Prospective Evaluation of NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) PEG "Rescue" (PEGRescue)

December 12, 2014 updated by: Jeffrey Marks, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Prospective Evaluation of NOTES PEG "Rescue"

The purpose of this study is to determine:

  1. Utility of urgent upper endoscopy in setting of dislodges (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) PEG tube.
  2. Feasibility of replacing naive PEG tubes with Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in lieu of traditional surgical methods.
  3. Efficacy of replacing naive PEG tubes with NOTES in lieu of traditional surgical methods.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. Utility of Urgent Upper Endoscopy in Setting of Naïve Dislodged PEG Tubes as defined by:

    • Percentage of Open vs. Closed Gastrotomy upon urgent endoscopy
    • Presence of Incidental Pathology noted on Endoscopy
    • Complications of Urgent Endoscopy
    • Time of Procedure
  2. Technical Feasibility of the NOTES procedure determined by:

    • Number of Successful/Failed PEG Placements
    • Number of Patients Requiring intra-operative conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopic procedure
    • Time to Complete Procedure
    • Presence or absence of post-procedural contrast extravasation on completion contrast radiographic study
  3. Efficacy of NOTES PEG Rescue compared to historical controls as characterized by the following post-operative criteria:

    • Number of Patients Requiring Subsequent Medical or Surgical Treatment for Intra-Abdominal Abscess
    • Number of Patients Requiring Subsequent Medical or Surgical Wound Infection within 30 post-op days
    • Post-Operative CT or Operative Findings consistent with abscess confirmed by culture positive drainage, aspiration
    • Intra-Operative or Post-Operative Red Blood Cell Transfusion
    • Length of Stay
    • Antibiotics > 24h Post-Op
    • 30 day Re-Admission
    • Mortality

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Case Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients must meet ALL of the following criteria

  • For prospective candidates, an initial attempt to pass a balloon tipped foley catheter through the external cutaneous tract into the stomach will be performed. It will then be followed by radiographic contrast study to evaluate for extravasation of contrast into the peritoneal cavity. If contrast is extravasated, this will be potential candidate for inclusion. If the foley catheter is unable to be passed through the cutaneous tract, that will also be considered someone for inclusion as this patient will still require an operative confirmation of the patency of the gastrotomy.
  • For retrospective candidates, intra-operative confirmation of dislodged tube as reported in the medical record.
  • The patient must demonstrate pre-operative hemodynamic and respiratory stability
  • No overwhelming medical co-morbidities prohibitive of surgery
  • Subject is 18 years of age or older
  • Subject or subject's legal decision-making proxy agrees to participate, fully understands and signs the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria: Patients must not meet ANY of the following criteria:

  • Esophageal stricture prohibiting passage of an endoscope
  • Any contraindication to surgery
  • Pregnancy or actively breastfeeding women
  • Evidence of active bowel obstruction
  • Synchronous acute abdominal pathology warranting incision-based surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NOTES PEG Rescue
A new way of performing surgery is called Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery, or NOTES, for short. NOTES may allow surgeons to perform abdominal surgery without any skin incisions. By using natural openings in the body, like the mouth, surgeons can enter the stomach with a tube instead of the traditional method of making an incision in the skin of the abdomen.
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) procedures involve transmural passage of flexible endoscopes introduced via a natural orifice whereby permitting access to the peritoneal cavity while avoiding skin incisions. No clear indication due to a number of physiologic, microbiologic, immunologic, and technical limitations. The concept of NOTES PEG "Rescue" in the setting of a dislodged naïve PEG tube may spare individual patients the physiologic stress of traditional surgery while concomitantly providing a natural segue to further study the NOTES platform in the human setting. PEG "Rescue" may represent a unique, practical, and empowering application of the burgeoning experience of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.
Other Names:
  • NOTES

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Successful Replacements of Dislodged PEG Tubes With NOTES Procedures in Lieu of Traditional Surgical Methods.
Time Frame: 30 day follow-up
Successful replacement will be determined via the number of patients requiring conversion from NOTES PEG rescue to conventional incision-based surgery.
30 day follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Marks, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 09-07-23

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery

Subscribe