Safety Study That Compares Perlane to Perlane With Lidocaine (Perlane-L) While Correcting Wrinkles in the Area Around Your Nose

November 1, 2010 updated by: Medicis Global Service Corporation

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Safety and Tolerability of Perlane® With and Without Addition of 0.3% Lidocaine HCL During Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Safety study that compares Perlane to Perlane with Lidocaine while correcting wrinkles in the area around your nose.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a split-face design. All 60 subjects receive Perlane on one side of their face, and Perlane-L on the other. Subjects and the investigator is blinded to which side of face receives which product. These are one time injections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States
    • Maryland
      • Hunt Valley, Maryland, United States
    • New York
      • Mount Cisco, New York, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Same Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale score at both Nasolabial Folds (either both Moderate [3] or both Severe [4])

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active or chronic skin disease, inflammation or related conditions, near or on the Nasolabial Folds
  • Subjects who had undergone procedures based on active dermal response (e.g., laser or chemical peeling procedures) within 6 months prior to study entry
  • Use of any facial tissue augmenting therapy with non-permanent filler or aesthetic facial surgical therapy within 9 months prior to study entry
  • Permanent implant placed in the Nasolabial Fold area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Perlane and Perlane-L
This is a split-face design injecting both Perlane and Perlane-L injectable gels, administered once. Each subject received Perlane-L on one side of the face, and Perlane on the other. Subjects were blinded to which side of their face receive Perlane or Perlane-L. The study was randomized and treatments successive.
Device: Perlane and Perlane-L
This is a split face design and each subject received both Perlane-L and Perlane. Treatments were blinded, randomized, and successive.
Other Names:
  • Each subject received both Perlane-L and Perlane.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Treatment Difference in VAS (Perlane Side - Perlane-L Side) With Difference in VAS >= 10 mm
Time Frame: After Injection on Day of Treatment
After Injection on Day of Treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects Showing Wrinkle Improvement at Day 14
Time Frame: 14 days after treatment when compared to baseline
This measure was performed by the validated GAIS tool (Global Asthetic Improvement Scale). The GAIS was completed by the participant at day 14. The GAIS is a qualitative 5 point scale evaluating Aesthetic Improvement (0=worse, 1=no change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved, 4=very much improved). Treatment success is defined as at least a one grade improvement (2, 3, or 4) from pre-treatment.
14 days after treatment when compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Medicis Global Service Corporation

Collaborators

Q-Med Scandinavia, Inc.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mary Sanstead, Medicis Global Pharmaceutical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 30, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2010

Last Verified

November 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MA-1400-03

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe