Media Literacy to Prevent Adolescent Smoking

July 24, 2017 updated by: Brian Primack, University of Pittsburgh
The purpose of this project is to determine if a 3-session anti-smoking media literacy based intervention is more effective that a standard 3-session anti-smoking media literacy intervention at changing students' intention to smoke, actual smoking behavior, attitudes and norms regarding smoking, and level of media literacy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cigarette smoking is the top cause of preventable death and disease in the U.S., and about 90% of those who die from smoking begin as adolescents. Because smoking-related mass media messages (such as episodes of smoking in films and advertisements) significantly increase adolescent smoking, media literacy, defined as analysis and evaluation of mass media messages, presents a promising new framework for development of innovative school-based tobacco control programs. Media literacy may be more effective than standard tobacco education among the populations that are at greatest risk for smoking, such as African-Americans and the socio-economically disadvantaged, and national organizations have called for use of media literacy to reduce smoking. However, anti-smoking media literacy programs have been neither widely implemented nor well-evaluated.

The aims of this project are to determine if a theory-driven, school-based, 3-session anti-smoking media literacy curriculum delivered to 9th grade students can affect clinically relevant factors mediating adolescent smoking according to the widely accepted Theory of Reasoned Action: intention to smoke, smoking behavior, attitude toward smoking, and norms involving smoking. It is hypothesized that, compared with those exposed to a currently accepted school-based smoking prevention program, students exposed to the media literacy program will develop more negative attitudes toward smoking, a more negative sense of smoking norms, less intention to smoke, and less smoking. We also expect that the curriculum will improve smoking media literacy scores as measured by a reliable, valid scale.

Over two years, eight high schools will be recruited to randomize all 9th grade health classrooms to receive either the 3-session media literacy anti-smoking curriculum or a currently accepted anti-smoking program of equivalent length. This recruitment will occur via two prominent community organizations responsible for anti-tobacco programming in 50 local school districts. Experienced health educators will be trained in implementation of both experimental and control curricula. Outcome measures, demographic data, and other important covariates will be collected by a questionnaire given three times: at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and after one year. Questionnaire items are reliable, valid, and pilot-tested. Process evaluation will be conducted to assess implementation fidelity, to confirm or refute the findings of the quantitative assessment, to help explain outcome data, to refine the intervention, and to inform future replications of the curriculum.

Given the substantial nationwide morbidity and mortality due to tobacco use, the role of mass media messages in adolescent initiation of smoking, and the potential power of media literacy as an agent for health behavior change, it is essential to study the utility of media literacy in altering smoking behaviors and antecedents in this age group. If media literacy programs are successful in buffering the impact of mass media on adolescent smoking, similar interventions can be developed to prevent other harmful behaviors related to mass media messages.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1211

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • McKeesport, Pennsylvania, United States, 15132
        • McKeesport High School
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15210
        • Carrick High School
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Schenley High School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • High school student enrolled in health class at participating schools
  • Must be able to use computer interface for submission of data

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child does not wish to participate
  • Parent does not wish child to participate
  • Less than 13 or more than 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Students receive standard anti-tobacco education
Standard anti-tobacco programming
Experimental: Media Literacy
Students receive media literacy based anti-smoking education
Anti-smoking media literacy curriculum intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Susceptibility to smoking (Pierce, 1996)
Time Frame: Immediate, Delayed
Immediate, Delayed
Current smoking (last 30 days)
Time Frame: Delayed (one year)
Delayed (one year)
Smoking media literacy
Time Frame: Immediate, delayed (one year)
Immediate, delayed (one year)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Attitudes toward smoking
Time Frame: Immediate, delayed (one year)
Immediate, delayed (one year)
Subjective normative beliefs involving smoking
Time Frame: Immediate, delayed (one year)
Immediate, delayed (one year)
Implementation fidelity
Time Frame: Immediate
Immediate
Feasibility/acceptability of program
Time Frame: Immediate, delayed (one year)
Immediate, delayed (one year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian A Primack, MD, EdM, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 57407

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smoking Status

Clinical Trials on Control

3
Subscribe