Comparison of 2 Vials of Components of a Synthetic Geranium Oil

December 17, 2015 updated by: Frank Greenway, Pennington Biomedical Research Center

EPT 101: New Geranium Oil Formulation for the Treatment of Neuropathy Pain

The purpose of this study is to determine which component of an artificial geranium oil helps to reduce your neuropathy pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

EPT 101 is a double-blind successive crossover study designed to determine which components of a synthetic geranium oil provide analgesic relief, with the objective of identifying and purifying the active substance. This is not a hypothesis-generating trial, nor is it confirming a hypothesis. The trial uses human volunteers in an efficacy-directed decomposition of a complex mixture.

Patients with a diagnosis of neuralgia or neuropathy who respond to geranium oil will test two vials of components of a synthetic geranium oil for application to the maximally painful area in succession. They will treat their condition in the clinic and fill out a patient diary on separate days. The primary objective is the patient opinion of which vial has greatest analgesic efficacy. Efficacy will be measured primarily by reduction in pain intensity summed over the first two hours, compared with the pain intensity during the 30 minutes preceding application.

Following the comparison of the first two vials, the vial judged efficacious will be decomposed into two further vials and the patients will repeat the evaluation described above. At least eight pair-wise comparisons will be required to determine and confirm which of the 100+ ingredients of a synthetic geranium oil are analgesic, provided there is only one such ingredient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70808
        • Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • You are eligible to participate in this study if you have completed the study EPT 100 and geranium oil relieves your neuropathy pain successfully.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • You are ineligible to participate in this study if you have completed the study EPT 100 and geranium oil does not relieve your neuropathy pain successfully

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1 Geranium Oil
2 applications of topical oil per week for 2 weeks
Active Comparator: 2 Geramium Oil
2 applications of topical oil per week for 2 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain relief
Time Frame: 2 hrs. post-application
2 hrs. post-application

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Response to therapy at one hour, defined as reduction of pain summed over the first hour, compared between the two oils.
Time Frame: 1 hr. post-application
1 hr. post-application

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frank Greenway, MD, Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe