Will CPAP Reduce Length Of Respiratory Support In Premature Infants? (OLIVIA)

February 8, 2012 updated by: Rebecca Sherlock, Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia

Offering Less Invasive Ventilation in Infants Born 28 to 32 Weeks Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

In Canada each year, there are approximately 800 infants born between 28 and 32 weeks gestation. Up to 60% of these infants will require breathing tube placement for Respiratory Distress Syndrome or RDS. RDS is a lung disease of prematurity due to a lack of a compound called surfactant. The breathing tube is placed as a conduit for placing surfactant into the babies' lungs to improve the lung disease. Most babies are then placed on a breathing machine or ventilator. Ventilation is not without harm and can be associated with lung damage, delays in feeding, increased hospital stay and interruption of bonding. An alternative that does not require the presence of a breathing tube is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). We will randomize babies to either ventilation or CPAP to try to minimize the length of time the baby is kept on respiratory support.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives: To determine whether infants 28 to 32 weeks gestational age with RDS treated with surfactant followed by CPAP have a shorter length of respiratory support (length of time on a ventilator and CPAP) than similar infants who are treated with MV after surfactant therapy; and to examine secondary outcomes including outcomes related to lung disease, feeding issues and hospital length of stay (secondary outcomes).

Hypothesis: The use of CPAP after surfactant in infants born 28 to 32 weeks with RDS will reduce the length of respiratory support as compared with infants treated with MV. We hypothesize that the incidence of lung disease and feeding issues will be similar between groups while length of hospital stay will be shorter in the CPAP group.

Methods: A multi-center, randomized trial conducted in seven neonatal intensive care units in Canada and France. Parents will be approached for consent prior to delivery or after the infant shows signs of RDS. Infants 28 to 32 weeks gestation with RDS will be eligible for the study. After intubation and surfactant administration, babies will be randomized to either receive CPAP or MV. Strict criteria for CPAP failure, weaning ventilation and weaning and discontinuing CPAP will be specified. Infants will be followed in the nursery until hospital discharge or until all outcomes have been determined.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • The Royal Alexandra Hspital
    • British Columbia
      • New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
        • The Royal Columbian Hospital
      • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3L3W7
        • Surrey Memorial Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H3V4
        • Children's and Women's Health Centre of BC
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
        • Victoria General Hospital
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • The Ottawa Hospital-General Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 7 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants born greater than or equal to 28 weeks (28+0) and less than 32 weeks (31+6) gestation admitted to the NICU at a participating center
  2. Diagnosis of RDS in the first 24 hours of life requiring intubation for surfactant administration by any combination of the following: Classic clinical signs of RDS include tachypnea, moderate to severe intercostal and subcostal retractions, grunting respirations and oxygen needs of >0.30 and/or on CPAP of 5 to 6 H2O cm and/or radiographic signs of RDS including low lung volumes, a reticular-granular pattern of lung infiltrates and air bronchograms. A chest radiograph is not a mandatory criterion for the diagnosis of RDS if clinical signs are present
  3. Parental consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants with a major congenital anomaly
  2. Infants with pulmonary hypoplasia; 3. Infants known or suspected to have a neuromuscular disorder;
  3. Infants from mothers that had greater than 2 weeks ruptured membranes.
  4. Infants that had vigourous resuscitation including chest compressions and cardiac meds.
  5. No parental consent obtained.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2
CPAP
CPAP administered via "Bubble" method or Infant Flow Driver
Active Comparator: 1
Mechanical ventilation
Volume guarantee strategy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of respiratory support
Time Frame: Variable
CPAP plus MV days
Variable

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Duration of ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, pneumothorax rate and BPD by Walsh test, time to full feeds, time to regain birthweight, necrotizing enterocolitis, time to discharge, achievement of readiness for discharge criteria
Time Frame: Variable
Variable

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca L Sherlock, MD, FRCPC, PhD(c), Children's and Women's Health Centre of BC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 14, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Clinical Trials on Mechanical ventilation

3
Subscribe