Optical Coherence TomOgraphy Assessment of the Drug-Eluting Stent (OCTOBER)

November 12, 2009 updated by: Chinese PLA General Hospital

Optical Coherence TomOgraphy Assessment of the Excel Drug-Eluting Stent With BiodegradablE polymeR vs. the Cypher Drug-Eluting Stent With Permanent Polymer

BACKGROUND Treatment of coronary atherosclerotic disease has been significantly advanced by interventional cardiology, and the advent of coronary arterial stents. In comparison to angioplasty alone, stents have reduced the incidence of angiographic as well as clinical restenosis, the recurrence of angina, the need for coronary arterial bypass graft (CABG) surgery, repeat revascularization and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).However the long-term success of this therapy has been limited by the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. Despite the effectiveness of intracoronary stents in maintaining a larger luminal diameter, as compared to angioplasty alone, in-stent restenosis occurs within 6 to 9 months after stent placement in 15% to 35% of patients. While stents can reduce restenosis by blocking vascular recoil and remodeling, mechanical intervention alone has been incapable of treating this biological problem of neointimal hyperplasia, particularly in the subset of patients with diabetes, long lesions or small vessel disease.Drug-eluting stents (DES) were developed as a viable method for focused delivery of anti-restenosis compounds to target lesions for the reduction of restenosis. Of the DES available and with the results of up to six (6) years clinical follow-up, the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has become the current gold standard for stent implantation. With the advent of using DES to treat complex lesions such as longer lesions requiring the use of multiple stents and the use in bifurcation lesions, the risk of stent thrombosis has increase.Late stent thrombosis has also been reported following DES implantation.Long term treatment with dual anti-platelet therapy following stent implantation has become the solution used to counteract the risk of stent thrombosis, this solution does not come without it's own risks and is an expensive therapy. Another specific problem of DES is delayed endothelization, and this may be and attributing factor in prolonging the period of thrombotic risk as shown by pathological findings at autopsy following SES implantation. These examinations have shown that even after 16 months, neointimal healing is still incomplete with approximately 20% of stent struts being found uncovered. Questions have arose that the problems of late thrombosis and delayed endothelization of stent struts with DES could be the result of the permanent polymer that is used as the bonding agent for the anti-restenosis compounds to the stents.Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) along with angiography has been the techniques used to gain data on DES to this point. Angiography is a 2 dimensional tool that gives a view of the vessel and IVUS gives a more 3 dimensional view of the vessel. IVUS does have its limitations, as stent struts are reflectors of sonic waves, shadowing around and behind the struts occurs. IVUS is also limited in detecting malapposition of the struts to the vessel wall especially if the area between the vessel wall and the strut in very small.

RATIONALE Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an optical analogue of IVUS that uses an infrared light source and measures the backscatter of the light. With this technique a higher level of resolution compared with IVUS has been reported.OCT has been reported as being able to visualize and detect atherosclerotic plaques and assess more accurately strut malapposition and the presence or thickness of neointimal hyperplasia as compared to IVUS. With the question of delayed endothelization due to the permanent polymer being a probable risk for late stent thrombosis, it is felt that OCT post stent implantation may give a more accurate assessment of stent strut endothelial coverage.

This study is designed to compare the intimal hyperplasia following implantation of the Excel DES with a biodegradable polymer vs. the Cypher DES with a permanent polymer using OCT.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This study intends to enroll up to 100 patients from a single center in China. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion, Excel DES:Cypher DES.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 30 and 75 years.
  • Binary stenosis of > 70% in a de novo lesion in native coronary artery.
  • Reference lumen diameter proximal to the target lesion is 2.5 mm and < 4.0 mm.
  • Reference lesion length of < 30 mm.
  • The target lesioin can be covered with a makimum of two overlapping stents at a single lesion.
  • Written informed consent has been signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breast feeding woman.
  • Intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel (Plavix®), ticlopidine(Ticlid®), heparin, bivalirudin, stainless steel, contrast agent(that cannot be adequately premedicated), parylene, poly-lacticacid (PLA), or Biolimus A9 (or its analogues).
  • Lesion located in a protected or unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery.
  • STEMI within 72 hours prior to index procedure.
  • The patient has had another drug-eluting stent (DES) implanted within 12 months prior to the index procedure.
  • CCS Class III patients or the patient has a LVEF of < 40%.
  • Diffuse lesions of > 40 mm in length.
  • Renal impairment, with a serum creatinine of > 2.0 mg/dl.
  • Complicated anatomy such as Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO),Bifurcation Lesions (with side branch of > 2.5 mm) or Triple Vessel Disease (TVD).
  • Lesion cannot be pre-dilated successfully.
  • History of gastritis and/or bleeding history which will limit the usual dual anti-platelet regime.
  • Patient has a co-morbid condition(s) that could limit his/her ability to participate in the study, comply with follow-up requirements and impact the scientific integrity of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To quantitate the presence of neointimal stent strut coverage at 6 month via Optical Coherence Tomography follow-up.
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
1.Stent strut apposition at 6 month follow-up. 2. Neointimal thickness at 6 month follow-up. 3. late loss at 6 months 4. Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Time Frame: 12 month
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2009

Last Verified

November 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atherosclerosis

3
Subscribe