Thoracic Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Aneurysm of the Descending Thoracic Aortic

July 26, 2017 updated by: W.L.Gore & Associates

An Evaluation of the GORE Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis for the Primary Treatment of Aneurysm of the Descending Thoracic Aortic

To assess the safety and efficacy of the GORE Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis in the primary treatment of aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA)

> Primary Hypothesis: The proportion of subjects free from a major device event through 1 month post-treatment will not be significantly less than 0.95, which represents the proportion observed in previous clinical studies with the GORE TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:>

1. Presence of DTA aneurysm deemed to warrant surgical repair >

  • Fusiform (≥50 mm), or >
  • Saccular (no diameter criteria)> 2. Subject is > 21 years of age> 3. Proximal and distal landing zone length ≥ 2.0 cm >
  • Landing zones must be in native aorta>
  • Landing zone may include left subclavian artery, if necessary> 4. All proximal and distal landing zone inner diameters are between 16-42 mm>
  • Diameter assessed by flow lumen and thrombus, if present; calcium excluded> 5. Life expectancy > 2 years> 6. Able to tolerate thoracotomy > 7. Male or infertile female> 8. Able to comply with protocol requirements including following-up> 9. Signed informed consent>

Exclusion Criteria:>

  1. Differing proximal and distal neck diameters (aortic taper) outside the intended aortic diameter requirements (sizing guide) for a single endoprosthesis diameter and the inability to use devices of different diameters (in adherence to the sizing guide) to compensate for the taper>
  2. Tortuous or stenotic iliac and/or femoral arteries and inability to use a conduit for vascular access>
  3. Aneurysmal, dissected, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed landing zone(s)>
  4. Mycotic aneurysm>
  5. Hemodynamically unstable aneurysm rupture>
  6. Aortic dissection>
  7. Planned coverage of left carotid or celiac arteries with the CTAG Device>
  8. Planned concomitant surgical procedure (other than left subclavian transposition and wireless sac pressure monitoring), or major surgery within 30 days of treatment date>
  9. Known degenerative connective tissue disease, e.g. Marfan or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome>
  10. Known history of drug abuse>
  11. ASA risk classification = V (moribund patient not expected to live 24 hours with or without operation)>
  12. NYHA class IV >
  13. Participating in another investigational device or drug study within 1 year of treatment>
  14. Subject has known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials>
  15. Subject has a systemic infection and may be at increased risk of endovascular graft infection>

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GORE CTAG Device
The primary endpoint of this study is freedom from a Major Device Event (MDE) through 1 month post-treatment in subjects treated with the GORE® Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis.
Endovascular aortic stent-graft
Other Names:
  • GORE Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Number of Subjects Free From a Major Device Event Through 1 Month Post-treatment
Time Frame: Treatment through 1 month post treatment
Treatment through 1 month post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Subjects Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event Through One Month Post Treatment.
Time Frame: Treatment through 1 month post procedure
Treatment through 1 month post procedure
Procedure Time (Minutes)
Time Frame: Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization
Total time in minutes required for surgical device implantation.
Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization
Operative Blood Loss (mL)
Time Frame: Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization
Blood loss in mL during initial device implantation procedure
Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization
Days of Convalescence Stay in an Intensive Care Unit
Time Frame: During the Index Hospitalization
Convalescence stay (days) in an Intensive Care Unit during the initial hospitalization for the device implantation
During the Index Hospitalization
Total Length of Hospital Stay (Days)
Time Frame: Total Duration of the Index Hospitalization
Total days of hospital stay during the initial hospitalization for implantation of device
Total Duration of the Index Hospitalization
Time in Days to Return to Normal Daily Activities
Time Frame: Average time within one month window
This is the self reported time (in days) that the subject returned to pre-operative activities and is not a time to event analysis.
Average time within one month window
Procedural Survival
Time Frame: Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization
Subjects who survived the index procedure
Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
Time Frame: Initial Device Implant Index Hospitalization
Subjects admitted to ICU during index hospitalization
Initial Device Implant Index Hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William D Jordan, Dr., University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

January 6, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TAG 08-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe