- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00797849
Controlled Study of Farabloc for Chronic Phantom Limb Pain Among Veteran Amputees
A Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Farabloc for Chronic Phantom Limb Pain Among Veteran Amputees
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Phantom limb pain (PLP)is a painful sensation perceived in the missing limb after amputation and may be triggered by episodes of stump pain. A growing body of literature indicates that 50-80% of amputees may have PLP. Farabloc cloth is a noninvasive, alternative therapy developed by Farabloc Development Corporation for use by amputees with PLP. The Farabloc Corporation will be donating them to the VA Long Beach for use in this study without charge. Farabloc is a non-toxic and non-invasive treatment with promising preliminary pilot data. Metallic fibers consisting mainly of iron (85.3%) and nickel (10.0%) are woven into a nylon fabric that can be custom made into socks, gloves, limb covers, etc. Farabloc can be laminated into the socket and in the design of the prosthetic without weakening or adding significant weight to it. The exact mechanism of action is unknown for Farabloc, however, it is theorized that the fabric shields high frequency electromagnetic fields that may cause cellular damage and subsequent pain.
Subjects over 18 will be recruited from the VA Long Beach Prosthetic Clinic. Eligible subjects who are interested to participate, will be scheduled for a screening visit. Written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment. Enrolled subjects will be randomly assigned to either the Farabloc or sham Farabloc group. Assignment is double-blind to study participants, prosthetist, Farabloc Corporation and the research assistant throughout the study. Only the project coordinator and PI will know the random assignment.
Farabloc intervention will consist of wearing prosthetics laminated with Farabloc surrounding the liner or, if not wearing prosthetics, subject will wear Farabloc sock or glove over shrinker. Sham intervention will consist of wearing prosthetics laminated with sham fabric surrounding the liner or, if not wearing prosthetics, subject will wear sock or glove made of sham fabric over shrinker. All subjects will receive at least two socks.
Data for PLP pain levels and health-related quality of life will be collected during baseline, 6-week, 12-week and 1-month post treatment follow-up. Research staff will administer these surveys and collect data in person. The amount of health care utilization will be measured 12-week prior ot enrollment and 12-week follow-up. Monitoring adherence to protocol by phone call will be made during the treatment at 3-week and 9-week followup.
Study participants will receive a total of $50 for their participation in this study ($20 for baseline and $10 for each of the three follow-up visits). At the end of the study, participants can choose to keep the active or sham Farabloc. If the true Farabloc turns out to be an effective treatment for phantom limb pain, subjects assigned to the sham Farabloc intervention will b offered the option to be treated with true Farabloc free of charge aftr conclusion of the study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, United States, 90822-5201
- VA Long Beach Healthcare System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Upper or lower extremity amputees with healed stumps
- Experience episodes or intermittent PLP
- At least 3 episodes of PLP during the previous 6 weeks
- Have not used Farabloc within the last 6 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women are excluded from the study
- Stump complications (e.g., cellulites and stump pain caused by new bone spur within the past 12 months
- Previous use of Farabloc within 6 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1
Wear prosthetics laminated with Farabloc surrounding the liner.
If not wearing prosthetics, subject needs to wear Farabloc sock or glove over shrinker.
|
Wear prosthetics, sock or glove laminated with Farabloc
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: 2
Wear prosthetics laminated with sham material surrounding the liner.
If not wearing prosthetics, subject needs to wear sock or glove over shrinker.
|
Wear prosthetics, sock or glove laminated with sham material
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
The primary outcome will be pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
Time Frame: Measurements will be obtained at baseline, and 6-week and 12-week follow-ups
|
Measurements will be obtained at baseline, and 6-week and 12-week follow-ups
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
A secondary outcome will measure health-related quality of life using the 36-item Sort Form Health Survey (SF-36).
Time Frame: The assessment will be conducted at pretest, 6-week, 12-week and 1-month post treatment.
|
The assessment will be conducted at pretest, 6-week, 12-week and 1-month post treatment.
|
Measurement of health care utilization will be conducted by comparing the numbers of outpatient visits emergency room visits and inpatient hospitalizations using the VA electronic medical system CPRS.
Time Frame: At 12-week pretreatment and 12-week follow-up.
|
At 12-week pretreatment and 12-week follow-up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: An-Fu Hsiao, M.D., Ph.D., VA Long Beach Healthcare System
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
- Ephraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ, Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;86(10):1910-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.031.
- Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Elzinga A, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. 2000 Jul;87(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00264-5.
- Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Stewart R, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and risk factors: a multivariate analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Dec;24(6):578-85. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00538-9.
- McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.
- Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00101-3.
- Adams PF, Hendershot GE, Marano MA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1996. Vital Health Stat 10. 1999 Oct;(200):1-203.
- Ephraim PL, Dillingham TR, Sector M, Pezzin LE, Mackenzie EJ. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;84(5):747-61. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04932-8.
- Potter BK, Scoville CR. Amputation is not isolated: an overview of the US Army Amputee Patient Care Program and associated amputee injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(10 Spec No.):S188-90. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200600001-00041.
- Lin DL, Kirk KL, Murphy KP, McHale KA, Doukas WC. Evaluation of orthopaedic injuries in Operation Enduring Freedom. J Orthop Trauma. 2004 May-Jun;18(5):300-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200405000-00006.
- Islinger RB, Kuklo TR, McHale KA. A review of orthopedic injuries in three recent U.S. military conflicts. Mil Med. 2000 Jun;165(6):463-5.
- Korver AJ. Amputees in a hospital of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Injury. 1993 Oct;24(9):607-9. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90124-o.
- Sherman RA. Phantom limb pain. Mechanism-based management. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994 Jan;11(1):85-106.
- Richardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, Horgan M. Incidence of phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin J Pain. 2006 May;22(4):353-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000177793.01415.bd.
- Whyte A, Niven CA. The illusive phantom: does primary care meet patient need following limb loss? Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jul 22-Aug 5;26(14-15):894-900. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001708904.
- Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Parker L. Chronic phantom and stump pain among American veterans: results of a survey. Pain. 1984 Jan;18(1):83-95. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90128-3.
- Wartan SW, Hamann W, Wedley JR, McColl I. Phantom pain and sensation among British veteran amputees. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Jun;78(6):652-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.6.652.
- Amir R, Devor M. Ongoing activity in neuroma afferents bearing retrograde sprouts. Brain Res. 1993 Dec 10;630(1-2):283-8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90667-c.
- Jain N, Florence SL, Kaas JH. Reorganization of Somatosensory Cortex After Nerve and Spinal Cord Injury. News Physiol Sci. 1998 Jun;13:143-149. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.1998.13.3.143.
- Flor H, Elbert T, Muhlnickel W, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Taub E. Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Mar;119(2):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s002210050334.
- Chabal C, Jacobson L, Russell LC, Burchiel KJ. Pain responses to perineuromal injection of normal saline, gallamine, and lidocaine in humans. Pain. 1989 Mar;36(3):321-325. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90091-2.
- Parkes CM. Factors determining the persistence of phantom pain in the amputee. J Psychosom Res. 1973 Mar;17(2):97-108. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(73)90010-x. No abstract available.
- Shukla GD, Sahu SC, Tripathi RP, Gupta DK. Phantom limb: a phenomenological study. Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;141:54-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.141.1.54.
- Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):387-392. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90133-3.
- Kazis LE, Ren XS, Lee A, Skinner K, Rogers W, Clark J, Miller DR. Health status in VA patients: results from the Veterans Health Study. Am J Med Qual. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):28-38. doi: 10.1177/106286069901400105.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- #871
- Contract 1 EA-0000078
- Subaward for W81XWH-06-1-0279
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Phantom Limb Pain
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabCoapt, LLCRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom Pain | Phantom Sensation | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Artur BiktimirovEnrolling by invitationAmputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Lower Limb Amputation | Phantom PainRussian Federation
-
United States Naval Medical Center, San DiegoUnknownPhantom Limb Pain | Phantom Pain | Phantom Sensation | PseudomeliaUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingChronic Pain | Lower Limb Amputation | Phantom Pain | Upper Limb Amputation | Phantom Limb Pain After AmputationUnited States
-
Artur BiktimirovEnrolling by invitationAmputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom PainRussian Federation
-
Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique...CompletedAmputation | Phantom Pain Following Amputation of Lower LimbFrance
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedPhantom Limb Pain | Residual Limb PainUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoVarian Medical Systems; Epimed InternationalRecruitingAmputation, Traumatic | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom Pain Following Amputation of Lower Limb | Amputation, SurgicalUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingPhantom Pain Following Amputation of Lower LimbEgypt
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedAmputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Residual Limb PainUnited States
Clinical Trials on Farabloc Limb Cover
-
University of British ColumbiaUnknown
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedProblem Behavior | Dementia, Alzheimer TypeUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineCompletedBack Pain | InsomniaUnited States
-
Weizhuo YiCompletedSchizophrenia Relapse | Light PollutionChina
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedRole-expectancy on Patient Reported OutcomesGermany
-
Osiris TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Osiris TherapeuticsTerminatedDiabetic Foot UlcersUnited States
-
Maltepe UniversityCompletedNursing Caries | Neonatal DiseaseTurkey
-
G Medical Innovations Ltd.Unknown
-
Nfocus NeuromedicalUnknownIntracranial Aneurysms | Cavernous Carotid Fistula | Vertebrobasilar FistulaGermany