Validation of a Novel Sham Cervical Spinal Manipulation Procedure

November 16, 2010 updated by: Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Validation of a Novel Sham Cervical Spinal Manipulation Procedure.

Primary hypotheses:

Ho1: In chronic neck pain patients, randomly treated with either a "sham" or "real" cervical manipulation procedure, the probability of perceiving a Real Manipulation Procedure is equal to the probability of obtaining a Real Manipulation Procedure, AND, Ho2: Spinal tenderness will remain unchanged following the treatment procedure for both groups.

Secondary (null) hypotheses:

  1. Neck pain, cervical ranges of motion and paraspinal EMG responses to pressure pain will remain unchanged in both groups;
  2. there will be no differences between groups with respect to 2a) neck joint cavitations and 2b) forces across the cervical spine measured during the manoeuvres.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. Develop a randomized controlled clinical trial design to optimize the testing of the effects of a sham vs real cervical manipulation.
  2. Use novel modifications of both a sham a real manipulation to create "procedures" designed to optimize group equivalence in the RCT design. Then, evaluate the accuracy of 'patient post-treatment perception of treatment type' versus actual administered treatment (primary outcome #1).
  3. Quantitatively evaluate group differences in local soft-tissue tenderness by algometry (primary outcome #2), as well as changes in self-reported neck pain, ranges of motion, myoelectric responses in selected neck muscles and forces imparted during the procedures.
  4. Evaluate the occurrence of neck joint cavitation during the manoeuvres comprising these procedures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2H 3J1
        • Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants in this study will be consenting adults, 21-55 years of age, male or female who have chronic mechanical neck pain (NP) rated as between 30 and 65 on an NRS-101 scale [74]. For the purposes of this study NP is defined as;

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21-55 years old with chronic neck pain, Males/Females
  • Between 30-60 NRS 101 Scale
  • ≥ 4 weeks mechanical neck pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical Spine Surgery
  • Medically uncontrolled High Blood Pressure
  • Past History of Stroke
  • Upper Respiratory Infection within 4 weeks
  • Current Symptoms of Dizziness
  • Tinnitus, Blurred Vision, Vertigo, Sensory Motor Disturbance
  • Current use of anticoagulant therapy
  • Connective Tissue Disorder
  • Primary Fibromyalgia or myofascial pain
  • Metabolic/Neoplastic Bone Disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The perception by subjects as to whether they received a real treatment (YES/NO)
Time Frame: 10 mins
10 mins
Change scores of the pressure algometry
Time Frame: 10 mins
10 mins

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Current Neck Pain, Ranges of Motion, MES Response will be analysed by comparing baseline, 15-and 120-minute score
Time Frame: approximately 1 hours +
approximately 1 hours +

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Howard Vernon, BA, DC, PhD, FCCS, FCCRS, CMCC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2010

Last Verified

November 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 072155
  • 1R21AT004396-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Neck Pain

3
Subscribe