Tamsulosin for Urolithiasis in the Emergency Dept (STONE)

November 13, 2018 updated by: Andrew Meltzer

Study of Tamsulosin for Urolithiasis in the Emergency Department

Urolithiasis is a disease that effects 12% of the population and its incidence is growing. In the US there are over 1.1 million visits annually to Emergency Departments for renal colic. The disease is extremely painful, often requiring large amounts of narcotic analgesia, and results in lost work days. Moreover, up to 30% of patients may eventually require lithotripsy or surgical removal of the stone. Currently there are no medical interventions other than analgesia which are offered to patients.

Based on encouraging results from several small European clinical studies, the researchers hypothesize that the administration of tamsulosin to patients with symptomatic urolithiasis will enhance stone passage, and reduce both the time to recovery and the need for surgical intervention or lithotripsy. The researchers will conduct a study by identifying and recruiting patients presenting with urolithiasis in the emergency departments of four institutions.

A total of 500 consenting subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

  1. tamsulosin for a maximum of 28 days;
  2. placebo for a maximum of 28 days.

In addition, both groups will receive standard analgesic therapy.

The study team, which will be blinded to treatment status, will monitor each subject's clinical progress and outcome. The primary objectives of this study are:

  1. to determine if tamsulosin is effective, and
  2. to evaluate the safety of the therapy.

Another objective is to identify the most appropriate clinical subgroup(s) for treatment.

If the therapeutic benefits observed in smaller clinical studies are replicated, administration of these medications should produce several benefits, including:

  1. a reduction in time to pain free recovery and hence a more rapid return to employment;
  2. decreased requirements for narcotic analgesia;
  3. less need for urological out-patient clinic follow-up;
  4. decreased need for surgical intervention or lithotripsy; and
  5. substantial cost savings.

If this therapy is beneficial, it will represent a major advance in the treatment of urolithiasis. This objective is a major stated goal of the NIDDK (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) Clinical Urology Program, which has a stated mission to improve the treatment of urolithiasis.

Kidney stones are a major public health issue, and one person in eight will be affected by the disease. If the hypothesis is verified, the researchers will provide the first medical therapy ever for this disease. This therapy, if effective, will reduce the amount of time a patient is off work because of the pain from the disease, and may also reduce the need for expensive and time-consuming surgical treatments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

512

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
        • University of Alabama - Birmingham
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • The George Washington University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Evidence of ureterolithiasis (i.e. stone is located in ureter, not in bladder) as demonstrated on radiographic studies, specifically non-contrast spiral CT.
  3. Willingness to participate and able to proceed with standard outpatient management (no personal or job-related issues, e.g. airline pilot.
  4. Has a telephone in order to be contacted for follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient desiring or requiring immediate surgical intervention making then not a candidate for outpatient kidney stone management.
  2. Current urinary tract infection based on urine dipstick as admission and urgent procedural management are likely indicated.
  3. Known anatomical genitourinary abnormalities or prior Genitourinary surgeries.
  4. Positive pregnancy test making proper radiological imaging contraindicated.
  5. Breastfeeding mothers.
  6. History of hypersensitivity to tamsulosin.
  7. Current use of alpha blockers or calcium channel blockers.
  8. Current use of steroids which may have an independent effect on stone expulsion.
  9. Spontaneous stone expulsion prior to enrollment.
  10. Largest stone dimension ≥ 9mm assessed using radiologic imaging, being very unlikely to pass spontaneously.
  11. Presence of stone in the bladder.
  12. Current use of vardenafil which is tamsulosin contraindicated.
  13. Ipsilateral, transplanted or solitary kidney as hospitalization may be necessary.
  14. Known renal insufficiency.
  15. Fever defined as >101.5°F which may indicate infection.
  16. Floppy iris syndrome which is tamsulosin contraindicated.
  17. Planned cataract surgery in the next 60 days which is tamsulosin contraindicated.
  18. Prisoners /wards of state.
  19. Prior enrollment in STONE (Candidates who are screened and found ineligible may be rescreened at a later date.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tamsulosin
Tamsulosin 0.4mg PO qd for 28 days
tamsulosin 0.4mg po qd for 28 days
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo PO qd for 28 days
placebo po qd for 28 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients Passing Their Stone Within 28 Days by Self Report
Time Frame: 28 days
Hypothesis: The administration of tamsulosin after the clinical and radiographic diagnosis of acute urolithiasis will produce an increase in the proportion of patients passing their stone within 28 days.
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Any Pain Medication
Time Frame: 28 days
Patients on any pain medication at day 28
28 days
Need for Surgical Intervention
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Crossover to Open Label Tamsulosin
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Confirmation of Stone Passage on CT
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Return to Work (if Employed)
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew C Meltzer, MD, The George Washington University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

September 29, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe