- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00756678
Efficacy and Acceptability of Two Lubricant Eye Drops
September 22, 2011 updated by: Allergan
Efficacy and acceptability of two new artificial tears following two weeks of treatment in patients with dry eye.
Patients will be randomized to 1 of 2 treatments for 7 days then crossover to the alternate treatment for 7 days.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
51
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or Female
- At least 18 years of age
- Current use of artificial tears
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any uncontrolled systemic disease
- Pregnancy or planning a pregnancy
- Contact lens wear
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Carboxymethylcellulose and Glycerin
|
1 drop in both eyes as needed for 7 days'
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Polyethylene glycol 400
|
1 drop in both eyes as needed for 7 days
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Frequency of Eye Drop Use Over 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Mean frequency of eye drop use per day per patient during the cross-over period over 1 week.
Eye drop use was captured on a daily tear diary that the patients completed.
The greater the frequency of use, the more eye drops were required to manage the patient's dry eye symptoms.
|
1 week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Dry Eye Disease Comfort Assessment Score on Day 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 16
|
Mean change from baseline in Dry Eye Disease Comfort Assessment Score at Day 16.
The Dry Eye Disease Comfort Assessment consists of one question asking the patient to rate their current overall discomfort from their dry eye symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 equals No Discomfort; 10 equals Intolerable).
The greater the negative number change from baseline, the greater the improvement in comfort.
|
Baseline, Day 16
|
|
Percentage of Positive Patient Responses to Subject Acceptability Questionnaire on Day 16
Time Frame: Day 16
|
Percentage of patients who responded "Strongly Agree" and "Agree" to Subject Acceptability Questionnaire Question 1: Overall Liked.
The Subject Acceptability Questionnaire consists of 11 multiple choice questions assessing how the patients feel about the eye drops received.
The 5 possible responses to the questionnaire are "Strongly Agree", "Agree", "Neither Agree or Disagree", "Disagree" and "Strongly Disagree".
|
Day 16
|
|
Number of Patients With Positive Responses to Subject Preference Questionnaire on Day 16
Time Frame: Day 16
|
Number of patients who marked that either Week 1 study product was more soothing or Week 2 study product was more soothing to the Overall Comfort Preference Questionnaire on Day 16 of the cross-over period.
The Subject Preference Questionnaire consists of 4 questions related to comfort, soothing, blurring and purchase preference comparing treatments received during Week 1 versus Week 2.
|
Day 16
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 19, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
September 22, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 31, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 22, 2011
Last Verified
September 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MA-OPT-08-001
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.