- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00981227
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Therapy for Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2093) as Therapy for Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia: a Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Written informed consent to participate in the study
- Men and women aged 18 years or older
- Previous diagnosis of herpes zoster
- Diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia and neuropathic pain present for more than 3 months after healing of the herpes zoster skin rash
- Cooperation and willingness to complete all aspects of the study
- Completion of at least 4 daily diaries during the week preceding randomisation
- A minimum average daily pain score of 4 on the NRPS in the last 4 diary entries before randomisation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pain of other origin that might confound the assessment of neuropathic pain of postherpetic origin
- Active herpes zoster lesion or dermatitis of any origin at the affected site
- Subjects who had neurological ablation by block or neurosurgical intervention for control of pain
- Significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorders
- Drug or alcohol abuse in the preceding 2 years
- Severe renal function impairment, as shown by calculated creatinine clearance values < 30 mL/min at screening
- Relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities (e.g., Na+ <130 mmol/L, alanine (ALT) or aspartate (AST) transaminases >2.0 times the upper limit of the normal, white blood cell count (WBC) <2,500 cells/mm3)
- Previous participation in any study with eslicarbazepine acetate
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- History of hypersensitivity to the investigational products or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
- History of non-compliance
- Likelihood of requiring treatment during the study period with drugs or other interventions not permitted by the clinical study protocol
- Participation in a clinical study within 3 months prior to screening
- Any clinical significant concomitant condition which might influence the assessments or conduct of the trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo
|
oral route
|
|
Experimental: ESL 400 mg twice-daily
|
Scored tablets
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: ESL 800 mg once-daily
|
Scored tablets
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: ESL 600 mg twice daily
|
Scored tablets
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: ESL 1200 mg once daily
|
Scored tablets
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: ESL 800 mg twice daily
|
Scored tablets
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
Time Frame: baseline and 13 weeks
|
The primary efficacy variable will be based upon an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain, to be recorded in a patient's diary upon awakening each morning. This score should reflect the patient's mean pain over the previous 24 hours. Please note that the change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain, i.e. the difference between endpoint mean pain and baseline mean pain, which are defined as follows:
|
baseline and 13 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean Pain (NRPS) From Baseline to Endpoint by Total Daily Dose
Time Frame: baseline and 13 weeks
|
Details of neuropathic pain, as recorded in a subject diary, were used for the primary assessment of analgesic efficacy.
Subjects assessed their pain using an 11-point (0 "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain") NRPS upon awakening each morning and recorded the results in the subject diary.
This score reflected the subject's mean pain over the previous 24 hours.
Subjects were trained how to record their pain reliably.
Investigators were trained in the subject's NRPS use during site initiation visits and at the investigators' meeting.
|
baseline and 13 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Neuralgia
- Neuralgia, Postherpetic
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anticonvulsants
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Eslicarbazepine acetate
Other Study ID Numbers
- BIA-2093-207
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.