- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00494507
Hyper- and Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis Study (HYP-HOP)
Dichlorphenamide vs. Placebo for Periodic Paralysis
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Periodic paralysis is a relatively rare, life-long disorder characterized by intermittent bouts of paralysis, progressive weakness, and diminished quality of life. Two drugs, acetazolamide (ACZ) and dichlorphenamide, have been prescribed to treat the disorder, however, dichlorphenamide is no longer available.
In this multi-center, parallel, randomized trial researchers will compare the effects of dichlorphenamide vs. placebo in patients with hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis.
The trial consists of two 9-week studies-one study will enroll persons with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis and the other study will enroll persons with hypokalemic periodic paralysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: dichlorphenamide or placebo (an inactive substance). During the studies, participants will be asked to keep a daily diary to record the time, length, and severity of each episode of weakness (attack). The study coordinator will contact participants weekly to review the diary information.
The 9-week phase will be followed by a 1-year open-label dichlorphenamide extension without placebo to determine the long-term effects of dichlorphenamide on the course of the disease and on inter-attack weakness.
Duration of the trial for participants is approximately 65 weeks, including a screening phase to determine eligibility, the first 9-week treatment phase, and the one-year open-label extension phase.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Milan
-
San Donato, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Neurology-Queen's Square
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- UCLA Neurology
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- University of California-San Francisco
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- University Of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Brigham & Women'S Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University School of Medicine
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Medical Center
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
- University of Rochester
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- Ohio State University
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- University of Texas Southwestern-Dallas
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Genetically definite, clinically definite or clinically probable Hyperkalemic or Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis as outlined in the protocol
- Male and female participants, age 18 and older who are able to comply with the study conditions.
- Participants who have distinct regular episodes of weakness with an average frequency of > or = to 1 a week and < or = to 3 a day either on or off treatment, whichever is higher
- Normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level
Exclusion Criteria:
Evidence for Andersen-Tawil syndrome (any one of the following 3 criteria)
- Prolonged QT interval or complex ventricular ectopy between attacks
Distinctive physical features (2 of the following 5)
- Low set ears
- Short stature
- Hypo-/micrognathia
- Clinodactyly
- Hypo-/hypertelorism
- KIR 2.1 gene mutation
- Coincidental renal, hepatic, active thyroid disease, restrictive or obstructive lung disease, other neuromuscular disease, or heart disease
- Chronic, non-congestive, angle-closure glaucoma
- Use of any of the following medications for reasons other than treatment of periodic paralysis: diuretics, antiarrhythmics, corticosteroids, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics, magnesium
- History of life-threatening episodes of respiratory muscle weakness or cardiac arrhythmias during attacks
- Pregnancy
- Known mutation in the alpha subunit of the sodium channel gene in hypokalemic periodic paralysis patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: HYP Dichlorphenamide
Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase.
All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
|
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: HYP Placebo
Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase.
All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
|
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet
|
Active Comparator: HOP Dichlorphenamide
Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase.
All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
|
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: HOP Placebo
Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase.
All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
|
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
HYP Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HYP participants.
|
8 weeks
|
HOP Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HOP participants.
|
8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
HYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
HYP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
|
8 weeks
|
HOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
HOP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
|
8 weeks
|
HYP Attack Duration
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
HYP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
|
8 weeks
|
HOP Attack Duration
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
HOP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
|
8 weeks
|
HYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening
Time Frame: 0-9 weeks
|
Increase in attack frequency or severity in HYP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
|
0-9 weeks
|
HOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening
Time Frame: 0-9 weeks
|
Increase in attack frequency or severity in HOP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
|
0-9 weeks
|
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength. The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor. |
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength. The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor. |
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right). |
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right). |
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right). |
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome. The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right). |
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
|
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
|
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life.
The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE).
The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP,BP, and GH.
Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score.
Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
|
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life.
The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE).
The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP, BP, and GH.
Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score.
Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
|
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life.
The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE).
The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE.
Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score.
Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
|
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life.
The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE).
The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE.
Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score.
Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
|
Baseline and 9 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert C. Griggs, M.D., University of Rochester
- Principal Investigator: Rabi Tawil, M.D., Co-Principal Investigator, University of Rochester
- Michael McDermott, Ph.D., Biostatistician, University of Rochester
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Metabolic Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Metal Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Paralyses, Familial Periodic
- Paralysis
- Paralysis, Hyperkalemic Periodic
- Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
- Dichlorphenamide
Other Study ID Numbers
- R01NS045686-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- CRC (NINDS)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis
-
Grete Andersen, MDCompletedHyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis | Myotonia Congenita | Paramyotonia Congenita | Dystrophia Myotonica Type 1 | Potassium-Aggravated MyotoniaDenmark
-
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)Ohio State UniversityCompletedParalysis, Hyperkalemic Periodic | Paramyotonia Congenita | Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis
-
West China HospitalUnknownThyrotoxic Periodic Paralysis
-
Ramathibodi HospitalCompletedThyrotoxic Periodic Paralysis
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...RecruitingPeriodic ParalysesFrance
-
University College, LondonTerminated
-
Zydus Lifesciences LimitedCompletedCryopyrin Associated Periodic SyndromeAustralia
-
Inflazome UK LtdCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Cryopyrin Associated Periodic SyndromeAustralia
-
Federal University of São PauloFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Associação Fundo de Incentivo...CompletedPeriodic Limb Movements in SleepBrazil
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisInstitut ImagineNot yet recruitingAutoinflammatory Disease | FMF | TRAPS | MKD | Cryopyrin Associated Periodic Syndrome | HaploinsufficiencyFrance
Clinical Trials on Dichlorphenamide (double-blind)
-
Suzhou Connect Biopharmaceuticals, Ltd.CompletedModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisUnited States, China, Pakistan, Ukraine
-
NeoImmuneTechNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); University of...Terminated
-
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries LimitedCompletedScalp PsoriasisUnited States, Australia
-
McMaster UniversityAllerGen NCE Inc.Unknown
-
Tokyo UniversityJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.CompletedAutoimmune Diseases | Collagen Diseases | Scleroderma, Systemic | Lung Fibrosis | Skin SclerosisJapan
-
Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBAWithdrawnMulti-drug Resistant TuberculosisChina, Ukraine, Taiwan, Korea, Republic of, Peru, Brazil, Estonia, Latvia, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, Georgia, Mexico, Cambodia, Ethiopia
-
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)Ohio State UniversityCompletedParalysis, Hyperkalemic Periodic | Paramyotonia Congenita | Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.CompletedIrritable Bowel Syndrome With DiarrheaUnited States, United Kingdom, Germany
-
AbbottCompletedArthritis, Juvenile IdiopathicUnited States, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Slovakia, Spain
-
AstraZenecaCompletedGastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)United States, France, Poland, Germany