Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Oxygen Venturi in Acute Respiratory Failure in CAP: CAPOVeRSO (CAPOVeRSO)

October 26, 2009 updated by: University of Milan

A Comparison of CPAP Delivered by Helmet and O2 Therapy With Venturi Mask for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Community-acquired Pneumonia

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of CPAP application by a helmet and O2 administration by a Venturi mask in terms of gas exchanges improvement in patients with acute respiratory failure due to community-acquired pneumonia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the commonest causes of hospitalised acute respiratory failure with a mortality rate up t 30%.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has ben recently proved to be effective. To date, however, no prospective randomised study has been published on the comparison between CPAP and O2 administration via a Venturi mask for the treatment of acute respiratory failure in immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of CPAP delivered by a helmet and O2 administration via a Venturi mask in terms of gas exchanges improvement in early acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 between 210 and 285)due to community-acquired pneumonia.

A Steering Committee composed by the principal investigators will request an interim analysis at 20% enrolment in order to monitor the criteria for equipoise of the two treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20122
        • Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) defined as: new chest x-ray pulmonary infiltrate, fever, and respiratory symptoms
  • Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory failure
  • Respiratory Rate < 35 breaths/min
  • PaO2/FiO2 > 200 and < 300 while breathing oxygen for at least 15 minutes via a Venturi mask with FiO2 0.5

Exclusion criteria

  • Immunosuppression
  • acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • Patients belonging to Class II-III-IV of the NYHA
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Acute Respiratory Acidosis pH < 7.35 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg
  • More than 3 acute organ failures
  • Systolic Pressure < 90 mmHg under fluid resuscitation or vasopressor drug use
  • Seizures
  • Decreased level of consciousness (GCS <12)
  • Inability to clear secretions
  • Pre-defined intubation criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
CPAP delivered by a helmet
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure delivered by a helmet with PEEP valve of 10 cmH2O and FiO2 0.5
Other Names:
  • Castar Starmed CP209/2
No Intervention: 2
O2 administration via a conventional Venturi mask

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to Reach an Improvement in Terms of Gas Exchange, Defined as a PaO2/FiO2 Ratio ≥315
Time Frame: on admission and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours until PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥315
on admission and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours until PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥315

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Mantainance
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours
the number of subjects who could maintain, once reached, a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥315 at 1 and 24 hours after the qualifying measurement
1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Roberto Cosentini, MD, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Mangiagalli e Regina Elena

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2009

Last Verified

October 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe