Comparison of Lens Care Regimens With a Silicone Hydrogel Lens (Emerald)

August 20, 2010 updated by: University of Waterloo
The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare, on a daily wear basis, the performance of two contact lens care solutions when used with silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses with regards to comfort and dryness symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to evaluate and compare, on a daily wear basis, the performance of two contact lens care solutions when used with silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses with regards to comfort and dryness symptoms by observing changes within the cornea and collecting subjective ratings

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L3G1
        • Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:

  1. Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
  2. Has read, understood and signed an information consent letter.
  3. Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
  4. Is presently using either bi-weekly or monthly replacement lenses.
  5. Has symptoms of ocular dryness as determined by specific pre-screening criteria.
  6. Is correctable to a visual acuity of 6/9 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction.
  7. Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease.
  8. Has had an ocular examination in the last two years.

Exclusion Criteria:

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:

  1. Is an asymptomatic lens wearer.
  2. Is a daily disposable contact lens wearer.
  3. Is a current extended wear contact lens wearer.
  4. Currently uses one of the study lens care regimens.
  5. Has any clinically significant blepharitis.
  6. Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
  7. Is aphakic.
  8. Has any active ocular disease.
  9. Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
  10. Is using any systemic or topical medications that may affect ocular health.
  11. Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study.
  12. Is participating in any other type of clinical or research study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2
contact lens care system
Active Comparator: 1
contact lens care system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
High Contrast Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 2 weeks

High Contrast Visual Acuity with contact lenses, was measured using standardized and computer generated logMAR chart.

10 Sloan letters adopted. VA chart's target size varied from logMAR 1.0 to -0.40 in 0.1 logMAR step.

2 weeks
Low Contrast Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 2 weeks

Low Contrast Visual Acuity with contact lenses, was measured using standardized and computer generated logMAR chart.

10 Sloan letters adopted. VA chart's target size varied from logMAR 1.0 to -0.40 in 0.1 logMAR step.

2 weeks
In-vivo Wettability
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Pre-lens non-invasive tear breakup time
2 weeks
Subjective Comfort Rating
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Numeric rating scale was administered. Comfort ratings (0 - 100), 0 = Very poor comfort and 100 = Excellent comfort.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Desmond Fonn, M. Optom, University of Waterloo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 24, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2010

Last Verified

August 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P/265/07/L

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on ClearCare

Subscribe