Improving Aspirin Use Among Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

February 16, 2011 updated by: Geisinger Clinic

Improving Implementation of the US Preventive Service Task Force Recommendation for Prophylactic Aspirin Use Among Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

The investigators' aim is to implement an intervention to increase aspirin prophylaxis use among patients that is patient initiated, optimizes use of physician and staff time, appropriately compensates staff, provides clinicians with tools necessary for managing aspiring prophylaxis, and ensures continuous management.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This intervention addresses a fundamental question of how clinicians need to be directly involved in motivating behavior change (i.e., aspirin prophylaxis). While complex behavior change likely demands high levels of involvement, a single simple action (aspirin prophylaxis) may not require such complex interactions.

We propose to compare the effectiveness of three models of care in a rigorous randomized controlled trial that will consist of a 3-arm, within-clinic design in which patients will be randomized to either the physician-initiated, the patient-initiated model, or to a control group in which usual care is delivered. In a patient-initiated model, patients are active participants in their own care and receive a pre-visit summary that contains an individualized risk assessment and patient education. In the physician-initiated model, patients receive the pre-visit summary and the physician uses a clinical decision support tool through the electronic health record that details the patient risk of CVD.

The specific aims of the proposed work are to compare the reliability and overall effectiveness of two different methods for motivating patients to take aspirin to prevent stroke and heart attacks as well as to develop a plan for translating the intervention into a process that is suitable for a paper-based clinic.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

884

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Lewistown, Pennsylvania, United States, 17044
        • Geisinger Clinic - Lewistown
      • Philipsburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 16866
        • Geisinger Clinic - Moshannon Valley
      • Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States, 18505
        • Geisinger Clinic - Lake Scranton

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with an appointment in the Geisinger clinic who:

  • are between the ages of 45-70 (male) or 50-70 (female), and
  • have one of the following risk factors:

    1. Smoke
    2. Direct LDL > 160 mg/dl
    3. HDL < 45 mg/dl (males) HDL < 35 mg/dl (females)
    4. Diabetes diagnosis
    5. Hypertension diagnosis
    6. CAD diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • > 70 years
  • Stomach Ulcer History
  • Aspirin Allergy
  • Anti-coagulation Therapy History
  • Clotting Disorder Diagnosis
  • Hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents such as Ibuprofen, Aleve, or Motrin
  • Hemorrhagic Stroke History
  • Current Aspirin use
  • 1st Outpatient Visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pre-visit Summary
Patients in this arm will receive a pre-visit summary prior to their appointment. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use.
The intervention is a pre-visit summary given to the patient prior to their appointment. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use.
Experimental: Clinical Decision Sharing Tool
Patients in this arm will receive a pre-visit summary prior to their appointment. They will also view a clinical decision sharing tool in conjunction with the physician in the office. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use. The clinical decision sharing tool informs the physician of the patient's heart attack or stroke risk and determines if the patient would benefit from aspirin use.
This intervention includes a pre-visit summary and a clinical decision sharing tool. Patients will receive a pre-visit summary prior to their appointment. They will also view a clinical decision sharing tool in conjunction with the physician in the office. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use. The clinical decision sharing tool informs the physician of the patient's heart attack or stroke risk and determines if the patient would benefit from aspirin use.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Aspirin Use At Two Week Follow-Up (Measures Taken at Baseline and Follow-Up)
Time Frame: Two Weeks
Two Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient Knowledge of Risks/Benefits of Aspirin
Time Frame: Two Weeks
Two Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nirav R Shah, MD, MPH, Geisinger Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2011

Last Verified

February 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2008-0264

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe