- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00665626
Efficacy and Safety Study of R935788 Tablets to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis (Taski-3) (Taski-3)
March 29, 2017 updated by: Rigel Pharmaceuticals
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Dose Study of R935788 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Failed at Least One Biologic
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Spleen Tyrosine Kinase (Syk) Inhibitor, R935788 (R788) at a dose of 100 mg, tablet, orally, twice-a-day is effective in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in patients who have 'failed' a biologic therapy.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
219
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antwepen, Belgium, 2020
- ZNA Middelheim
-
Gent, Belgium, 9000
- UZ Gent
-
Liege, Belgium, 4000
- CHU Liège
-
-
-
-
Antioquia
-
Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia
- Reumalab S.A.
-
-
Atlantico
-
Barranquilla, Atlantico, Colombia
- Reumatologos del Caribe
-
-
Cundinamarca
-
Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia
- CIREEM
-
Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia
- Dr. Renato Guzman
-
Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia
- Riesgo de Fractura S.A.
-
-
-
-
-
Bordeaux Cedex, France, 33076
- Hôpital Pellegrin
-
-
-
-
-
Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
- Klinikum der J.W. Goethe Universitaet
-
Hamburg, Germany, 22081
- Klinikum Eilbek
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04103
- ClinPharm International GmbH Leipzig
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04103
- Rheumazentrum am Universitatsklinikum Leipzig
-
Wurzburg, Germany, 97070
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
-
-
-
-
-
Siena, Italy, 53100
- Reumatologia Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria
-
Udine, Italy, 33100
- Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria della Miseri
-
-
-
-
-
Lima, Peru, 33
- Instituto de Ginecología y Reproducción
-
-
-
-
California
-
Aventura, California, United States, 33180
- Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties
-
Palm Desert, California, United States, 92260
- Desert Medical Advances
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92108
- San Diego Arthritis & Medical Clinic
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
- Department of Rheumatology
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
- RASF-Clinical Research Center
-
Gainsville, Florida, United States, 32607
- Florida Medical Research Institute
-
Ocala, Florida, United States, 34474
- Paddock Park Clinical Research
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34233
- Lovelace Scientific Resources
-
-
Idaho
-
Boise, Idaho, United States, 83702
- Intermountain Orthopedics
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- Rheumatology Associates, SC
-
-
Indiana
-
South Bend, Indiana, United States, 46601
- Memorial Medical Group Clinical Research Inst
-
-
Kentucky
-
Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States, 42701
- Center for Arthritis & Osteoperosis
-
-
Maryland
-
Cumberland, Maryland, United States, 21502
- The Osteoporosis & Clinical Trials Center
-
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States, 21740
- The Osteoporosis & Clinical Trials Center
-
-
Michigan
-
Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48910
- Fiechtner Research, Inc.
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
- Westroads Medical Group
-
-
New York
-
Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
- North Shore Long Island Jewich Health System
-
Roslyn, New York, United States, 11576
- Andrew Porges, MD PC
-
Smithtown, New York, United States, 11787
- Rheumatology Associates of Long Island
-
-
Ohio
-
Mayfield Village, Ohio, United States, 44143
- Clinical Research Division
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
- Health Research of Oklahoma
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16508
- Rheumatology Associates
-
West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 34474
- Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP
-
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States, 19090
- Rheumatic Disease Associates
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
- Austin Rheumatology & Research
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77074
- Houston Institute for Clinical Research
-
-
Washington
-
Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
- Arthritis Northwest, PLLC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients must give written informed consent by signing an IRB/EC-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to admission to this study.
- Males and females, 18 years of age or older, with active RA for at least 12 months prior to Day 1 dosing
- Are currently receiving or previously had received a biologic therapy with an inhibitor of TNF, rituximab, abatacept, or anakinra at an approved labeled dose for ≥3 months prior to Day 1 dosing and are designated as biologic therapy failures for lack of efficacy, safety, or tolerability.
- Patients may receive stable doses of methotrexate (MTX), azathioprine (not in combination with MTX), leflunomide (not in combination with MTX), sulfasalazine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, gold, NSAIDs (including COX2 inhibitors), minocycline, or doxycycline. The dose must have been stable for at least 30 days prior to Day 1 dosing and must not be changed during the washout, screening and treatment periods, unless dictated by tolerability requirements. Patients who are taking MTX must have been receiving weekly MTX doses (7.5-25 mg/week) for a minimum of 3 months prior to Day 1 dosing and must be receiving a stable MTX dose, with no change in route, for the previous 6 weeks prior to Day 1 dosing. Patients who are receiving MTX must also be receiving folic or folinic acid supplementation at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to Day 1 dosing.
- Females of childbearing potential must be fully informed of the potential for R788 to adversely affect the fetus and, if sexually active, must agree to use a well established method of birth control during the study (oral contraceptive, mechanical barrier, long acting hormonal agent). These patients must not be lactating and must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the time of randomization and at each laboratory determination.
- The patient must otherwise be in good health as determined by the Investigator on the basis of medical history, physical examination, and laboratory screening tests during the screening period. See exclusion criteria for specific exclusions.
- In the Investigator's opinion, the patient has the ability to understand the nature of the study and any hazards of participation, and to communicate satisfactorily with the Investigator and to participate in, and to comply with, the requirements of the entire protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
The patient has a history of, or a concurrent, clinically significant illness, medical condition (other than arthritis) or laboratory abnormality that, in the Investigator's opinion, could affect the conduct of the study. Specifically, excluded are patients with the following:
- uncontrolled or poorly controlled hypertension;
- other autoimmune disease (psoriatic arthritis, lupus, mixed connective disorder) or arthritis syndromes (gout, Lyme disease, Reiter's syndrome);
- recent serious surgery or infectious disease;
- recent history ( of, or treatment for, a malignancy other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer, or any history of lymphoma;
- Hepatitis B;
- Hepatitis C;
- interstitial pneumonitis or active pulmonary infection on chest x-ray
- Tuberculosis (TB)
- known laboratory abnormalities
- The patient has a history of substance abuse, drug addiction or alcoholism. Patients may consume up to 4 units of alcohol per week; however, alcohol should be avoided in the 72 hours prior to lab assessments. Patients who cannot reliably comply with this should be excluded. A unit of alcohol is defined as the following: Beer=12 oz or 355 mL; wine = 5 oz or 148 mL; sweet dessert wine=3 oz or 89 mL; 80 proof distilled spirits= 1.5 oz or 44 mL.
- The patient has been treated previously treated with R788 under a different protocol.
- The patient has a pacemaker, aneurysm clip or other contraindication to MRI.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1
Fostamatinib disodium (R935788) 100 mg tablet, orally, twice-a-day
|
R935788 100 mg tablet, orally, twice-a-day
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Arm 2
Placebo, orally, twice-a-day
|
Placebo, orally, twice-a-day
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The number of participants with greater than or equal to 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts, AND in any 3 of the following: physician's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and CRP or ESR, after 3 months
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The number of participants with greater than or equal to 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts, AND in any 3 of the following: physician's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI; and CRP or ESR, whichever was elevated at baseline, after 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The number of participants with greater than or equal to 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts, AND in any 3 of the following: physician's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI; and CRP or ESR, whichever was elevated at baseline, after 3 months
|
3 months
|
|
American College of Rheumatology Index of Improvement (ACRn) at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The index of improvement in RA, where 0 indicates no improvement and 100 indicates a 100% improvement across all signs and symptoms of RA after 3 months of treatment
|
3 months
|
|
Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <2.6 at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Number of participants with DAS28-CRP (measuring RA symptoms including: tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient's assessment of disease activity, and CRP in patients with high CRP at baseline), of less than 2.6.
The DAS runs from 0 to 10 - higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
A score of less than 2.6 indicates remission of RA symptoms
|
3 months
|
|
Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <3.2 at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Number of participants with DAS28-CRP (measuring RA symptoms including: tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient's assessment of disease activity, and CRP in patients with high CRP at baseline), of less than 3.2.
The DAS runs from 0 to 10 - higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
A score of less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
|
3 months
|
|
Disease Activity Score-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) <2.6 at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Number of participants with DAS28-ESR (measuring RA symptoms including: tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient's assessment of disease activity, and ESR in patients with high ESR at baseline), of less than 2.6.
The DAS runs from 0 to 10 - higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
A score of less than 2.6 indicates remission of RA symptoms
|
3 months
|
|
Disease Activity Score-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) <3.2 at 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Number of participants with DAS28-ESR (measuring RA symptoms including: tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient's assessment of disease activity, and ESR in patients with high ESR at baseline), of less than 3.2.
The DAS runs from 0 to 10 - higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
A score of less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
|
3 months
|
|
American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 1
Time Frame: 1 week
|
The number of participants with greater than or equal to 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts, AND in any 3 of the following: physician's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI; and CRP or ESR, whichever was elevated at baseline, after 1 week.
|
1 week
|
|
American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 2
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The number of participants with greater than or equal to 20% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts, AND in any 3 of the following: physician's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI; and CRP or ESR, whichever was elevated at baseline, after 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring (RAMRIS) Erosion Score at 3 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
|
Change from baseline in RAMRIS erosion score (a measure of bone erosion in the hands and wrists), calculated as the score at 3 months minus the score at baseline.
The erosion score runs from 0 to 250 with lower values indicating a better clinical condition.
A negative change indicates an improvement in symptoms.
|
Baseline to 3 months
|
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring (RAMRIS) Osteitis Score at 3 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
|
Change from baseline in RAMRIS osteitis score (a measure of bone inflammation in the hands and wrists), calculated as the score at 3 months minus the score at baseline.
The osteitis score runs from 0 to 75 with lower values indicating a better clinical condition.
A negative change indicates an improvement in symptoms.
|
Baseline to 3 months
|
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring (RAMRIS) Synovitis Score at 3 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
|
Change from baseline in RAMRIS synovitis score (a measure of inflammation in the joints of the hands and wrists), calculated as the score at 3 months minus the score at baseline.
The synovitis score runs from 0 to 24 with lower values indicating a better clinical condition.
A negative change indicates an improvement in symptoms.
|
Baseline to 3 months
|
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ALT (a test of liver function) values greater than 1.5 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5-2x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ALT (a test of liver function) values greater than 1.5 to 2 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >2-3x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ALT (a test of liver function) values greater than 2 to 3 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >3x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ALT (a test of liver function) values greater than 3 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >3-5x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ALT (a test of liver function) values greater than 3 to 5 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >5-10x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ALT (a test of liver function) values greater than 5 to 10 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) >10x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ALT (a test of liver function) values greater than 10 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >1.5x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with AST (a test of liver function) values greater than 1.5 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >1.5-2x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with AST (a test of liver function) values greater than 1.5 to 2 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >2-3x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with AST (a test of liver function) values greater than 2 to 3 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with AST (a test of liver function) values greater than 3 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >3-5x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with AST (a test of liver function) values greater than 3 to 5 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >5-10x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with AST (a test of liver function) values greater than 5 to 10 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >10x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with AST (a test of liver function) values greater than 10 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Alkaline Phosphatase >1.5x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) and >1.5x Baseline
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with alkaline phosphatase (a test of liver function) values greater than 1.5 times the ULN and greater than 1.5 times baseline
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Bilirubin >1.5x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with bilirubin (a test of liver function) values greater than 1.5 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Bilirubin >2x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with bilirubin (a test of liver function) values greater than 2 times the ULN
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) <1500/mm3
Time Frame: Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
The number of participants with ANC values less than 1500/mm3
|
Any time between baseline and 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Daniel B Magilavy, MD, Rigel Pharmaceuticals
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 23, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
April 24, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 1, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 29, 2017
Last Verified
March 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- C-935788-011
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.