Hyper- and Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis Study (HYP-HOP)

May 15, 2017 updated by: Robert Griggs, MD, University of Rochester

Dichlorphenamide vs. Placebo for Periodic Paralysis

The purpose of this study is to compare Dichlorphenamide with placebo (an inactive substance) for prevention of episodes and for improvement of strength in hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis. This study will also look at the long-term effects of Dichlorphenamide in periodic paralysis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Periodic paralysis is a relatively rare, life-long disorder characterized by intermittent bouts of paralysis, progressive weakness, and diminished quality of life. Two drugs, acetazolamide (ACZ) and dichlorphenamide, have been prescribed to treat the disorder, however, dichlorphenamide is no longer available.

In this multi-center, parallel, randomized trial researchers will compare the effects of dichlorphenamide vs. placebo in patients with hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis.

The trial consists of two 9-week studies-one study will enroll persons with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis and the other study will enroll persons with hypokalemic periodic paralysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: dichlorphenamide or placebo (an inactive substance). During the studies, participants will be asked to keep a daily diary to record the time, length, and severity of each episode of weakness (attack). The study coordinator will contact participants weekly to review the diary information.

The 9-week phase will be followed by a 1-year open-label dichlorphenamide extension without placebo to determine the long-term effects of dichlorphenamide on the course of the disease and on inter-attack weakness.

Duration of the trial for participants is approximately 65 weeks, including a screening phase to determine eligibility, the first 9-week treatment phase, and the one-year open-label extension phase.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Milan
      • San Donato, Milan, Italy
        • University of Milan
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Institute of Neurology-Queen's Square
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Neurology
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California-San Francisco
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University Of Kansas Medical Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham & Women'S Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern-Dallas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Genetically definite, clinically definite or clinically probable Hyperkalemic or Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis as outlined in the protocol
  • Male and female participants, age 18 and older who are able to comply with the study conditions.
  • Participants who have distinct regular episodes of weakness with an average frequency of > or = to 1 a week and < or = to 3 a day either on or off treatment, whichever is higher
  • Normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence for Andersen-Tawil syndrome (any one of the following 3 criteria)

    1. Prolonged QT interval or complex ventricular ectopy between attacks
    2. Distinctive physical features (2 of the following 5)

      1. Low set ears
      2. Short stature
      3. Hypo-/micrognathia
      4. Clinodactyly
      5. Hypo-/hypertelorism
    3. KIR 2.1 gene mutation
  • Coincidental renal, hepatic, active thyroid disease, restrictive or obstructive lung disease, other neuromuscular disease, or heart disease
  • Chronic, non-congestive, angle-closure glaucoma
  • Use of any of the following medications for reasons other than treatment of periodic paralysis: diuretics, antiarrhythmics, corticosteroids, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics, magnesium
  • History of life-threatening episodes of respiratory muscle weakness or cardiac arrhythmias during attacks
  • Pregnancy
  • Known mutation in the alpha subunit of the sodium channel gene in hypokalemic periodic paralysis patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: HYP Dichlorphenamide
Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
  • Daranide
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
  • Daranide
Placebo Comparator: HYP Placebo
Hyperkalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
  • Daranide
Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet
Active Comparator: HOP Dichlorphenamide
Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Dichlorphenamide for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
  • Daranide
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
  • Daranide
Placebo Comparator: HOP Placebo
Hypokalemic participants were randomized to Placebo for a 9 week double-blind phase. All participants then received Dichlorphenamide for a 52 week open-label phase.
50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day
Other Names:
  • Daranide
Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HYP Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HYP participants.
8 weeks
HOP Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HOP participants.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
HYP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
8 weeks
HOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
HOP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.
8 weeks
HYP Attack Duration
Time Frame: 8 weeks
HYP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
8 weeks
HOP Attack Duration
Time Frame: 8 weeks
HOP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.
8 weeks
HYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening
Time Frame: 0-9 weeks
Increase in attack frequency or severity in HYP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
0-9 weeks
HOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening
Time Frame: 0-9 weeks
Increase in attack frequency or severity in HOP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.
0-9 weeks
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength.

The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.

Baseline and 9 weeks
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength.

The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.

Baseline and 9 weeks
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome.

The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Baseline and 9 weeks
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome.

The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Baseline and 9 weeks
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome.

The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Baseline and 9 weeks
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome.

The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

Baseline and 9 weeks
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
Baseline and 9 weeks
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
Baseline and 9 weeks
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP,BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
Baseline and 9 weeks
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP, BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
Baseline and 9 weeks
HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
Baseline and 9 weeks
HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 weeks
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.
Baseline and 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert C. Griggs, M.D., University of Rochester
  • Principal Investigator: Rabi Tawil, M.D., Co-Principal Investigator, University of Rochester
  • Michael McDermott, Ph.D., Biostatistician, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis

Clinical Trials on Dichlorphenamide (double-blind)

3
Subscribe