Efficacy Study of Diathermy Cone Biopsy for the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Lesion

June 14, 2015 updated by: MJCamargo, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation

A Study of Two Cone Biopsy Techniques For Women With Cervical Pre-Invasive Disease. LLETZ Cone and SWETZ.

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether SWETZ (Straight Wire Excision of Transformation Zone) is a superior alternative to LLETZ cone (Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone cone biopsy) in the management of pre-invasive endocervical disease.

SWETZ is a new cone biopsy procedure performed with a straight wire electrode and it will be compared to LLETZ cone, which is performed with a large loop electrode.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The treatment of precancerous lesions hinges on the destruction, or more commonly, the excision of the cervical transformation zone . When the transformation zone contains squamous precancer and is completely ectocervical and therefore full visible, excision or destruction is an effective and relatively straightforward therapeutic entity. However in a small proportion of women a cone biopsy is necessary. A cone biopsy often requires the excision of 20-30 mms of endocervical canal.

Interventions.

  1. The standard procedure, LLETZ - cone (Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone cone biopsy), is performed with a large loop electrode of 20-25 mm depth. The activated loop was applied to the cervix outside the lateral margin of transformation zone and brought slowly to the controlateral margin with the objective to acquire 20-25 mm up the canal.
  2. The experimental intervention is SWETZ (Straight Wire Excision of Transformation Zone), a method of excision using a 1cm straight disposal of 0.20 wire to remove the endocervical transformation zone or glandular disease. The activated wire was used as a knife, fashioning a cone with desired dimensions.

This technique may be able to excise the endocervical transformation zone with a lower rate of morbidity and incomplete excision rate than LLETZ cone biopsy.

The hypothesis to be tested in this trial is that SWETZ is superior to LLETZ cone in the management of endocervical pre-invasive disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22250-020
        • Instituto Fernandes Figueira - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        • Instituto Fernandes Figueira

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Incompletely visible transformation zone in women with High grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL)
  • Suspicion of microinvasive carcinoma or occult invasive carcinoma
  • Suspicion of glandular disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Cervicitis were present
  • Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SWETZ
The intervention administered in this arm is the straight wire excision of the transformation zone, a electrosurgical method to perform a cone biopsy using a 1 cm straight wire of 0.20 mm wire. The activated wire is used in much the same way as a cold knife or laser beam fashioning the surgical specimen to achieve two centimeters cm at cervical canal..
Straight wire excision of transformation zone is a electrosurgical conization method,which uses a straight wire electrode as a knife to remove the dysplastic epithelium of the cervix.
Other Names:
  • NETZ - Needle Excision Of Transformation Zone
Active Comparator: LLETZ cone
The intervention administered in this arm is the large loop excision of transformation zone as a cone biopsy, performed using a large loop electrode of 2 cm depth, applied to the cervix to achieving two centimeters at cervical canal .
LLETZ cone is a electrosurgical conization method, which is performed with a large loop electrode of 20-25 mm depth. The loop is applied to the cervix outside the lateral margin of TZ and brought slowly to the controlateral TZ margin.
Other Names:
  • LEEP - Loop Electrosurgical Procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endocervical Margin Not Free of Disease.
Time Frame: 3 months after the surgery is performed.
Primary outcome is the number of participants with incomplete excision of dysplasia at the endocervical excision margin as recognized histologically.
3 months after the surgery is performed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Spent to Perform the Procedure
Time Frame: Time spent from randomization to complete the procedure
Time was recorded from insertion until removal of the vaginal speculum.
Time spent from randomization to complete the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: WALTER PRENDIVILLE, PhD, British Society of Colposcopy
  • Study Director: WALTER PRENDIVILLE, PhD, International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 1999

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe