A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder (ARIES)

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

The study is intended to test the efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Urinary Bladder, Overactive
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Mirabegron

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 2149
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • British Columbia
    • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3V 1N1
    • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8T 5G1
  • New Brunswick
    • St Johns, New Brunswick, Canada, E2L 3J8
  • Ontario
    • Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4M 7G1
    • Brampton, Ontario, Canada, L6T 4S5
    • Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, N2N 2B9
    • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, L3X 1W1
    • North Bay, Ontario, Canada, P1B 7K8
    • Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1H 1B9
    • Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada, M4K 2J1
    • Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, P7E 6E7
    • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
    • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
    • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6S 4W4
  • Quebec
    • Granby, Quebec, Canada, J2G 8Z9
    • Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada, H9R 4S3
• United States
  • Alabama
    • Homewood, Alabama, United States, 35209
    • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
    • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
    • Montgomery, Alabama, United States, 36117
  • Alaska
    • Anchorage, Alaska, United States, 99508
  • Arizona
    • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85051
    • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
    • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85741
  • California
    • Atherton, California, United States, 94027
    • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
    • Buena Park, California, United States, 90620
    • Burbank, California, United States, 91506
    • Carmichael, California, United States, 95608
    • Fresno, California, United States, 93720
    • La Mesa, California, United States, 91942
    • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90017
    • Mission Hills, California, United States, 91345
    • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
    • Orange, California, United States, 92869
    • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
    • San Bernardino, California, United States, 92404
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92108
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92120
    • San Francisco, California, United States, 94102
    • Tarzana, California, United States, 91356
    • Torrance, California, United States, 90505
  • Colorado
    • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80012
    • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
    • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80211
    • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80112
  • Connecticut
    • New Britain, Connecticut, United States, 06052
    • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
  • Florida
    • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
    • Celebration, Florida, United States, 34747
    • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
    • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33761
    • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33916
    • Ocala, Florida, United States, 34471
    • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
    • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33027
    • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33024
    • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34237
    • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
    • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
    • Wellington, Florida, United States, 33414
    • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
  • Georgia
    • Alpharetta, Georgia, United States, 30005
    • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
    • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30328
    • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30034
    • Roswell, Georgia, United States, 30076
  • Idaho
    • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States, 83814
    • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404
  • Illinois
    • Melrose Park, Illinois, United States, 60160
  • Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46825
    • Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States, 47130
    • Newburgh, Indiana, United States, 47630
  • Iowa
    • Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50309
  • Kansas
    • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 57207
  • Louisiana
    • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71106
  • Maryland
    • Greenbelt, Maryland, United States, 20770
  • Massachusetts
    • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01103
    • Watertown, Massachusetts, United States, 02472
  • Missouri
    • North Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64116
  • Montana
    • Billings, Montana, United States, 59102
  • Nebraska
    • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68516
    • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
  • Nevada
    • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89148
  • New Jersey
    • West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
  • New Mexico
    • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87109
  • New York
    • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
    • Endwell, New York, United States, 13760
    • Garden City, New York, United States, 11530
    • Kingston, New York, United States, 12401
    • Poughkeepsie, New York, United States, 12601
  • North Carolina
    • Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27518
    • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28209
    • Concord, North Carolina, United States, 28025
    • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401
    • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
  • North Dakota
    • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58104
  • Ohio
    • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45212
    • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44122
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
    • Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States, 44124
    • Wadsworth, Ohio, United States, 44281
  • Oklahoma
    • Bethany, Oklahoma, United States, 73008
    • Edmond, Oklahoma, United States, 73034
  • Pennsylvania
    • Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States, 19004
    • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17604
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19114
    • Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19611
  • Rhode Island
    • Warwick, Rhode Island, United States, 02886
  • South Carolina
    • Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29650
    • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
    • Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States, 29681
  • Tennessee
    • Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620
  • Texas
    • Arlington, Texas, United States, 76017
    • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
    • Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78414
    • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77024
    • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
  • Utah
    • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107
  • Virginia
    • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23502
  • Washington
    • Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States, 98043
    • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98166
    • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
    • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98405

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
• Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥ 3 months
• Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
• Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
• Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
• Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
• Patient has diabetic neuropathy
• Patient has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
• Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
• Patient has severe hypertension
• Patient has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or any of the other inactive ingredients
• Patient has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days
• Patient had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
• Patient has serum creatinine of >150 μmol/L, or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or Gamma glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) > 3x ULN
• Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo; Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks	Drug: Placebo; Oral
Experimental: Mirabegron 50 mg; Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks	Drug: Mirabegron; Oral; Other Names: YM178; Myrebtriq
Experimental: Mirabegron 100 mg; Participants received mirabegron 100 m tablets, orally once a day for 12 weeks	Drug: Mirabegron; Oral; Other Names: YM178; Myrebtriq

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours	The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Week 12 (Final Visit)
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours	The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition	The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours	The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours	The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours	The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours	The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition	The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours	The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours	The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency	Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours	Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours	The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit	The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.	Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit	The percentage of participants with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score	Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score	Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed	The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline and Week12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working	The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment	The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment	The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)	The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)	The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)	The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician	The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.	Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit	The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a 1 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a 2 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score	The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score	The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score	The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score	The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.	Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score	The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.	Baseline and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Astellas Pharma Inc
• Investigators: Study Director: Use Central Contact, Astellas Pharma Global Development

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Nitti VW, Auerbach S, Martin N, Calhoun A, Lee M, Herschorn S. Results of a randomized phase III trial of mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder. J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
• Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.

Helpful Links

• Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 28, 2008
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 22, 2009
• Study Completion (Actual): April 22, 2009

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 17, 2008
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 17, 2008
• First Posted (Estimated): April 21, 2008

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 20, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 29, 2024
• Last Verified: October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Urinary incontinence; YM178; Urgency; Frequency; Overactive bladder (OAB); Micturition; Urinary urge incontinence
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Urogenital Diseases; Male Urogenital Diseases; Urologic Diseases; Female Urogenital Diseases; Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Urological Manifestations; Urinary Bladder Diseases; Urinary Bladder, Overactive; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Neurotransmitter Agents; Adrenergic Agonists; Adrenergic Agents; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists; Urological Agents; Mirabegron
• Other Study ID Numbers: 178-CL-047

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL; SAP; CSR