Pre-shock Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation to Patients With Out-of-hospital Resuscitation, A Randomised Clinical Trial (CPR)

January 2, 2012 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Does Longer Pre-shock Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improve the Outcome of Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest? A Randomized Control Trial.

  1. Pre-shock cardiopulmonary resuscitation might benefit the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac patients with ventricular fibrillation / ventricular tachycardia in a post-hoc analysis of a prehospital trial conducted in Europe (L.Wik,2002). However, it's effectiveness in the Asian countries, where most firstly recorded rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests patients were asystole/pulseless electric activity rather than ventricular fibrillation / ventricular tachycardia, were not explored yet.
  2. This trial was designed to exam if pre-shock cardiopulmonary resuscitation by emergency medical technicians improves the outcome of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an Asian metropolitan city.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. Different from data from the Western countries, non-shockable rhythm (Asystole/pulseless electric activity) was responsible for most out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients(80%~90%) in metropolitan Taipei.
  2. Response time in Taipei emergency medical service was longer than 5 minutes.
  3. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rate were relatively low in Taipei.
  4. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is the only known method to save out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with asystole/pulseless electric activity. For those suffered from ventricular fibrillation/ ventricular tachycardia,previous studies revealed pre-shock cardiopulmonary resuscitation may have the potential to improve the outcome.
  5. Study hypothesis: Compared with current standard resuscitative sequence (basic life support protocol in Guideline 2005), longer pre-shock cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided to all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Taipei may improve the outcome of them.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1666

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Trauma
  • Age < 18y/o
  • Airway obstruction
  • Submersion
  • Sign of obvious death
  • existing do not resuscitate (DNAR) order
  • family refusal
  • preceding CPR by BLS teams for longer than 2 minutes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CPR first
Compression First (CF)
10 cycles of 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation before rhythm analysis by AED
Other Names:
  • automatic external defibrillator
Active Comparator: Analysis First
Rhythm analysis first
Rhythm analysis as soon as AED is ready
Other Names:
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • automatic external defibrillator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sustained ROSC >= 2 hours
Time Frame: 180 days
180 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
surival to ICU admission
Time Frame: 180 days
180 days
survival to hospital discharge
Time Frame: 180 days
180 days
Rates of good neurology recovery (CPC 1 &2)
Time Frame: 180 days
180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, MD, PHD, Department of Emergency Medicine, NTUH.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 200710019R
  • NSC 962314B002018

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Subscribe