- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00870467
A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
August 1, 2012 updated by: Abbott
A Phase 3 Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing Adalimumab and Placebo in Adult Japanese Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
To evaluate the potential of adalimumab to inhibit radiographic progression in joint destruction compared with placebo in adult Japanese subjects with recent onset of rheumatoid arthritis.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
This was a Phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the inhibition of radiographic progression by adalimumab compared with placebo in adult Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not been previously treated with methotrexate (MTX).
Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either a subcutaneous injection of adalimumab 40 mg or matching placebo every other week (eow) during the 26-week double-blind phase.
All participants also received 6 mg to 8 mg MTX weekly as basal treatment for their disease.
Participants who experienced an increase in disease activity (more than 20% increase in tender joint count and swollen joint count) at Week 12, 16, or 20 compared with Baseline after having increased MTX dose to 8 mg per week for at least 4 weeks were discontinued from the double-blind phase and were eligible to receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg eow as rescue treatment.
Participants who completed the 26 weeks of treatment (either double-blind study drug [adalimumab or placebo] treatment or open-label adalimumab treatment) were eligible to enter the 26-week open-label phase in which they received adalimumab 40 mg eow.
Efficacy and safety assessments were performed at Baseline and at designated study visits.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
334
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Anjo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46861
-
Aomori, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46919
-
Chiba, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46805
-
Chiba, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46806
-
Chiba, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46880
-
Chiba, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46881
-
Fuchu, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46890
-
Fukuoka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46902
-
Fukuoka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46903
-
Fukuoka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46904
-
Gifu, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46856
-
Gunma, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46944
-
Hiroshima, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46893
-
Hiroshima, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46894
-
Hokkaido, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 12161
-
Hokkaido, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46916
-
Hokkaido, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46918
-
Hyogo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46865
-
Hyogo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46871
-
Ibaraki, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46801
-
Ibaraki, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46925
-
Iwate, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46800
-
Kagoshima, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46873
-
Kagoshima, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46874
-
Kanagawa, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46845
-
Kanagawa, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46899
-
Kanagawa, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46901
-
Kanazawa, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46851
-
Kanazawa, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46852
-
Kawagoe, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46802
-
Kawasaki, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46900
-
Kirishima, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46875
-
Kitakyushu, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46870
-
Kumamoto, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46872
-
Kumamoto, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46912
-
Kyoto, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46864
-
Maebashi, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46943
-
Matsuyama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46898
-
Miyazaki, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46915
-
Nagano, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46853
-
Nagano, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46855
-
Nagasaki, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46909
-
Nagasaki, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46910
-
Nagasaki, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46911
-
Nagoya, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46858
-
Nagoya, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46860
-
Nara, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46877
-
Nara, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46885
-
Niigata, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46848
-
Niigata, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46906
-
Oita, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46914
-
Okayama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46869
-
Okayama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46886
-
Okayama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46887
-
Okayama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46892
-
Okinawa, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46876
-
Osaka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46946
-
Osaka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46947
-
Rifu, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46842
-
Sagamihara, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46846
-
Saitama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46803
-
Saitama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46804
-
Saitama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46878
-
Saitama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46879
-
Sapporo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46917
-
Shimotsuke, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46942
-
Shizuoka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46854
-
Shizuoka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46857
-
Shizuoka, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46859
-
Takamatsu, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46895
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46843
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46844
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46850
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46882
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46883
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46884
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46888
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46889
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46891
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46896
-
Toyama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46849
-
Toyama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46907
-
Toyoake, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46862
-
Toyohashi, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46866
-
Tsu, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46863
-
Tsukuba, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46926
-
Yokohama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46897
-
Yokohama, Japan
- Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46905
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Rheumatoid arthritis based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria
- Methotrexate or leflunomide naïve
- Disease duration less than or equal to 2 years from diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria
- History of acute inflammatory joint disease of different origin from rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, lymphoma, leukemia or lymphoproliferative disease, active TB, HIV
- Previously received anti-TNF therapy anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, CTLA4-Ig, anti-CD20 antibody, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, azathioprine, or tacrolimus
- Joint surgery involving joints to be assessed within 8 weeks prior to Screening
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: DB Placebo
Participants received double-blind placebo administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) for up to 26 weeks.
Participants also received concomitant methotrexate 6 to 8 mg administered orally weekly.
|
Double-blind adalimumab-matching placebo administered subcutaneously (SC)every other week (eow)
Other Names:
|
Experimental: DB adalimumab
Participants received double-blind adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) for up to 26 weeks.
Participants also received concomitant methotrexate 6 to 8 mg administered orally weekly.
|
Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow)
Other Names:
|
Experimental: DB Adalimumab/OL Adalimumab
Participants received double-blind adalimumab administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) for 26 weeks followed by open-label adalimumab 40 mg SC eow for up to 26 weeks.
Participants also received concomitant methotrexate 6 to 8 mg administered orally weekly.
|
Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow)
Other Names:
Open-label adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) after completion of the first 26 weeks in the study
Other Names:
|
Experimental: DB Placebo/OL Adalimumab
Participants received double-blind placebo administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) for 26 weeks followed by open-label adalimumab 40 mg SC eow for up to 26 weeks.
Participants received concomitant methotrexate 6 to 8 mg administered orally weekly.
|
Double-blind adalimumab-matching placebo administered subcutaneously (SC)every other week (eow)
Other Names:
Open-label adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) after completion of the first 26 weeks in the study
Other Names:
|
Experimental: DB Adalimumab/RE OL Adalimumab
Participants received double-blind adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) and then open-label adalimumab 40 mg SC eow as rescue treatment (as eligible at Week 12 or after) to complete 26 weeks, followed by open-label adalimumab 40 mg SC eow for up to 26 weeks.
Participants received concomitant methotrexate 6 to 8 mg administered orally weekly.
|
Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow)
Other Names:
Open-label adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) after completion of the first 26 weeks in the study
Other Names:
Open-label adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) as rescue treatment to complete the first 26 weeks in the study- dependent on participant eligibility (increase in disease activity), applies to Weeks 12 to 26
Other Names:
|
Experimental: DB Placebo/RE OL Adalimumab
Participants received double-blind placebo administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) and then open-label adalimumab 40 mg SC eow as rescue treatment (as eligible at Week 12 or after) to complete 26 weeks, followed by open-label adalimumab 40 mg SC eow for up to 26 weeks.
Participants received concomitant methotrexate 6 to 8 mg administered orally weekly.
|
Double-blind adalimumab-matching placebo administered subcutaneously (SC)every other week (eow)
Other Names:
Open-label adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) after completion of the first 26 weeks in the study
Other Names:
Open-label adalimumab 40 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) as rescue treatment to complete the first 26 weeks in the study- dependent on participant eligibility (increase in disease activity), applies to Weeks 12 to 26
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp X-Ray Score at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of joint health, used in evaluation of inhibition of radiographic progression of disease.
Digitized X-rays of hands and feet were obtained then scored in a blinded manner: for erosions (0 [no damage] to 5 [complete collapse or total destruction of joint]) and for joint space narrowing (0 [no damage] to 4 [complete luxation of joint]).
Scores were added, giving total mTSS (0 [normal] to 380 [maximal disease]).
Large positive change in mTSS indicates disease progression; small positive/no change indicates slowing/halting of disease progression.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria at Week 26 (ACR: American College of Rheumatology)
Time Frame: Week 26
|
Patients were ACR20 responders if they had: >= 20% improvement in both tender joint count (68 joints) and in swollen joint count (66 joints) plus >=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient's assessment of pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein.
Patients who discontinued or switched to open-label adalimumab prior to Week 26 were considered non-responders.
|
Week 26
|
Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria at Week 26 (ACR: American College of Rheumatology)
Time Frame: Week 26
|
Patients were ACR50 responders if they had: >= 50% improvement in both tender joint count (68 joints) and in swollen joint count (66 joints) plus >=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient's assessment of pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein.
Patients who discontinued or switched to open-label adalimumab prior to Week 26 were considered non-responders.
|
Week 26
|
Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria at Week 26 (ACR: American College of Rheumatology)
Time Frame: Week 26
|
Patients were ACR70 responders if they had: >= 70% improvement in both tender joint count (68 joints) and in swollen joint count (66 joints) plus >=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient's assessment of pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein.
Patients who discontinued or switched to open-label adalimumab prior to Week 26 were considered non-responders.
|
Week 26
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28[ESR]) at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
|
Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is a combined index used to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Calculation of the DAS28 score used the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
DAS28(ESR) scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 9 (maximal disease activity); decrease is indicative of improvement in disease activity.
|
Baseline, Week 26
|
Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission, Defined by Disease Activity Score (DAS28[ESR]) <2.6, at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
|
Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is a combined index used to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Calculation of the DAS28 score used the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
DAS28(ESR) scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 9 (maximal disease activity); decrease is indicative of improvement in disease activity.
DAS28(ESR) score <2.6 was defined as clinical remission of disease.
|
Week 26
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Any Adverse Event (Serious or Non-serious) on Double-blind Study Drug Through Week 26
Time Frame: Through Week 26
|
Adverse events were collected at designated study visits for all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug.
The number of participants who experienced any adverse event (serious or non-serious) while receiving double-blind study drug is summarized.
See the Reported Adverse Event section for details.
|
Through Week 26
|
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp X-Ray Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of joint health, used in evaluation of inhibition of radiographic progression of disease.
Digitized X-rays of hands and feet were obtained then scored in a blinded manner: for erosions (0 [no damage] to 5 [complete collapse or total destruction of joint]) and for joint space narrowing (0 [no damage] to 4 [complete luxation of joint]).
Scores were added, giving total mTSS score (0 [normal] to 380 [maximal disease]).
Large positive change in mTSS indicates diseae progression; small positive/no change indicates slowing/halting of disease progression.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
Number of Participants Meeting ACR20 Response Criteria at Week 52 (ACR: American College of Rheumatology)
Time Frame: Week 52
|
Patients were ACR20 responders if they had: >=20% improvement in both tender joint count (68 joints) and in swollen joint count (66 joints) plus >=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient's assessment of pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein.
|
Week 52
|
Number of Participants Meeting ACR50 Response Criteria at Week 52 (ACR: American College of Rheumatology)
Time Frame: Week 52
|
Patients were ACR50 responders if they had: >=50% improvement in both tender joint count (68 joints) and in swollen joint count (66 joints) plus >=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient's assessment of pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein.
|
Week 52
|
Number of Participants Meeting ACR70 Response Criteria at Week 52 (ACR: American College of Rheumatology)
Time Frame: Week 52
|
Patients were ACR70 responders if they had: >=70% improvement in both tender joint count (68 joints) and in swollen joint count (66 joints) plus >=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient's assessment of pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ); and acute phase reactant C-reactive protein.
|
Week 52
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28[ESR]) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
|
Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is a combined index used to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Calculation of the DAS28 score used the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
DAS28(ESR) scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 9 (maximal disease activity); decrease is indicative of improvement in disease activity.
|
Baseline, Week 52
|
Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission, Defined by Disease Activity Score (DAS28[ESR]) <2.6, at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
|
Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is a combined index used to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Calculation of the DAS28 score used the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
DAS28(ESR) scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 9 (maximal disease activity); decrease is indicative of improvement in disease activity.
DAS28(ESR) score <2.6 was defined as clinical remission of disease.
|
Week 52
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Any Adverse Event (Serious or Non-serious) While Receiving Adalimumab Through Week 52
Time Frame: Through Week 52
|
Adverse events were collected at designated study visits for all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of adalimumab.
The number of participants who experienced any adverse event (serious or non-serious) while receiving any adalimumab during the study (double-blind adalimumab and/or open-label) is summarized.
See the Reported Adverse Event section for details.
|
Through Week 52
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Hiroshi Ukai, BS, Abbott Japan Co.,Ltd
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Burmester GR, Landewe R, Genovese MC, Friedman AW, Pfeifer ND, Varothai NA, Lacerda AP. Adalimumab long-term safety: infections, vaccination response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):414-417. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209322. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
- Yamanaka H, Ishiguro N, Takeuchi T, Miyasaka N, Mukai M, Matsubara T, Uchida S, Akama H, Kupper H, Arora V, Tanaka Y. Recovery of clinical but not radiographic outcomes by the delayed addition of adalimumab to methotrexate-treated Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: 52-week results of the HOPEFUL-1 trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 May;53(5):904-13. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket465. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 26, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
March 27, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
August 7, 2012
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 1, 2012
Last Verified
August 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- M06-859
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal...Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiCompleted
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis | Juvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisMexico
-
Hamad Medical CorporationUnknownRHEUMATOID ARTHRITISQatar
Clinical Trials on Double-blind Placebo
-
Suzhou Connect Biopharmaceuticals, Ltd.CompletedModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisUnited States, China, Pakistan, Ukraine
-
NeoImmuneTechNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); University of...Terminated
-
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LimitedCompletedScalp PsoriasisUnited States, Australia
-
McMaster UniversityAllerGen NCE Inc.Unknown
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.CompletedIrritable Bowel Syndrome With DiarrheaUnited States, United Kingdom, Germany
-
Tokyo UniversityJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.CompletedAutoimmune Diseases | Collagen Diseases | Scleroderma, Systemic | Lung Fibrosis | Skin SclerosisJapan
-
Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBAWithdrawnMulti-drug Resistant TuberculosisChina, Ukraine, Taiwan, Korea, Republic of, Peru, Brazil, Estonia, Latvia, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, Georgia, Mexico, Cambodia, Ethiopia
-
AbbottCompletedArthritis, Juvenile IdiopathicUnited States, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Slovakia, Spain
-
University of RochesterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)CompletedHyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis | Hypokalemic Periodic ParalysisUnited States, Italy, United Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineTerminatedColitis, UlcerativeUnited States, Netherlands, Ukraine, Estonia, Poland, France, Japan, Russian Federation, Slovakia, South Africa, United Kingdom, India, Bulgaria, Czechia, Serbia