Improving Balance in Frail Elderly

February 1, 2013 updated by: Nancy Mayo, McGill University

Improving Balance in Frail Elderly: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Two Methods to Enhance Strength (Stretch and Strength Versus Core Strength)

The objective of this pilot study is to estimate, for a frail elderly population, the extent to which balance improves following a Core-Strength training program in comparison to a Stretch & Strength program. A secondary objective is to explore the impact of core strength training on urinary incontinence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomized to one of the two exercise groups, Core-Strength training group or the Stretch & Strength group. The exercises will consist of 15-20 minute session for every day they attend the GDH. Measures will be made at admission, after 6 weeks of the program and at discharge if more than past 6 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A-1A1
        • McGill University-Royal Victoria Hospital Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • elderly persons attending the geriatric day hospital at the royal victoria hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • persons who are not medically fit to participate in the Geriatric day hospital physiotherapy component.
  • the individuals at high risk for falls

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: core
strength training of the core muscles.
We have devised a series of core strength training exercises that can be easily and safely performed under the supervision of trained staff. The exercises will be individualized depending on the participants' ability and health conditions. The majority, but not all, of exercises will be performed on or with exercise balls of different sizes and shapes, round for more advanced persons and oval for more frail persons.
No Intervention: stretch and strength
This program consists of general stretching exercises and peripheral muscle strengthening exercises with a special emphasis on strengthening the upper extremity muscles because of their importance for ADL but not necessarily balance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
baseline, 6 weeks, discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Functional walking capacity 6 minute walk test
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
Gait speed
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
Bridge Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
Baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, Discharge
Baseline, 6 weeks, Discharge
International Consultation on Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire- Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, discharge
Baseline, 6 weeks, discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SDR-06--010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe