A Patient Handling Study of Mometasone Furoate/Formortoral Fumarate (MF/F) Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) With an Integrated Dose Counter in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Study P04703AM1)

May 8, 2024 updated by: Organon and Co

An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Patient Handling Study of Mometasone Furoate/Formoterol Fumarate MDI With an Integrated Dose Counter in Adolescent and Adult Subjects and Adult With Asthma or COPD

This was an open-label, multiple-dose, study of mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate (MF/F) metered dose inhaler (MDI) 100/10 micrograms (mcg) twice daily (BID) (2 puffs of MF/F MDI 50/5 mcg, administered twice a day approximately 12 hours apart) in participants 12 years of age or older, with a diagnosis of persistent asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) of at least 12 months. The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of the MF/F MDI integrated dose counter under normal patient handling conditions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

272

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Diagnosis and Criteria for Inclusion:

  • A participant must have been at least 12 years of age, of either sex, and of any race, with a diagnosis of persistent asthma or COPD of at least 12 months.
  • A participant must have been able to demonstrate correct use of an MDI without a counter at the Screening Visit.
  • A participant must have demonstrated at least 90% compliance with completion of the e-diary, use of the counterstrip, and use of the study medication over the 2-week Screening Period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with a serious uncontrolled medical disorder, which in the judgment of the investigator, could have interfered with the study, or required treatment which might interfere with the study.
  • Participants who in the judgment of the investigator and/or sponsor had a significant recent or current, repetitive strain injury (RSI) that may have impacted their ability to effectively participate in the full duration of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID with dose counter
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID with an integrated dose counter (administered as two inhalations of MFF MDI 50/5 mcg, twice a day) over a 4-week Treatment Period.
MF/F MDI 100/10 mcg BID with an integrated dose counter (administered as two inhalations of MF/F MDI 50/5 mcg, twice a day) over a 4-week Treatment Period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Discrepancy Rate
Time Frame: 4-week Treatment Period
Overall discrepancies refer to the difference between the participant-recorded number of actuations and the participant-recorded dose counter readout across the 4-week Treatment Period. The Overall Discrepancy Rate was calculated as 100 multiplied by the total number of discrepancies across all participants who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations divided by the total number of actuations in the same participant population (Completer Population).
4-week Treatment Period
Overall Quartile Discrepancy Rate
Time Frame: 4-week Treatment Period

Quartile discrepancies refer to the difference between

the participant-recorded number of actuations and the participant-recorded

counter readout at each of the 4 weekly visit intervals [ie, quartiles] to

evaluate whether there was any difference in agreement over the life of

the inhaler. The Quartile Discrepancy Rate was calculated as 100 multiplied by the total number of discrepancies per Quartile across all participant who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations divided by the total number of actuations per Quartile in the same population.

4-week Treatment Period
Overall Discrepancy Size
Time Frame: 4-week Treatment Period
Discrepancy Size refers to the magnitude of the discrepancy between the dose counter readout and the number of recorded actuations (definition of discrepancy). Overall Discrepancy Size was calculated as 100 multiplied by the sum of the absolute values from each Dose Counter Discrepancy Size across all participants who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations divided by the total number of recorded actuations in the same participant population.
4-week Treatment Period
End of Use Agreement: Number of Inhalers With an End of Use Agreement of 0 (Completer Population)
Time Frame: 4-week Treatment Period
The difference in the final MDI dose counter readout and the total number of recorded actuations at the end-of-use. Dose Counter end-of-use agreement was calculated as the sum of the absolute difference between the final dose counter readout and the number of recorded actuations across all participants who used at least 90% of the labeled actuations (excluding participants who used the inhaler beyond the labeled number of actuations) divided by the total number of participants in this population. No participant used more than two inhalers during the treatment period.
4-week Treatment Period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

January 30, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe