A Trial Comparing Circumferential Casting Versus Splinting in Displaced Colles' Fractures

June 24, 2008 updated by: University of British Columbia

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Circumferential Casting Versus Splinting in Displaced Colles' Fractures

Displaced fractures of the distal radius requiring closed reduction (otherwise known as Colles fractures) are common in the emergency department. The purpose of the study is to determine if there is any difference between 3 methods of immobilization for these fractures: circumferential cast, volar-dorsal splint, and modified sugar tong splint. Maintenance of position was assessed at 4 weeks after the injury and wrist strength and function were assessed at 2 months and 6 months. We hypothesize that there will not be a clinically important difference between these methods of immobilizing for displaced fractures of the distal radius requiring closed reduction.

Extended description of the protocol, including information not already contained in other fields.

Objectives:

Primary: To determine the effectiveness of three immobilization methods (circumferential cast [CC], volar dorsal splint [VDS], modified sugar-tong [MST] splint) in maintaining the position of displaced distal radius fractures after successful closed reduction.

Secondary to assess long term functional outcomes associated with fiberglass splint immobilization versus standard cylindrical casting in patients maintaining initial non-operative reductions.

Design: Randomized prospective single blind controlled trial Patients/Participants: Patients over 18 years of age who presented to the emergency department with a displaced fracture of the distal radius, requiring closed reduction.

Outcome Measurements: Loss of reduction (radiological slippage or the need for surgical fixation during the 3-4 week primary immobilization period after initial successful reduction). Secondary outcomes were DASH score, return to work, activities of daily living (ADL), wrist pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength.

Study Phase Phase 3 Study Type Interventional - Assigned to treatment Recruitment status Completed 2003 Record Verification Date March 2003 Anticipated trial start date November 1998 Last Follow-Up Date December 2002 Data Entry Closure Date January 2004 Study Completion Date July 2004 Purpose Treatment Allocation Randomized

Masking Single Blind Control Active Assignment Parallel Endpoints Efficacy Primary outcome Radiologic slippage of fracture at 4 weeks post reduction

Key secondary outcomes Functional outcomes: DASH score, return to work, activities of daily living (ADL), wrist pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary: To determine the effectiveness of three immobilization methods (circumferential cast [CC], volar dorsal splint [VDS], modified sugar-tong [MST] splint) in maintaining the position of displaced distal radius fractures after successful closed reduction.

Secondary to assess long term functional outcomes associated with fiberglass splint immobilization versus standard cylindrical casting in patients maintaining initial non-operative reductions.

Design: Randomized prospective single blind controlled trial Patients/Participants: Patients over 18 years of age who presented to the emergency department with a displaced fracture of the distal radius, requiring closed reduction.

Outcome Measurements: Loss of reduction (radiological slippage or the need for surgical fixation during the 3-4 week primary immobilization period after initial successful reduction). Secondary outcomes were DASH score, return to work, activities of daily living (ADL), wrist pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V1Y 1Z1
        • Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Displaced fracture of distal radius requiring closed reduction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fracture
  • Previous displaced fracture involving the same or contralateral distal radius
  • neuromuscular deficits or CVA of either upper extremity that impaired functional outcome assessment
  • concurrent carpal bone fractures or dislocations - - unstable fractures requiring primary open reduction and internal fixation
  • skin allergy or sensitivity to either of the immobilization materials
  • Smith's, Barton's or Chauffeur fractures
  • Neurovascular compromise of the affected limb - - Bilateral distal radius fractures that prevented follow-up comparison with a normal contralateral limb
  • Other significant and concurrent injuries in the ipsilateral extremity.
  • Undisplaced distal radius fracture
  • Reduction performed in the ED did not meet criteria for successful fracture reduction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Cylindrical cast
Arm cast/immobilization technique for wrist fracture
Active Comparator: 2
Modified sugar tong cast
Arm cast/immobilization technique for wrist fracture
Active Comparator: 3
Volar dorsal splint
Arm cast/immobilization technique for wrist fracture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Radiologic slippage of fracture at 4 weeks post reduction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Functional outcomes: DASH score, return to work, activities of daily living (ADL), wrist pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Stenstrom, MD, Ph.D, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Eric Grafstein, MD, University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 1998

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2008

Last Verified

June 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe