The Efficacy of Phosphatidylserine-Omega3 in Elderly With Age Associated Memory Impairment

January 3, 2010 updated by: Enzymotec

A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of Phosphatidylserine-Omega3 in Elderly With Age Associated Memory Impairment

The primary objective of this trial is to assess the ability of an oral administration of Phosphatidylserine-Omega3 to improve attention and memory complaints in comparison to placebo in age associated memory impaired subjects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

157

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
        • The Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Neurology department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ability to give written informed consent
  2. Age: 90≥ years ≥50
  3. Gender: male and female
  4. CDR ≤ 0.5
  5. Complaints of memory loss reflected in such everyday problems as difficulty remembering names of individuals following introduction, misplacing objects, difficulty remembering multiple items to be purchased or multiple tasks to be performed, difficulty remembering telephone numbers or zip codes, and difficulty recalling information quickly or following distraction. Onset of memory loss must be described as gradual, without sudden worsening in recent months. Complaints of memory loss to be assessed by the MAC-Q scale.
  6. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥27 for subjects with college education (BA) and ≥ 26 for all others
  7. Memory test performance that is at least 1 SD below the mean established for young adults on at least one neuropsychological subtest of NexAde.
  8. Language: Subjects must be able to read, write and speak Hebrew.
  9. Ability to perform tests and interviews

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence of delirium, confusion, or other disturbances of consciousness
  2. Any Neurological disorder that could produce cognitive deterioration. Such disorders include AD, Parkinson's disease, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, local brain lesions including tumors, and normal pressure hydrocephalus
  3. History of any infective or inflammatory brain disease including those of viral, fungal, or syphilitic etiologies
  4. Evidence of significant cerebral vascular pathology
  5. Head injury immediately preceding cognitive deterioration.
  6. Current psychiatric diagnosis according to DSM IV criteria of depression, mania, or any other major psychiatric disorder
  7. Current diagnosis or history of alcoholism or drug dependence.
  8. Evidence of depression as determined by the Geriatric Depression Scale (short version) score of 5 or more.
  9. Any medical disorder that could produce cognitive deterioration including renal, respiratory, cardiac, and hepatic disease, diabetes mellitus, endocrine, metabolic or hematological disturbances unless well controlled, and malignancy not in remission for more than two years
  10. Use of psychotropic drug or any other drug or supplement that may significantly affect cognitive functioning during the month prior to psychometric testing.
  11. Use of any experimental medication within 1 month prior to screening or as concomitant medications.
  12. Subject has a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to fish or fish oil or soy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PS-Omega3
Phosphatidylserine-Omega3, 300mg/day 15 wk
Phosphatidylserine-Omega3 capsules 3x100mg/day 15 wk. Next, follow up phase, open label,1x100mg/day, 15 wk
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Cellulose tainted with fishy odor, 3 capsules/day
Placebo cellulose tainted with fishy odor capsules 3x100mg/day 15 wk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: baseline, 15 wk
A widely used, brief, easy to understand scale to evaluate verbal learning and memory. The score is presented as the number of words correctly recalled (0 is worse, 15 is best).The total learning task score ranges from 0 to 45 words(0 is worse, 45 is best).
baseline, 15 wk

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Work
Time Frame: baseline,15 wk
baseline,15 wk
Trail Making Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 weeks
Baseline, 15 weeks
Computerized Cognitive Assessment Tool
Time Frame: baseline, 15 weeks
baseline, 15 weeks
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)Scale
Time Frame: 7 weeks, 15 weeks
The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)scale is designed to record the clinician's global impression of change. Global improvement score ranges from 1 = "Very much improved", through 4 = "No change", to 7 = "Very much worse". Participants who experienced an improvement (scores 1, 2 or 3) in at least one of the two visits (following 7 or 15 weeks of treatment) were classified as improved over the treatment period (with the exception of participants reporting improvement following 7 weeks and deterioration at endpoint, who were NOT rated as improved)
7 weeks, 15 weeks
Change From Baseline in Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Time Frame: baseline, 15 weeks
A widely used neuropsychological tool for the evaluation of visuospatial constructional ability and visual memory. Both the time to complete the task (copy time)and the accuracy (immediate and delayed recall) were used as measures for the analysis. Accuracy range score is 0-36 points (0 is worse, 36 is best). Copy time is expressed in seconds (less time to copy indicates better performance).
baseline, 15 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amos Korczyn, MD, Sourasky Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2010

Last Verified

January 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Memory_PS 001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age Associated Memory Impairment

Clinical Trials on PS-Omega3

Subscribe