Supporting Patient Provider Communication in Paediatric Care (SiSom)

April 5, 2017 updated by: Cornelia Ruland, Oslo University Hospital

Supporting Patient Provider Communication for Children With Cancer and Congenital Heart Disease

Children with Cancer or congenital heart disease (CHD) experience complex, physical, psychosocial and behavioural symptoms and problems due to the illness, treatment, and medical procedures. To help children cope with their problems and prevent psychological distress, the investigators developed SiSom, a support system to help children with cancer or CHD report their symptoms and problems in an age-adjusted manner on a touch-pad, portable computer.

This quasi-experimental study with 202 children age 7-12 with CHD or cancer will test the following hypotheses: When children use SiSom to report their symptoms and problems, and this information is provided to their clinicians in their outpatient consultations:

  • Children and parents will experience less anxiety.
  • Children and parents will be more satisfied with the outpatient visit.
  • There will be greater congruence between children's reported symptoms and problems and those addressed by their clinicians as evidenced in documented patient care.

To better understand the mechanisms by which these effects may occur, the investigators will also explore:

  • Differences between control and experimental groups in patient-provider communication in terms of instrumental and affective behaviour, participation, initiative and person addressed;
  • The relationships among outcomes of patient-provider communication, congruence between patients' reported symptoms and those addressed by their clinicians and children's and parents' anxiety and satisfaction; and how these relationships differ between treatment and control conditions.

Finally, the investigators will investigate time requirements, ease of use and usefulness of SiSom by children and clinicians.

For analyses the investigators will use inferential statistics and qualitative analyses of the video-taped consultation sessions. This study will contribute to improving patient-centred care for a particularly vulnerable population, and to a better understanding of the triadic communication and interactions among child-parent and clinician.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0027
        • Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 7 and 12 years.
  • Ethnic norwegian.
  • Undergoing treatment for cancer or diagnosed with a congenital heart disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving or have received radiation the brain as this may affect their abilities to use SiSom and communicate during consultations.
  • Syndromes, mental retardation, developmental disorders, language disorders, or cognitive disorders that affect their ability to report symptoms or communicate during consultations.
  • Other ethnic origin.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Patients uses the symptom assessment tool SiSom. A summary of their reported symptoms are printed out and given to the pediatrician and nurse before the consultation. The consultation is videotaped.
SiSom is a symptom assessment tool designed to help the child report disease specific problems.The child also report the severity of their problems. After using the tool a report is printed and given to the clinician.
Other Names:
  • Symptom assessment tool
No Intervention: 2
The control group do not use the symptom assessment tool "SiSom" before the consultation. The control group receives usual care and the consultation is videoptaped.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient-provider communication
Time Frame: Single measure, video recording of medical consultation lasting approximately one hour
Single measure, video recording of medical consultation lasting approximately one hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient-provider communication
Time Frame: Single measure, video recording of medical consultation lasting approximately one hour
Single measure, video recording of medical consultation lasting approximately one hour
Time requirements, ease of use
Time Frame: Single measure, after collection of all patient data
Single measure, after collection of all patient data
Congruence between children's reported symptoms and problems and those addressed by their clinicians as evidenced in documented patient care.
Time Frame: Single measure, ten minutes post intervention
Single measure, ten minutes post intervention
State anxiety
Time Frame: 10 minutes pre and 10 minutes post intervention
10 minutes pre and 10 minutes post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cornelia M Ruland, PhD, Oslo University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Subscribe