Reduced Intensity Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Relapsed Neuroblastoma After Autologous Transplantation

October 17, 2016 updated by: Samsung Medical Center

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Reduced-intensity Conditioning in Children With Neuroblastoma Who Have Failed a Prior Autologous Transplantation

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIST) with RIC regimen in children with neuroblastoma who have failed a prior autologous stem cell transplantation. The investigators will investigate the potential of RIC regimen in inducing antitumor response if the present protocol will indeed reduce the early TRM and allow for sustained donor chimerism.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The prognosis of high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) after conventional chemoradiotherapy is very poor. Therefore, a strategy using high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDCT/auto-SCT) has been explored to improve the prognosis of patients with high-risk NB. The results of randomized trials comparing HDCT/auto-SCT with chemotherapy alone showed a better event-free survival (EFS) in the auto-SCT arm than in the continuous chemotherapy arm. However, the overall EFS was still unsatisfactory. In this context, investigators have examined the efficacy of double or triple tandem auto-SCT to further improve the outcome of high-risk NB patients. George et al. carried out a single arm trial of tandem auto-SCT as consolidation therapy, and reported improved long-term survival (5-year progression-free survival 47%) with acceptable toxicity. Kletzel et al. also conducted a single arm trial of triple tandem auto-SCT and reported improved survival (3-year EFS 57%). Investigators in the present study also carried out tandem auto-SCT as consolidation therapy, and reported improved long-term survival (5-year progression-free survival 62%) with acceptable toxicity. However, unfortunately, tumor relapses in many patients even after tandem auto-SCT.

The major cause of treatment failure following auto-SCT remains relapse of the underlying disease. Additional chemotherapy after relapse in these patients have been ineffective, and therefore, new treatment strategies are warranted. In this context, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has been tried as salvage treatment in patients with NB who have failed a prior auto-SCT. Allo-SCT would theoretically be preferable in term of relapse-free survival because this has an antitumor effect due to a graft versus tumor (GVT) effect which is absent in auto-SCT. The graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect represents a widely accepted major component of allo-SCT, and there is emerging evidence also for a GVT effect in solid tumor. GVT effect was also demonstrated in patient with advanced NB who received HLA haplo-identical allo-SCT.

Generally, allo-SCT carries a lower risk of relapse, However, it has a much higher early treatment-related mortality (TRM) compared to auto-SCT. TRM rate in allo-SCT is especially high in patients who have failed a prior auto-SCT. The 1-year TRM rate following a conventional (ie myeloablative) allo-SCT in adult recipients of a prior auto-SCT has been reported as high as 50-85%. In children, transplantation-related toxicity was also one of the major obstacles in conventional allo-SCT because they had been already heavily treated prior to allo-SCT. Therefore, this salvage strategy has showed a limited success in the majority of children with relapsed NB who have failed a prior single or tandem auto-SCT, although allo-SCT is supposed to be the only curative treatment in patients. Only a small proportion of these patients have the opportunity to successfully undergo this treatment.

In recent years, several groups of investigators have developed non-myeloablative reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen, which lead to engraftment of donor lymphoid and hematopoietic stem cells without the extra-hematopoietic toxicities of traditional myeloablative transplantations while conserving the GVL or GVT effect after transplantation. This reduced toxicity may make these RIC regimens especially suitable for patients with high-risk of TRM, in particular recipients of second or third transplantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 20 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with NB who have failed a prior auto-SCT will be eligible for the present study. Patients should have no severe comorbid organ dysfunction (NCI grade > 2 organ toxicity) at enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe comorbid organ dysfunction (NCI grade > 2 organ toxicity) prior to RIST will be off the present study.
  • Patients with progressed tumor prior to RIST will be off the present study.
  • Patients whose parents do not want to undergo RIST will be off the present study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
tumor response, overall survival, event-free survival
Time Frame: from 1 year after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
from 1 year after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 19, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe