Proton Radiotherapy Plus Sorafenib Versus Sorafenib for Patients With HCC Exceeding San Francisco Criteria (HCC)

September 21, 2021 updated by: Loma Linda University

Randomized Controlled Trial of Proton Beam Radiotherapy + Sorafenib vs. Sorafenib for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Exceeding San Francisco Criteria

This study is designed to determine whether proton beam radiotherapy plus Sorafenib compared to Sorafenib alone will produce the best results for treating patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients are candidates to receive both proton beam and sorafenib
  2. Patients with tumor burden that exceeds San Francisco criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are candidates for surgical resection
  2. Patients with tumor burden within Milan and/or San Francisco criteria
  3. Patients who have contraindication to receive proton
  4. Patients with contraindication to receive sorafenib including uncontrolled hypertension, coumadin treatment and prior intolerability to the drug
  5. Patients treated previously by any locoregional treatment
  6. Patients with prior liver transplant
  7. Patients with child class C
  8. Patients with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of > 25
  9. Patients with other comorbid diseases that may impact survival
  10. Patients with ongoing alcohol intake
  11. Patients with active sepsis
  12. Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within a week
  13. Patients unwilling to sign informed consent form
  14. Patients with history of noncompliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Proton Beam Radiotherapy plus Sorafenib
A combination of radiation therapy (proton) to kill tumor cells as well as Sorafenib which is a study drug administered to patients to stop tumor growth.
Fifteen consecutive sessions
400 mg po bid
Active Comparator: Sorafenib
Sorafenib is an oral pill taken daily to inhibit tumor growth at the cellular level.
400 mg po bid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival Rate Between Time of Consent and Time of Death
Time Frame: Change between time of informed consent and primary completion date of study, an average of 4 years per participant
All subjects are to be followed from time of consent until time of death. Subjects in both arms will require either a CT scan or MRI of the abdomen every three months to monitor tumor progression. Follow up imaging with be the same modality used at baseline (CT or MRI). All subjects are to be evaluated in the liver clinic 4 weeks after treatment and then every 3 months. Subjects in the Proton arm will require a CT or MRI 4-6 weeks after treatment and then every three months. Subjects receiving Proton therapy will also be followed in the radiation medicine clinic by their treating radiation oncologist every 3 months for the first year and then every 6 months.
Change between time of informed consent and primary completion date of study, an average of 4 years per participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael deVera, MD, Loma Linda University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Clinical Trials on Proton Beam Radiotherapy

3
Subscribe