Rituximab for the Treatment of Refractory Inflammatory Myopathies and Refractory Myasthenia Gravis (FORCE)

December 10, 2012 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

FORCE: Rituximab (CD 20+-B Cell-depleting Monoclonal Antibody) for the Treatment of Refractory Inflammatory Myopathies With Specific Antibodies and Refractory Myasthenia Gravis

The traditional treatment of inflammatory myopathies (IM) and generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) is immunosuppressive therapy, usually beginning with corticosteroids. However, up to 70% of treated patients show an incomplete response, including 10 - 30% who are unresponsive. Corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive therapies presented also many side effects. We propose to evaluate in a pilot, open, prospective, multicentric, phase II study, the interest of rituximab in the treatment of patients with primary IM associated with specific AAb (anti-synthetase and anti-SRP AAbs), or MG (with anti-AchR AAbs), refractory to conventional therapies. Twenty fourth patients with primary IM (12 with anti-synthetase, 12 with anti-SRP AAbs), and 12 with MG will be included in the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody specific for human CD20, which targets B lymphocytes, has been first developed as biotherapy for the treatment of B lymphoma. In this context, hundred thousands patients received this drug, with a very good tolerance. Recently, interest has grown in the pivotal role of B cells for auto-immune humorally mediated diseases. Rituximab could then be a potential new biological treatment for such diseases, especially for patients refractory to conventional therapies. As a Muscular Diseases Centre, we have a large recruitment of patients with inflammatory myopathies (IM) and myasthenia gravis (MG). Although the physiopathogenesis of these two conditions differ, both can be associated with specific auto-antibodies (AAbs) and their therapeutic management is almost similar. The traditional treatment approach to IM and generalized MG is immunosuppressive therapy, usually beginning with corticosteroids. However, up to 70% of treated patients show an incomplete response, including 10 - 30% who are unresponsive. We propose to evaluate in a pilot, open, prospective, multicentric, phase II study, the interest of rituximab in the treatment of patients with primary IM associated with specific AAb (anti-synthetase and anti-SRP AAbs), or MG (with anti-AchR AAbs), refractory to conventional therapies.

Inclusions criteria are IM (as defined by the 119th European Neuromuscular Centre workshop) or generalised MG (as defined by the Texas Clinical Classification System) associated with specific AAbs (anti-synthetases (JO1, PL7 or PL12), or anti-SRP for primary IM, and anti-AchR for MG) and refractory to conventional treatments defined as an inadequate response to, or intolerable side effects with conventional treatments, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, IgIV and/or plasma exchange.

The therapeutical schema is rituximab 1000 mg, 2 times (at day 0 and 15), followed by one single injection (1000 mg) 6 months latter and end of follow up at 1 year.

The efficacy is evaluated by an improvement of Kendall's muscular testing or MG muscular score at month 12. Secondary criteria include Kendall's muscular testing or MG muscular score at day 21 and month 7, quality of life auto-questionnaire (SF 36), evolution of CK levels and AAb titers.

Twenty fourth patients with primary IM (12 with anti-synthetase, 12 with anti-SRP AAbs), and 12 with MG will be included in the study. If a success is observed in at least 6 patients, it will be possible to conclude that the response rate is above 25% (lower 90% confidence interval for observed response rate 50%).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75651 Cedex 13
        • Service de Médecine Interne 1 / Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For myositis III. Idiopathic myositis

    1. Myositis as defined by the 119th ENMC:

      1. Proximal myopathy with weakness
      2. Subacute or insidious onset over 18 years
      3. Myogenic syndrome on EMG (optional)
      4. Muscle fibre necrosis and regeneration and/or inflammatory cell infiltrate on muscular biopsy
    2. Specific AAbs : anti-synthetases (anti-JO1, anti-PL7, or anti-PL12), or anti-SRP.

      IV. Refractory to the conventional treatments Resistance to conventional treatments is defined as an inadequate response to, or intolerable side effects with conventional treatments, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, IgIV and/or plasma exchange. At least one or more of these drugs or therapeutical approaches (used alone or as a combination) must have been unsuccessfully tested before inclusion. Inadequate response is defined as the lack of improvement and/or the degradation of evaluation parameters (defined bellow) despite these conventional therapies, that led to a modification or a reintroduction of treatment.

  • For myasthenia III. Generalised MG

Generalised seropositive MG as defined by the Texas Clinical Classification System:

  1. Extraocular muscle weakness quantified with MG muscle score (MMS), whose inter and inter observer reproducibility has been demonstrated [44].
  2. Specific AAbs : anti-AchR IV. Refractory to the conventional treatments Resistance to conventional treatments is defined as an inadequate response to, or intolerable side effects with conventional treatments, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, IgIV and/or plasma exchange. At least one or more of these drugs or therapeutical approaches (used alone or as a combination) must have been unsuccessfully tested before inclusion. Inadequate response is defined as the lack of improvement and/or the degradation of evaluation parameters (defined bellow) despite these conventional therapies, that led to a modification or a reintroduction of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other muscular diseases, such as:

    1. Inclusion body myositis
    2. Macrophagic myofasciitis
    3. Inherited myopathies
  • Secondary IM to one other connective tissue disorders

    1. Systemic scleroderma (ARA and/or "LEROY AND MEDSGER" criteria)
    2. Sjögren's syndrome (European criteria)
    3. Systemic lupus erythematosus (ACR criteria)
    4. Rheumatoid arthritis (ACR criteria)
    5. Mixed connective tissue disease (ACR criteria)
  • Other myasthenic syndrome, such as:

    1. Non generalised, ocular MG
    2. Lambert Eaton syndrome
    3. MG associated with malignant thymoma
    4. Inherited myasthenic syndrome
  • Cancer (or cancer-associated myositis)
  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • HIV seropositivity
  • Evolutive infection (B, C hepatitis, tuberculosis)
  • Lack of approved consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Rituximab 1000 mg intravenous, 2 times, 2 weeks apart and 1000 mg 6 months after the last injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Score of muscular strength (Kendall's muscular testing for myositis or MG muscular score for myasthenia)
Time Frame: at month 12
at month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
- Score of muscular strength (Kendall's muscular testing for myositis or MG muscular score for myasthenia)
Time Frame: at day 21 and month 12
at day 21 and month 12
- Improvement of functional scale score (SF36)
Time Frame: at day 21 and month 12
at day 21 and month 12
- Decrease of CK levels
Time Frame: at day 21 and month 12
at day 21 and month 12
- Evolution of auto-antibody titers
Time Frame: at day 21 and month 12
at day 21 and month 12
- Improvement of extra-muscular activity of the disease such as the level of lung involvement by pulmonary function tests
Time Frame: at day 21 and month 12
at day 21 and month 12
- Improvement in the treatment burden defined as the possibility to decrease the dose or stop some of the drugs used at entry
Time Frame: at day 21 and month 12
at day 21 and month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier BENVENISTE, PUPH, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe