Impact of Armodafinil on Neurocognition and Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

August 6, 2013 updated by: University of Missouri, Kansas City

The Impact of Armodafinil on Neurocognition and Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: a Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Study

The investigation will involve a double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study examining the efficacy of armodafinil in improving neurocognitive functioning and reducing cognitive fatigue in MS. Patients who report MS-related cognitive difficulties and perform at least 1 standard deviation below the mean on a brief cognitive screen will be given a thorough neuropsychological evaluation at two time points. Half of the patients will be randomized to receive a single oral dose of lactose placebo prior to the first testing session. After a washout period of one week, they will then receive 250mg of armodafinil prior to a second testing session (P/A group). The other half of patients will be randomized to receive the active drug first. After a washout period of one week, they will receive the placebo prior to a second testing session (A/P group). As plasma levels of armodafinil peak between 2-4 hours after administration, participants will be asked to take a single 250mg capsule 2 hours prior to the scheduled testing sessions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • relapsing remitting and secondary progressive MS patients
  • between the ages of 18 and 60
  • report cognitive difficulties.
  • perform 1 sd or more below cut-off on cognitive screening measure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no history of alcohol/drug abuse or nervous system disorder other than MS
  • no sensory impairments that might interfere significantly with cognitive testing
  • no developmental history of learning disability or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
  • no medical condition other than MS that could substantially affect cognition
  • no relapse and/or corticosteroid use within four weeks of assessment;
  • no current use of modafinil, armodafinil or other psychostimulants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: armodafinil and placebo
All participants will receive one dose of armodafinil and one dose of placebo in a cross-over design
Half of the patients will be randomized to receive a single oral dose of placebo prior to the first testing session. After a washout period of one week, they will then receive 250mg of armodafinil prior to a second testing session (P/A group). The other half of patients will be randomized to receive the active drug first. After a washout period of one week, they will receive the placebo prior to a second testing session (A/P group). As plasma levels of armodafinil peak between 2-4 hours after administration, participants will be asked to take a single 250mg capsule 2 hours prior to the scheduled testing sessions.
Other Names:
  • NuVigil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Learning and Memory Measures.
Time Frame: Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.

Testing was completed after first intervention and again after second intervention.

Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores from derived by subtracting session 2 scores from session 1 scores.

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)- Measure of Verbal Learning (Min = 0; Max = 75).

RAVLT Delay - Measure of Delayed Verbal Recall (Min = 0; Max = 15).

Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT) Learning - Measure of Visual Learning (Min = 0; Max = 36).

BVMT Delay - Measure of Delayed Visual Recall (Min = 0; Max = 12).

Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.
CPT -Test of Information Processing Speed
Time Frame: Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.

Lower scores indicate better perforamnce. Scores from derived by subtracting session 2 scores from session 1 scores.

Continuous Performance Test (CPT) - Vigilance and reaction time.

Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.
Stroop
Time Frame: Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.
Stroop - Test of impulsivity (min = 0, max = none). Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores from derived by subtracting session 2 scores from session 1 scores.
Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.
Word Generation
Time Frame: Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.
Word Generation - Measure of verbal fluency. (Min = 0; No Max. )Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores from derived by subtracting session 2 scores from session 1 scores.
Outcome was assessed after each intervention (2 time points). Time 2 scores were subtracted from time 1 scores.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jared M Bruce, PhD, University of Missouri, Kansas City
  • Principal Investigator: Sharon Lynch, MD, University of Kansas Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe