Comparison of the Success Rate of Two Approaches for Obturator Nerve Block in TURB (Conventional Pubic Approach [Labat Technique] and Inguinal Approach)

March 3, 2010 updated by: Yonsei University
The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of two approaches for obturator nerve block in TURB (conventional pubic approach [Labat technique] and inguinal approach.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled to undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor during combined spinal anesthesia and obturator nerve block were included in the clinical study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with advanced cardiac and respiratory insufficiency
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Preexisting neurologic deficits
  • Prior operation involving the hip and the inguinal region and bleeding tendency were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: conventional pubic approach
Procedure: obturator nerve block
EXPERIMENTAL: inguinal approach
Procedure: obturator nerve block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Assessment of obturator sign during using nerve stimulator and operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Yonsei University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 4, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2010

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4-2009-0137

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nerve Block

Clinical Trials on obturator nerve block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Turkmenistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe