Effect on Bleeding When Using FloSeal Matrix™ in Subjects Undergoing Endoscopic Vein Harvest (EVH)

February 17, 2014 updated by: Duke University
This is a prospective, randomized trial to see in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and endoscopically-harvested greater saphenous vein, if using FloSeal Matrix in the endoscopically-harvested saphenous vein wound bed decreases bleeding and complications.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Purpose of Study: The primary objective of this study is to determine if using a hemostatic agent (FloSeal Matrix™) in the tunnel of the endoscopically harvested Greater Saphenous vein will decrease bleeding from that site. Secondary objectives are to determine if there is a decrease in the infection-rate at the site of the vein-harvested leg where the FloSeal Matrix™ was used compared to the ones where FloSeal Matrix™ was not used.

Background and Significance: FloSeal Matrix™ is indicated in surgical procedures (other than ophthalmic) as an adjunct to hemostasis when control of bleeding by ligature or conventional procedures is ineffective or impractical. It works on wet, actively bleeding tissue and conforms to irregular wound surfaces. It is proven to control bleeding from oozing to pulsatile flow. The EVH wound bed is irregular and hemostasis is, at times, difficult to obtain using conventional procedures such as ligature or cautery.

Design and Procedures: This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial that compares the effects of applying FloSeal Matrix™ to the EVH wound bed to not applying FloSeal Matrix™ to the EVH wound bed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Sign a consent form that has been approved by the Institutional Review Board.
  2. Be at least 18 years of age.
  3. Scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting with EVH.
  4. Be able to return to Duke University Medical Center for post-operative visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Be participating concurrently in another clinical trial that involves an investigational drug or device that would interfere with this study.
  2. Reported allergy to FloSeal Matrix™

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm A
Arm A has FloSeal Matrix applied to EVH wound bed.
10 ml of FloSeal Matrix will be applied to the endoscopic wound bed.
Other Names:
  • FloSeal Hemostatic Matrix
NO_INTERVENTION: Arm B
Arm B does not have FloSeal Matrix applied to EVH wound bed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Decreased Bleeding
Time Frame: 14 days
The number of participants with less than expected bleeding (bleeding typically expected for the vein grafting procedure) at the surgical site. Blood was collected in the Blake drain of the EVH wound bed treated with FloSeal MatrixFloSeal Matrix™in the tunnel of the endoscopically harvested Greater Saphenous vein.
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James E Lowe, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 27, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00009897

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe