A Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Study of ACE-011 in Patients With Osteolytic Lesions of Multiple Myeloma

June 17, 2024 updated by: Celgene

A Phase 2a, Multi-Center, Randomized, Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of ACE-011 (hActRIIA-IgG1) in Patients With Osteolytic Lesions of Multiple Myeloma

Multi-center, randomized, multiple-dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ACE-011 in patients with osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Investigative Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient at least 18 years of age with stage II or III multiple myeloma
  • One or more lytic bone lesions
  • If currently receiving bisphosphonate therapy, have been on a stable dose for ≥ 2 months before dosing day 1 or must not have received bisphosphonates within 2 months of dosing day 1
  • If patient has undergone previous autologous or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), they must be stable (in the opinion of the investigator) and be a minimum of 6 months since HSCT
  • Has planned HSCT for the duration of the study
  • Has moles or lesions that are currently undiagnosed, but are suspect for malignancy
  • Has an underlying condition that may result in abnormal bone metabolism other than cancer related bone lesions, such as a history of hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, hypocalcemia, rheumatoid arthritis, myeloproliferative disorder, gout, Paget's disease of the bone, or osteomalacia; patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to multiple myeloma diagnosis are eligible to participate.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known underlying condition that may result in abnormal bone metabolism other than cancer related bone lesions
  • History of polyneuropathy ≥ grade 3
  • Patients with plasma cell leukemia
  • Planned stem cell transplant (HSCT) or radiation for the duration of the study
  • Skeletal related event within 2 weeks of study enrollment
  • Has received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) within the last 21 days or is planned to receive ESAs during the course of the study
  • Has received anti-myeloma therapy within the last 21 days
  • Is scheduled to receive local radiation to bone during the course of the study
  • Has taken estrogen, androgen, anabolic steroids, calcitonin or other bone-active drugs within 4 months of study enrollment
  • Woman of childbearing potential (not undergone a hysterectomy or who have not been postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subcutaneous injection on days 1, 29, 57 and 85.
Placebo given by the subcutaneous route of administration monthly for 4 doses.
Experimental: ACE-011 0.1 mg/kg
Subcutaneous injection of ACE-011 0.1 mg/kg every 28 days totaling four doses (days 1, 29, 57 and 85).
ACE-011 given by the subcutaneous route of administration monthly for 4 doses.
Other Names:
  • hActRIIA-IgG1
Experimental: ACE-011 0.3 mg/kg
Subcutaneous injection of ACE-011 0.3 mg/kg every 28 days totaling four doses (days 1, 29, 57 and 85).
ACE-011 given by the subcutaneous route of administration monthly for 4 doses.
Other Names:
  • hActRIIA-IgG1
Experimental: ACE-011 0.5 mg/kg
Subcutaneous injection of ACE-011 0.5 mg/kg every 28 days totaling four doses (days 1, 29, 57 and 85).
ACE-011 given by the subcutaneous route of administration monthly for 4 doses.
Other Names:
  • hActRIIA-IgG1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose to termination visit on Day 169
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causality assessment. A TEAE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinical significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition, which was temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's medicinal (investigational) product, was also a TEAE. The number of participants with at least one TEAE are reported.
From first dose to termination visit on Day 169
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to Study Drug
Time Frame: From first dose to termination visit on Day 169
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) related to study drug was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, that was determined to be related to the study drug. A TEAE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinical significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition, which was temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's medicinal (investigational) product, was also a TEAE. The number of participants with at least one TEAE are reported. Treatment emergent adverse events were assessed by the investigator as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug.
From first dose to termination visit on Day 169
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose up to termination visit on Day 169
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose (including overdose) that was fatal, was life threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in permanent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. The number of participants with at least one serious adverse event are reported.
From first dose up to termination visit on Day 169
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Day 8, Day 29, Day 36, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 169
Summary of the change from baseline in hemoglobin (g/dL) by the pre-specified timepoints. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to dosing. Data were summarized for all treated participants who had at least 1 postdosing measurement.
Day 1 (baseline), Day 8, Day 29, Day 36, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 169
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities
Time Frame: Pre-dose, Day 1, Day 92, and Day 169
The number of participants with at least one clinically significant postbaseline electrocardiogram abnormality. The abnormalities included left ventricular hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia, sinus tachycardia, and myocardial ischemia. Data is reported as the cumulative number of participants with abnormalities over the scheduled collection timepoints.
Pre-dose, Day 1, Day 92, and Day 169
Number of Participants With Hypertension or Increased Blood Pressure
Time Frame: From baseline up to Day 92

The number of participants who experienced hypertension or an increase in blood pressure from baseline up to Day 92. Abnormal blood pressure was defined as:

  • Systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 or ≥ 180 mmHg
  • Systolic blood pressure change (increase or decrease) ≥ 20 mmHg
  • Diastolic blood pressure ≤ 60 or ≥ 100 mmHg
  • Diastolic blood pressure change (increase or decrease) ≥ 15 mmHg
From baseline up to Day 92

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Skeletal-related Events (SRE)
Time Frame: From first dose up to 2 weeks post first dose
Skeletal-related events are defined as pathologic fracture, radiation therapy to bone, surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression, within 2 weeks of study enrollment. They are determined by skeletal surveys, including x-rays of the skull, entire spine, pelvis, ribs, humeri, and femora.
From first dose up to 2 weeks post first dose
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 1) to Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale. Scores are based on the percent change from baseline (Day 1) in self-reported measures of symptoms that are recorded with a single handwritten mark placed at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale-"no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm). Measurements from the starting point (left end) of the scale to the patients' marks are recorded in centimeters and are interpreted as their pain. The values can be used to track pain progression for a patient or to compare pain between patients with similar conditions. In addition to pain, the scale has also been used to evaluate mood, appetite, asthma, dyspepsia, and ambulation.
From baseline (Day 1) to Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Abderrahmane Laadem, MD, Celgene Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

September 4, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe