Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Therapy for Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia

October 21, 2014 updated by: Bial - Portela C S.A.

Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2093) as Therapy for Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia: a Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as therapy for patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

567

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Men and women aged 18 years or older
  • Previous diagnosis of herpes zoster
  • Diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia and neuropathic pain present for more than 3 months after healing of the herpes zoster skin rash
  • Cooperation and willingness to complete all aspects of the study
  • Completion of at least 4 daily diaries during the week preceding randomisation
  • A minimum average daily pain score of 4 on the NRPS in the last 4 diary entries before randomisation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pain of other origin that might confound the assessment of neuropathic pain of postherpetic origin
  • Active herpes zoster lesion or dermatitis of any origin at the affected site
  • Subjects who had neurological ablation by block or neurosurgical intervention for control of pain
  • Significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorders
  • Drug or alcohol abuse in the preceding 2 years
  • Severe renal function impairment, as shown by calculated creatinine clearance values < 30 mL/min at screening
  • Relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities (e.g., Na+ <130 mmol/L, alanine (ALT) or aspartate (AST) transaminases >2.0 times the upper limit of the normal, white blood cell count (WBC) <2,500 cells/mm3)
  • Previous participation in any study with eslicarbazepine acetate
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • History of hypersensitivity to the investigational products or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
  • History of non-compliance
  • Likelihood of requiring treatment during the study period with drugs or other interventions not permitted by the clinical study protocol
  • Participation in a clinical study within 3 months prior to screening
  • Any clinical significant concomitant condition which might influence the assessments or conduct of the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
oral route
Experimental: ESL 400 mg twice-daily
Scored tablets
Other Names:
  • Zebinix
Experimental: ESL 800 mg once-daily
Scored tablets
Other Names:
  • Zebinix
Experimental: ESL 600 mg twice daily
Scored tablets
Other Names:
  • Zebinix
Experimental: ESL 1200 mg once daily
Scored tablets
Other Names:
  • Zebinix
Experimental: ESL 800 mg twice daily
Scored tablets
Other Names:
  • Zebinix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
Time Frame: baseline and 13 weeks

The primary efficacy variable will be based upon an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain, to be recorded in a patient's diary upon awakening each morning. This score should reflect the patient's mean pain over the previous 24 hours.

Please note that the change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain, i.e. the difference between endpoint mean pain and baseline mean pain, which are defined as follows:

  • Baseline mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain (NRPS) in the patient diary performed in the last 7 days before randomisation.
  • Endpoint mean pain is defined as the mean of the last four available ratings of average daily pain in the patient diary in the last 7 days of the treatment period.
baseline and 13 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint by Total Daily Dose
Time Frame: baseline and 13 weeks
Details of neuropathic pain, as recorded in a subject diary, were used for the primary assessment of analgesic efficacy. Subjects assessed their pain using an 11-point (0 "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain") NRPS upon awakening each morning and recorded the results in the subject diary. This score reflected the subject's mean pain over the previous 24 hours. Subjects were trained how to record their pain reliably. Investigators were trained in the subject's NRPS use during site initiation visits and at the investigators' meeting.
baseline and 13 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe