Retapamulin Versus Placebo in Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions (SITL)

October 11, 2016 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Superiority Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Placebo Ointment Applied Twice Daily for 5 Days in the Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Subjects With SITL

The purpose of Study TOC110977 is to demonstrate clinical superiority of Retapamulin ointment, 1%, over placebo in patients with secondarily-infected traumatic lesions, which includes secondarily-infected lacerations, abrasions and sutured wounds. Subjects 2 months of age and older will be treated with topical retapamulin or placebo ointment twice daily for 5 days. The primary endpoint of this study is the clinical response at follow-up (Day 12-14; 7-9 days after the end of therapy) in the intent-to-treat clinical population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study in subjects aged 2 months and older with SITL, including secondarily-infected lacerations, sutured wounds or abrasions. A laceration or sutured wound cannot exceed 10 cm in length with surrounding erythema not extending more than 2 cm from the edge of the lesion. Abrasions cannot exceed 100 cm2 in total area, or up to a maximum of 2% total body surface area for subjects <18 years of age, with surrounding erythema not extending more than 2 cm from the edge of the abrasion.

There are four study visits occurring over a 12-14 day period. At the Baseline visit (Visit 1, Day 1), subjects will be randomized to receive retapamulin or placebo ointment in a 2:1 (retapamulin:placebo) ratio. The 2:1 randomization is included to minimize the number of subjects exposed to treatment with placebo. Both active treatment and placebo will be dosed topically twice daily (BID) for 5 days. All subjects will receive a telephone call from the investigator or appropriate designee appointed by the investigator on Day 2. The subject will be interviewed to determine if there is any evidence of worsening infection. Subjects who are thought to be worsening will be instructed to come in to the clinic for an assessment. Subjects will be monitored and clinically evaluated at the On-therapy (Days 3-4), End of Therapy (Days 7-9), and Follow-up (Days 12-14) visits.

Randomization will be center-based and performed using an appropriate Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS), an automated telephone system. The block size will remain confidential.

Subjects are considered to have completed the study if they meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria, are considered compliant with study medication, and attend all study visits as defined by the protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

508

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, CP1431FWO
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1180AAX
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Buenos Aires
      • Chivilocoy, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 6620
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Loma Hermosa, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1657
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Paraná
      • Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, 80240-280
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Curitiba/Paraná, Paraná, Brazil, 80810-050
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Passo Fundo, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 99010-080
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Bangalore, India, 560002
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lucknow, India, 226003
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Pune, India
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Vadodara, India, 390001
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Wardha, India, 442102
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Belville, South Africa, 7530
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Benoni, South Africa, 1501
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cape Town, South Africa, 7572
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cape Town, South Africa
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hatfield, South Africa, 83
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lynnwood, South Africa, 81
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Midrand, South Africa, 1
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Newton, South Africa, 6045
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Welkom, South Africa, 9460
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Worcester, South Africa, 6850
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85705
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • California
      • Anaheim, California, United States, 92804
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93710
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Irvine, California, United States, 90620
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95825
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80904
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States, 33441
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hollywood, Florida, United States, 33023
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33144
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33155
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32712
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Panama City, Florida, United States, 32401
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Vero Beach, Florida, United States, 32960
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States, 60005
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Montana
      • Butte, Montana, United States, 59701
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • New Jersey
      • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11229
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11218
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • East Syracuse, New York, United States, 13057
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Johnson City, New York, United States, 13790
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45246
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States, 19401
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States, 15401
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77036
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Utah
      • Bountiful, Utah, United States, 84010
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Virginia
      • Vienna, Virginia, United States, 22180
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 months and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • subject is aged 2 months or older
  • subject has secondarily-infected traumatic lesion (laceration, sutured wound or abrasion)
  • negative urine pregnancy test
  • subject has total skin infection rating scale score of at least 8, including pus/exudate score of at least 3
  • subject and/or parent/legal guardian is willing and able to comply with protocol
  • subject or parent/legal guardian has given written informed consent or assent as applicable

Exclusion criteria:

  • previous hypersensitivity to pleuromutilin
  • secondarily-infected animal/human bite or puncture wound
  • subject has an abscess
  • chronic ulcerative lesion
  • underlying skin disease
  • systemic signs and symptoms of infection
  • infection not appropriately treated with topical antibiotic
  • infection requires surgical intervention prior to or during study
  • subject received systemic antibacterial or steroid, or topical therapeutic agent within 24 hours of entry into study
  • serious underlying disease
  • subject pregnant, breast feeding or planning a pregnancy, or unacceptable method of contraception
  • other investigational drug within 30 days of study entry
  • subject previously enrolled in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Retapamulin Ointment, 1%
Provided as approximately 10 grams of an off-white smooth ointment in collapsible aluminum tubes with reverse taper puncture tip caps.
Other Names:
  • 1%
  • Retapamulin Ointment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo Ointment
Provided as approximately 10 grams of an off-white smooth ointment in collapsible aluminum tubes with reverse taper puncture tip caps.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Primary Efficacy Population
Time Frame: Days 12-14
"Clinical Success" at follow-up was defined as "Resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline including a pus/exudate Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score of "0". Clinical response at follow-up was classified as "Clinical Failure" for all other cases. The SIRS consists of seven items (pus/exudates, crusting, erythema/inflammation, tissue warmth, tissue edema, itching and pain). Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 6 (0=absent, 6=severe). The SIRS total score was calculated as the sum of the scores of all 7 SIRS items.
Days 12-14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Intent-to-Treat Bacteriology (ITTB) Subset of the Primary Efficacy Population
Time Frame: Days 12-14
"Clinical Success" at follow-up was defined as "Resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline including a pus/exudate Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score of "0". Clinical response at follow-up was classified as "Clinical Failure" for all other cases. The SIRS consists of seven items (pus/exudates, crusting, erythema/inflammation, tissue warmth, tissue edema, itching and pain). Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 6 (0=absent, 6=severe). The SIRS total score was calculated as the sum of the scores of all 7 SIRS items.
Days 12-14
Number of Participants With Microbiological Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)
Time Frame: Days 12-14
The "by pathogen" microbiological outcome was determined by comparing the baseline culture results to those at follow-up. The "by subject" microbiological response was "Microbiological Success" if the microbiological outcomes for all baseline pathogens (bps) belong to "Eradication" (elimination of bps), "Presumed Eradication" (clinical outcome was success; no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material), or "Colonization" (previously unidentified pathogen is identified at end of therapy in participant who is resolved/improved); otherwise, response was "Microbiological Failure".
Days 12-14
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)
Time Frame: Days 7-9
Clinical outcome is determined by the investigator based on signs and symptoms (S/S) at the end of therapy evaluation. The 4 clincal outcome categories are: clinical success, resolution of clinically meaningful S/S of infection recorded at baseline (BL), including a pus/exudates score of 0; clinical improvement, improvement of S/S of infection recorded at BL to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy is necessary; clinical failure, insufficient improvement of deterioration of S/S of infection recorded at BL such that additional antibiotic therapy is required; unable to determine.
Days 7-9
Number of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)
Time Frame: Days 7-9
The "by pathogen" microbiological outcome was determined by comparing the baseline culture results to those at follow-up. The results presented below pooled all baseline pathogens (bps). Eradication: elimination of bps. Presumed Eradication: clinical outcome was success; no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material. Presumed Improvement: clinical outcome was improvement such that no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material. Persistence: bps still present. Presumed persistence: clinical failure and no culture was obtained.
Days 7-9
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)
Time Frame: Follow-up (Days 12-14)
"Therapeutic Success (Succ)" was referred to as both "Clinical Succ" and "Microbiological (Micro) Succ" at Follow-up. "Clinical Succ" was the "Resolution of baseline signs/symptoms of infection with a pus score of "0." A participant was "Micro Succ" if the micro outcome for all baseline pathogens (bps) belonged to "Eradication" (elimination of bps), "Presumed Eradication" (clinical outcome is success; no culturable material), or "Colonization" (new pathogen is identified at end of therapy in participants who are resolved/improved). All other combinations were deemed "Therapeutic Failures."
Follow-up (Days 12-14)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 26, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Study Data/Documents

  1. Annotated Case Report Form
    Information identifier: TOC110977
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  2. Statistical Analysis Plan
    Information identifier: TOC110977
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  3. Individual Participant Data Set
    Information identifier: TOC110977
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  4. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: TOC110977
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  5. Clinical Study Report
    Information identifier: TOC110977
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  6. Informed Consent Form
    Information identifier: TOC110977
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
  7. Dataset Specification
    Information identifier: TOC110977
    Information comments: For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Infections, Bacterial

Clinical Trials on Retapamulin Ointment, 1%

3
Subscribe