as any of the following conditions:

  1. Patients receiving glucose lowering treatment
  2. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >= 126 mg/dL on 2 separate occasions
  3. Hemoglobin subtype A1c (HbA1c) > 6.5%
  4. Diabetes reported as treatment emergent AE with end date > Day 15
At Month 12
Number of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation (NODAT) and Impaired Fasting Glucose (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 36

The symptoms of new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) and impaired fasting glucose are defined as any of the following conditions:

  1. Patients receiving glucose lowering treatment
  2. 2 fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values >= 126 mg/dL or 2 random plasma glucose (RPG) values >= 200 mg/dL or FPG value >= 126 mg/dL and 1 RPG value >= 200 mg/dL
  3. Diabetes reported as treatment emergent AE with end date > Day 15
At Month 36
Number of Participants With Notable Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Baseline, Overall post-baseline up to 12 month

Notable abnormal systolic blood pressure is defined as :

  • Either an increase of >=30 that results in >=180 or >200 (mm/Hg)
  • OR a decrease of >=30 that results in <=90 or <75 (mm/Hg)from baseline

Notable abnormal diastolic blood pressure is defined as :

  • Either an increase of >=20 that results in >=105 or >115 (mm/Hg)
  • OR a decrease of >=20 that results in <=50 or <40 (mm/Hg) from baseline
Baseline, Overall post-baseline up to 12 month
Number of Participants With Notable Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Baseline, Overall post baseline up to Month 36

Notable abnormal systolic blood pressure is defined as :

  • Either an increase of >=30 that results in >=180 or >200 (mm/Hg)
  • OR a decrease of >=30 that results in <=90 or <75 (mm/Hg) from baseline

Notable abnormal diastolic blood pressure is defined as :

  • Either an increase of >=20 that results in >=105 or >115 (mm/Hg)
  • OR a decrease of >=20 that results in <=50 or <40 (mm/Hg) from baseline
Baseline, Overall post baseline up to Month 36
Number of Participants With Erythropoietin Usage (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Number of Participants With Erythropoietin Usage (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Month 36
Month 36
Mean Short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Score as a Measure of Quality of Life Assessment (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12

SF-36 measures impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). 36-item survey has 8 subscales. The 8 subscales are: Physical functioning (PF), Role-physical (RP), Bodily pain (BP), General health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social functioning (SF), Role-emotional (RE) and Mental health (MH).

Score for eash sub-scale has been standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL.

At Month 12
Mean Short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Score as a Measure of Quality of Life Assessment (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 24

SF-36 measures impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). 36-item survey has 8 subscales. The 8 subscales are : Physical functioning (PF), Role-physical (RP), Bodily pain (BP), General health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social functioning (SF), Role-emotional (RE) and Mental health (MH).

Score for each sub-scale has been standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL.

At Month 24
Number of Participants Hospitalized for Reasons Other Than Primary Transplantation (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Month 12
This analysis is reporting number of participants hospitalized for reasons (such as acute rejection, infection, gastrointestinal (GI) events, cardiovascular event, metabolic disorder and Other) other than primary transplantation.
Month 12
Number of Participants Hospitalized for Reasons Other Than Primary Transplantation (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Month 36
This analysis is reporting number of participants hospitalized for reasons (such as acute rejection, infection, gastrointestinal (GI) events, cardiovascular event, metabolic disorder and Other) other than primary transplantation.
Month 36
Number of Participants With Employment Status (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At screening (at day 0 +/- 7 days ), At Month 12

The various employment status reported are:

  • Employed/self employed full time
  • Employed part time
  • Unemployed
  • Homemaker
  • Volunteer
  • Permanently disabled
  • Non-permanently disable
  • Retired
  • Other
At screening (at day 0 +/- 7 days ), At Month 12
Number of Participants With Employment Status (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At screening (at day 0 +/- 7 days ), At Month 36

The various employment status reported are:

  • Employed/self employed full time
  • Employed part time
  • Unemployed
  • Homemaker
  • Volunteer
  • Permanently disabled
  • Non-permanently disable
  • Retired
  • Other
At screening (at day 0 +/- 7 days ), At Month 36
Number of Participants With Wound Problems(12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
Patients with any wound healing problem such as infection related to kidney surgery, dehiscence, lymphocele, hernia, seroma, hematoma, ureteral anastomotic complication and other were reported in this analysis.
At Month 12
Number of Participants With Any Wound Problems (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36
Patients with any wound healing problem such as infection related to kidney surgery, dehiscence, lymphocele, hernia, seroma, hematoma, ureteral anastomotic complication and other were reported in this analysis.
At Month 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Notable Abnormalities in Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Overall post baseline up to month 12

Notable abnormal total cholesterol is defined as : High: >= 9.1 mmol/L , normal range is 0.00 - 5.17 mmol/L

Notable abnormal triglycerides is defined as : High: >= 8.5 mmol/L, normal range is 0.30 - 2.00 mmol/L

Overall post baseline up to month 12
Number of Participants With Notable Abnormalities in Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides as Measurement of Effect of Treatment on Cardiovascular Health (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Overall Post Baseline up to month 36

Notable abnormal total cholesterol is defined as : High: >= 9.1 mmol/L , normal range is 0.00 - 5.17 mmol/L

Notable abnormal triglycerides is defined as : High: >= 8.5 mmol/L, normal range is 0.30 - 2.00 mmol/L

Overall Post Baseline up to month 36
Number of Participants With Antibody-mediated Rejection Per Treatment Group (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
At Month 12
Number of Participants With Antibody-mediated Rejection Per Treatment Group (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36
At Month 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Influenced by Demographic Characteristics and Morbidities (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
The influence of demographic characteristics and comorbidities on incidence of BPAR were analyzed in the following way: Demographic characteristics were age (<55 years, ≥55 years), Expanded criteria Donor (ECD) organ (donor age >60 years or donor non heart-beating and donor age >50), gender, living vs. deceased donor, Body Mass Index (BMI) classes (underweight <18.5, normal 18.5 - <25.0, overweight 25.0 - <30.0, obesity 30.0 and above), years on dialysis before transplantation (<1, 1-5, >5 years). Comorbidities were diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases/events, nephrosclerosis, glomerulonephritis/glomerular disease, polycystic disease, and Cytomegalovirus status.
At Month 12
Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Influenced by Demographic Characteristics and Morbidities (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 36
The influence of demographic characteristics and comorbidities on incidence of BPAR were analyzed in the following way: Demographic characteristics were age (<55 years, ≥55 years), Expanded Criteria Donor [ECD] organ (donor age >60 years or donor non heart-beating and donor age >50), gender, living vs. deceased donor, Body Mass Index (BMI) classes (underweight <18.5, normal 18.5 - <25.0, overweight 25.0 - <30.0, obesity 30.0 and above), years on dialysis before transplantation (<1, 1-5, >5 years). Comorbidities were diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases/events, nephrosclerosis, glomerulonephritis/glomerular disease, polycystic disease, and Cytomegalovirus status.
At Month 36
Number of Patient Survival and Graft Survival (12 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12
At Month 12
Number of Patient Survival and Graft Survival (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: At Month 12, 24 and 36
At Month 12, 24 and 36
Change in Bone Mineral Density Between Week 2 and Month 24 (36 Months Analysis)
Time Frame: Week 2, Month 24
Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) were done at Week 2 and Month 24. Change in BMD between week 2 and Month 24 were done for neck of femur and lumbar spine.
Week 2, Month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2013

Last Verified

June 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Transplanted Recipients

Clinical Trials on Everolimus (RAD001)

3
Subscribe