Coping Compliance and Adjustment in Adolescents With Cystic Fibrosis

November 23, 2009 updated by: Akron Children's Hospital
In this research, we will use established surveys to look at the relationship between various styles of coping with a disease, religious coping styles, treatment compliance, locus of control, broad measures of mental health and adjustment, and basic health data (e.g., PFTs, recent hospitalizations or antibiotics within the past year, lung microbiology, CFTR mutations, and co-morbid conditions such as diabetes, depression, and liver disease). While the research is correlational, it should suggest relationships (both positive and negative) between various coping styles and desired outcomes (compliance and well-being).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

OVERVIEW: We anticipate that the data we collect will help us better understand some of the factors associated with improved coping, treatment compliance, and emotional adjustment, which, in turn, may suggest possible interventions to improve compliance, emotional adjustment, and general physical health. Specific hypotheses include the following:

  1. Subjects who score high on measures of positive coping will have greater levels of treatment compliance and psychological well-being.
  2. Subjects who score high on measures of negative coping will have lower levels of treatment compliance and psychological well-being.
  3. Subjects who score high on measures of positive religious coping will have greater levels of treatment compliance and psychological well being.
  4. Subjects who score high on measures of negative religious coping will have lower levels of treatment compliance and psychological well-being.
  5. Subjects who score high on measures of internal locus of control will have higher levels of treatment compliance and psychological well-being compared to subjects who score low on measures of internal locus of control.
  6. Subjects who score high on measures of treatment compliance will have higher levels of physical health.
  7. We do not anticipate a positive correlation between positive coping mechanisms and general physical health; however, subjects who score high on measures of negative coping may have lower levels of general physical health (e.g., lower PFTs, increased rates and lengths of hospitalizations) probably due to third variables (e.g., if someone uses denial as a coping mechanism, it may lead to poor treatment compliance, which may lead to declines in physical health).
  8. Anecdotal evidence suggests that parental education may be positively correlated with treatment compliance, but this has not been evaluated. Likewise, anecdotal evidence suggest that marital status may be correlated with treatment compliance (probably because of third variables, e.g., if, as much research suggests, divorce is related to lower SES and fewer social supports, these factors may in turn interfere with treatment compliance). Two questions on the demographic sheet will allow us to explore whether or not this may be worth exploring further.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44308
        • Akron Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adolescents age 13-19 with CF at a single CF center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cystic fibrosis age 13-19 yrs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acutely ill

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1
Adolescents with CF.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Multiple measures of coping strategies in adolescents with cystic fibrosis.
Time Frame: Single visit
Single visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Coping startegies will be correlated with measures of clinical illness.
Time Frame: Single visit
Single visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathan C Kraynack, MD, Akron Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2009

Last Verified

November 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

3
Subscribe