PI or NNRTI as First-line Treatment of HIV in West Africa - the PIONA Trial (PIONA)

May 28, 2015 updated by: University of Aarhus

PI or NNRTI as First-line Treatment of HIV in a West African Population With Low Adherence - the PIONA Trial

BACKGROUND: Since 1996 the combination of three or more drugs has been the mainstay of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment. The most important types of drugs are called nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) Response to treatment is measured as increasing CD4+ cell count and decreasing HIV viral load. A major problem is the development of resistance. NNRTIs are recommended as part of first-line treatment of HIV in Africa but many Africans have a slower NNRTI clearance than Caucasians making them more susceptible for development of resistance in case of treatment interruptions. PIs might therefore be a better option in an African setting with low adherence.

AIM: To evaluate two different treatment regimens in HIV-1 infected patients:

A) A NNRTI (efavirenz/nevirapine) based regimen and B) A PI (ritonavir-boosted lopinavir) based regimen with regard to treatment outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment with a PI will be superior to treatment with a NNRTI due to less development of resistance.

METHODS: Treatment-naïve adult HIV-1 patients enrolled in an existing cohort The West African Retrovirus and Acquired Immune Deficiency (WARAID) cohort in Guinea Bissau with CD4+ cell count ≤ 350 cells/µL and/or clinical signs of immune suppression (World Health Organization (WHO) clinical stage 3 or 4) will be randomised 1:1 to: Treatment A: 2 NRTIs (lamivudine and either zidovudine or stavudine) and 1 NNRTI (efavirenz or nevirapine) or Treatment B: 2 NRTIs (same as in treatment A) and 1 PI (ritonavir-boosted lopinavir). Primary outcome: Viral load suppression <400 copies/ml 12 months after enrolment.

PERSPECTIVES: Guidelines for treatment of HIV in Africa are more or less a copy of the guidelines used in Europe and North America. Genetic differences in pharmacokinetics, more women infected in Africa and difficulties ensuring good adherence mean that results obtained from Caucasian patients are not directly transferrable to African patients. The results of this study will hopefully help guiding the treatment of HIV in Africa in the future. The investigators believe the HIV infected people in West Africa deserve the same evidence-based medicine as in developed countries.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bissau, Guinea-Bissau
        • Centro de Tratamento Ambulatoria do Hospital Nacional Simão Mendes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Antiretroviral treatment (ART) naïve HIV-1 infected patients. Women receiving ART during pregnancy can be included.
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • CD4+ cell count ≤ 350 cells/µL and/or
  • Clinical signs of immune suppression (WHO clinical stage 3 or 4) irrespective of CD4+ cell count.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tuberculosis (TB) treatment with rifampicin at the time of enrolment.
  • Co-infection with HIV-2.
  • Grade 3 or 4 alanine transaminase (ALAT) elevation (>5 times upper normal limit).
  • Patients with cerebral disturbances that complicates the ability to give informed consent or follow the treatment regime.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: NNRTI
2 NRTIs (lamivudine 150 mg "bis in die - twice a day" (BID) and either zidovudine 300 mg BID if hemoglobin is ≥ 8 g/L or stavudine 30 mg BID if hemoglobin is < 8 g/L) and 1 NNRTI (efavirenz 600 mg "omne in die - once daily" (OD) or nevirapine 200 mg OD for the first 2 weeks and after that 200 mg BID). Efavirenz will be used in all male patients according to national HIV guidelines. Pregnant patients and female patients with a child bearing potential will be treated with nevirapine if CD4+ cell count is ≤ 350 cells/mm3 with close monitoring of liver enzymes during the first 12 weeks in patients with CD4+ cell count >250 cells/mm3. Females beyond childbearing age will be treated with efavirenz.
Other Names:
  • Viramune
  • Sustiva
  • Stocrin
Active Comparator: Protease inhibitor
2 NRTIs (lamivudine 150 mg BID and either zidovudine 300 mg BID if hemoglobin is ≥ 8 g/L or stavudine 30 mg BID if hemoglobin is < 8 g/L) and 1 PI (ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 400/100 mg BID).
Other Names:
  • Kaletra
  • Aluvia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Fraction of patients with viral load suppression <400 copies/ml
Time Frame: 12 months after enrolment
12 months after enrolment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fraction of patients with viral load suppression <50 copies/ml
Time Frame: 12 months after enrolment
12 months after enrolment
Increment of CD4+ cell count of at least 100 cells/µL
Time Frame: 12 months after enrolment
12 months after enrolment
Development of ≥1 resistance mutations involving the treatment regimens used in patients with viral load >400 copies/ml
Time Frame: 12 months after enrolment
12 months after enrolment
Frequency of adverse events and severe adverse events
Time Frame: Within 12 months
Within 12 months
Compliance.
Time Frame: Within 12 months
Compliance defined as the actual amount of medicine taken compared to the planned amount for the same treatment period. A pill count is carried out at each visit.
Within 12 months
Incidence of tuberculosis.
Time Frame: Within 12 months
Within 12 months
Death.
Time Frame: Within 12 months
Death at 12 month follow-up. Any patient lost to follow-up will be attempted visited at home by a field assistant 1 month after latest visit due. Information on patient death from family or neighbors will be recorded as a mortality event and a verbal autopsy conducted.
Within 12 months
Weight
Time Frame: Within 12 months
Increase in body mass index (BMI) and frequency of severe weight loss (>10% of presumed or measured body weight).
Within 12 months
Plasma cytokine levels
Time Frame: Within 12 months
Within 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sanne Jespersen, MD, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
  • Study Director: Alex L Laursen, MD, DMSc, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
  • Study Director: Lars Oestergaard, Prof MD DMSc, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
  • Study Chair: Christian Wejse, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1

Clinical Trials on Efavirenz or Nevirapine

Subscribe