Structuring the Integration of Care Management Services For Medicaid Enrollees Recipients With Chronic Illness, Substance Abuse Problems and Possible Psychiatric Disorders

December 5, 2017 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Structuring the Integration of Services For Medicaid Recipients With Chronic Illness, Substance Abuse Problems and Possible Psychiatric Disorders

The study seeks to measure the effect of increased coordination of care on medical costs, treatment utilization and selected clinical indicators among a Medicaid population with chronic medical conditions and substance abuse problems? We shall address this question by conducting a demonstration project consisting of the provision of integrated care management (somatic and behavioral) to Medicaid enrollees living on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and who have both chronic medical conditions and problems with substance abuse. A specific component of the study will be the participation of Maryland's Mental Health Administration (MHA) and MAPS, the administrator of psychiatric services for the Medicaid enrollees in Maryland. We shall compare the results of the integrated care management for the study sample on the Eastern Shore with a control group from the counties of western Maryland.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Problem in context. In an environment of increased competition for governmental funding, Medicaid programs in every state are bracing for decreased resources being available for the care of their enrollees. A possible result of less funding is reduced quality of healthcare. In response to this threat, The Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc, (CHCS) a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the quality of publicly financed health care, issued an RFP for participation in a multisite project to expand or enhance existing efforts to improve the way care for Medicaid enrollees with multiple chronic conditions is delivered, integrated, measured and financed.

Present knowledge. While there is strong documentation of improved population health status with care management, the evidence for the immediate economic effects of care management initiatives is mixed for commercial and absent for Medicaid populations. CHCS is presently conducting a multisite study (in which we participate) of whether or not a business case (return on investment) can be made for quality improvement initiatives in a Medicaid population.

Research question. What is the effect of increased coordination of care on medical costs, treatment utilization and selected clinical indicators among a Medicaid population with chronic medical conditions and substance abuse problems? We shall address this question by conducting a demonstration project consisting of the provision of integrated care management (somatic and behavioral) to Medicaid enrollees living on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and who have both chronic medical conditions and problems with substance abuse. A specific component of the study will be the participation of Maryland's Mental Health Administration (MHA) and MAPS, the administrator of psychiatric services for the Medicaid enrollees in Maryland. We shall compare the results of the integrated care management for the study sample on the Eastern Shore with a control group from the counties of western Maryland.

The primary goal of the project will be to improve the coordination of medical, substance abuse and mental health services for a group of Medicaid beneficiaries with chronic medical conditions. We hypothesize that the recipients of integrated care management (on the Eastern Shore) will have lower total medical costs (pharmacy, inpatient and outpatient), higher utilization of mental health and substance abuse services and lower use of emergency department services than those who received customary care (in western Maryland).

The secondary goal of this project will be to assist in the further development and piloting of information systems within MHA that will facilitate sharing of clinical information necessary for the coordination of behavioral (mental health and substance abuse) and medical care management between a Medicaid MCO (JHHC's PPMCO) and the mental health carve-out ASO, MAPS-MD. The outcome measurement for the secondary objective will be the extent to which an information system for coordination of care and population based queries has been established within MHA and is, with proper oversight by MHA, accessible to responsible entities.

Significance. The project targets a vulnerable population within Medicaid enrollees that are challenged when accessing care and are responsible for high total medical costs. The results of the project should be helpful to other the MCOs in Maryland's Health Partners, as well as to states with similar Medicaid systems as they seek to provide integrated healthcare services to their populations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

258

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States, 21060
        • Johns Hopkins HealthCare LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

We determined the size of the quality improvement initiative sample by the case management resources available at JHHC. Without adding personnel, the maximum number of new cases that can be assumed by the 3.5 (FTE) JHHC case managers for the Eastern Shore is 130.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 21 years of age or older;
  2. Resident of one of the following Maryland counties: Caroline, Cecil, Kent, Queen Anne's, Talbot, Dorchester, Somerset, Wicomico, Worcester, Allegheny, Frederick, Garrett, Washington, Calvert, Charles, or St. Mary's; or
  3. Chronic medical condition(s) identified by ACG Case Mix software (e.g. an ACG score => 0.10) as likely to incur high costs in the following year; and
  4. Substance use problem in the past 27 months as indicated by an ICD-9 code or CPT code on DHMH list for Special Needs Population.

Exclusion Criterion.

1) Enrolled in or eligible for enrollment in a Special Needs disease management program at JHHC: HIV/AIDS, Partners with Mom, Omega Life. It is necessary to exclude these programs because PPMCO members are already receiving intensive care management.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Quality Improvement Initiative
The initial step in the quality improvement initiative was a letter sent from JHHC Care Management Department to the quality improvement initiative group, inviting them to take advantage of the case management services that are part of their current benefits in the Priority Partners MCO. It is similar to the standard letter sent to PPMCO members who are appropriate for a JHHC disease or case management program. A substance abuse outreach staff initiated telephonic contact with the members in the intervention group. The staff member then refered to substance abuse treatment when possible and appropriate and refered to medical case management.
Control group
No additional improvement modalities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total medical costs (per member per month)
Time Frame: monthly average, calculated at the end of 12 months
monthly average, calculated at the end of 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter J Fagan, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Illness

3
Subscribe