Comparison of Infection Rates Among Patients Using Two Catheter Access Devices

November 19, 2013 updated by: Jesse Thomas Jacob, Emory University

Comparison of a Novel Silver-Coated Catheter Access Device and a Standard Catheter Access Device: A Dual Center Cross-Over Study

Intravenous catheters are placed in nearly every hospitalized patient. These catheters, since they are breaks in skin integrity, are potential sources of infection that occur in the bloodstream. Bloodstream infections can result in higher rates of death and lengths of hospital stay, as well as increase healthcare costs. Blood is drawn or medications delivered through a catheter access device attached to the catheter. In looking at new ways to decrease infections associated with healthcare, the investigators plan to test whether the use of a silver-coated catheter access device (VLINK) compared to the standard, non-coated device (CLEARLINK) can reduce infection rates. These devices are identical in design other than the silver coating of the VLINK, that imparts a brown color to the device. Silver can prevent the growth of bacteria inside the device (biofilm formation) in the laboratory, but this has never been proven in patients.

The investigators propose to do a crossover study in two Emory-owned hospitals (Emory University Hospital and Emory University Hospital at Midtown), anticipated to last 10 months. Currently, both types of devices, (standard and silver-coated) are FDA approved for clinical use and are in use at both hospitals. The investigators plan to have each hospital use only one type of catheter access device for a period of time (approximately 5 months), and then switch ("crossover") to other type of device for the rest of the study. All patients admitted to either hospital (excluding newborns and patients with infections attributed to hemodialysis catheters) will be enrolled since both devices meet the standard of care. During the study, the infection prevention department, as a continuing part of their regular duties will measure infection rates. A small subset of catheters that are removed during routine clinical care (none will be taken out solely for the study) will be sent to CDC to determine the amount of bacteria inside catheters and catheter access devices (look for biofilm). Finally, the microbiology lab, again as part of its routine function will determine the rate at which blood cultures are falsely positive. All of these measures will be compared using statistical methods to see if there is a difference between the standard and silver-coated catheter access devices.

In undertaking this study, the investigators will be using a type of vascular access device (valve, not positive pressure) already in use in both hospitals and not changing the delivery of care to patients while, in a rigorous, systematic manner, obtaining samples and data for analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory University Hospital Midtown
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30033
        • Emory University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Nearly all hospitalized patients require some form of indwelling IV catheter as part of routine care, and approximately 20% of patient-days include central lines. All adult patients admitted to 2 Emory affiliated hospitals (Emory University Hospital and Emory University Hospital Midtown) during the study period will be included in the study population.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients admitted to the two participating hospitals.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Catheter-associated infections attributed to hemodialysis catheters.
  • Neonates and children.
  • Known silver allergy or hypersensitivity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Clearlink Arm, EUH
Standard catheter access device at Emory University Hospital
VLINK Arm, EUHM
Novel, silver-coated catheter access device at Emory University Hospital Midtown
Clearlink, EUM
Standard catheter access device at at Emory University Hospital Midtown
VLINK Arm, EUH
Novel, silver-coated catheter access device at Emory University Hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
central-line associated bloodstream infections rate per 1,000 central line-days
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
intravenous catheter related bloodstream infection rate per 1,000 patient-days
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
colony counts per device analyzed (biofilm analysis)
Time Frame: devices due to be changed at day 7
devices due to be changed at day 7
false positive blood culture rate
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James P Steinberg, MD, Emory University
  • Study Director: Jesse T Jacob, MD, Emory University
  • Study Director: Sheri Chernetsky Tejedor, MD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 21, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe