- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00685217
Transvaginal Tape (TVT) Secur Versus TVT Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)
August 29, 2016 updated by: Dr. Sue Ross, University of Calgary
Tension-free Vaginal Tape Management of Stress Incontinence in Women: Randomized Trial of TVT Secur Versus TVT
This randomized multi-centre trial will recruit women with stress urinary incontinence who need surgical treatment for their condition.
300 women will be allocated either to receive a TVT Secur or a standard TVT surgical procedure.
The main outcome is effectiveness of the procedure, determined using a 1-hour pad test (which tests for urine leakage) 12 months after surgery.
The study will be carried out in 4 to 6 centers and will involve urogynaecologists, urologists and general obstetrician-gynaecologists: all clinicians will have received adequate training.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
74
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1C5
- Foothills Medical Centre
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5H 3V9
- Royal Alexandra Hospital
-
-
British Columbia
-
Penticton, British Columbia, Canada, V2A 3G6
- Penticton Regional Hospital
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7L 2L7
- Lions Gate Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women with stress incontinence, defined as leaking with increased abdominal pressure
- Eligible for both types of surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
Women who:
- Have vaginal prolapse requiring surgical repair
- Have had previous incontinence surgery
- Have overactive bladder or incontinence is caused only by bladder overflow
- Intend to have further children
- Have Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease, progressive neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis, or are immunocompromised
- Are unable to understand English
- Will be unavailable for follow-up
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: TVT Secur surgical device
Single incision tape device
|
Sling device for stress urinary incontinence
|
|
Active Comparator: TVT surgical device
Usual care retropubic tape device
|
Sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Standardised pad test: "cure" is defined as less than 1g gain in pad weight over the duration of the test
Time Frame: 12 months following surgery
|
12 months following surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective evidence of cure
Time Frame: 12 months following surgery
|
12 months following surgery
|
|
|
Incontinence-related quality of life (UDI-6, IIQ-7)
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 12 months following surgery
|
6 weeks and 12 months following surgery
|
|
|
Sexual function (PISQ-12)
Time Frame: 12 months following surgery
|
12 months following surgery
|
|
|
Satisfaction with surgical outcome
Time Frame: 12 months following surgery
|
Patients will be asked about the expectations they had before surgery, and asked if the outcome had met expectations.
Women will be asked about satisfaction with the surgical outcome, if they would have the same operation again under the same circumstances, and if they would recommend the same operation to someone else with the same problem.
|
12 months following surgery
|
|
Return to usual activities
Time Frame: up to 12 months following surgery
|
up to 12 months following surgery
|
|
|
Voiding dysfunction
Time Frame: 12 months following surgery
|
12 months following surgery
|
|
|
Surgical complications
Time Frame: up to 12 months following surgery
|
up to 12 months following surgery
|
|
|
Cost
Time Frame: up to 12 momths following surgery
|
up to 12 momths following surgery
|
|
|
Utility (15-D)
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 12 months following surgery
|
6 weeks and 12 months following surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Sue Ross, PhD, University Of Calgary
- Principal Investigator: Jane Schulz, MD, University of Alberta
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 27, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
May 28, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
August 31, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 29, 2016
Last Verified
August 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21528
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
IPD Plan Description
The decision to share would depend on the protocol of an IPD analysis protocol
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.