Antibiotic/COPD in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

February 20, 2020 updated by: Pr. Semir Nouira, University of Monastir

Antibiotic Comparison Exacerbation COPD

Although the use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is largely accepted, controversy remains regarding whether the choice of antibiotic has any impact on outcome. Our aim was to compare the effects of the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin in patients treated for severe COPD exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Antibiotic therapy has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although recent guidelines support the use of new antibiotics there is no evidence that newer antibiotics are any better than older agents. The choice of antibiotic to be used in this situation is challenging to the clinician who must choose between traditional antibiotics (cyclins, aminopénicillins, cotrimoxazole...) and new antimicrobial agents. Indeed, available comparative studies did not show an obvious superiority of new antibiotics compared to their predecessors . Taking into account bacterial agents associated to COPD exacerbations, one must choose an antibiotic which has the best activity against Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Branhamella catarrhalis. News quinolones are represented as an interesting alternative to standard antibiotics because of their large spectrum of action and of their pharmacokinetic advantages allowing high tissue penetration in the pulmonary parenchyma and tracheobronchial tree. Data on their use among patients having moderate exacerbation of COPD are encouraging but their effectiveness in more severe presentations is not established. The objective of this randomized controlled and double blind study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of ciprofloxacin compared to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole in patients admitted to ICU for severe exacerbation of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients having a COPD (according to the definition of the American Thoracic Society) and having an acute exacerbation leading to an acute respiratory failure requiring the admission to ICU and mechanical ventilation.
  • The acute exacerbation of COPD is defined by increase in the frequency of cough, the volume and the purulence of expectoration and increase of baseline dyspnea. To be included, patients must have respiratory rate >30 cycles/min and one of the following blood gas criteria (with blood gases performed right before the initiation of mechanical ventilation): PaC02 > 6kPa and arterial pH <7.30.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pneumonia documented with chest radiography
  • Antibiotic treatment in the ten previous days of ICU admission
  • Former inclusion in the study
  • History of allergy to the quinolones and/or to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Severe chronic disease: heart, liver, kidney.
  • Known immunodeficiency (malignant hemopathy, AIDS...)
  • Digestive disease which could affect the absorption of the drugs
  • Concomitant infection which requires systemic antibiotic treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ciprofloxacin
750 mg a day during 10 days
1500 mg a day for 10 days
Other Names:
  • fluoroquinolone
Active Comparator: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
2000 mg a day for 10 days
2000 mg a day for 10 days
Other Names:
  • bactrim
  • sulfatrim

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Two major criteria will be used for the determination of sample size and the estimate of the effectiveness of the treatments of the study: 1. mortality (in ICU and in the hospital) 2. rate of additional antibiotherapy course.
Time Frame: 30 day after starting protocol
The decision to initiate new antibiotics was left to the discretion of the treating physician, and if resistant species were cultured, the protocol treatment was not systematically changed unless the clinical course of the patient worsened
30 day after starting protocol

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mechanical ventilation duration
Time Frame: 30 days after starting protocol
duration of mechanical ventilation
30 days after starting protocol
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days after starting protocol
duration of hospital stay
30 days after starting protocol

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: nouira semir, MD, research unit 04/UR/08-20

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe