Title: Comparative Effectiveness of Asthma Interventions Within an AHRQ PBRN

April 19, 2022 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Accelerating Implementation of Comparative Effectiveness Findings on Clinical and Delivery Systems by Leveraging AHRQ Networks

The overall goal is to identify best practices for improving health outcomes for patients with asthma using comparative effectiveness research within an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN). This goal will be achieved by completing the following aims: (1) Create a centralized database for comparative effectiveness research on asthma by combining clinical and billing data from one of the largest healthcare systems in the country (Carolinas Healthcare System) with data from the school system, Medicaid, and patient and community-level datasets; (2) Deploy a fully developed integrated approach to asthma management based on the Chronic Care Model; (3) Develop and implement a "shared decision making" approach for asthmatic patients from disadvantaged backgrounds; (4) Implement an electronic data collection system for an existing CDC funded school-based asthma intervention that will allow program evaluation and link school nurses with providers; (5) Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these three asthma management strategies on: overall healthcare consumption and medical costs; quality of life, school absenteeism and performance; asthma clinical measures; and medication utilization; and (6) Disseminate findings across the state via the statewide PBRN and other network partners. This project has the potential to impact over 30,000 asthma patients across the Carolinas including many patients from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1040

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • Department of Family Medicine
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • CMC Elizabeth Family Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

all with asthma diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group A - Usual Care Controls
Group A will consist of 20 primary care clinics who are part of the Carolinas Healthcare System network but have not yet adopted the Electronic Medical Record System. These practices do use the same billing databases as the remaining clinics, allowing easy identification of asthma patients and their health services utilization patterns. Data from the billing systems will be used to retrospectively populate a database for these clinics from January 2009 forward.
No EMR
Active Comparator: Group B - EMR Control Practices
There are currently 65 primary care practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System network that have electronic medical record with decision support (EAP)access at baseline. These practices will serve as a second level of control for comparison with the intervention groups. Each of these practices is currently using Cerner PowerChart and at the start of the study and will have access to the asthma decision support tools; an electronically generated Asthma Action Plan (AAP); and a built-in system of population management reports which will be pushed to the practices on an on-going basis to help in patient recall and management. The EAP approach to care has been developed with input from clinicians, hospital administrators, hospital information services personnel, and Cerner consultants.
Decision Support, Asthma Action Plans, and Population Management Reporting (EAP)
Active Comparator: C Integrated Approach to Care
There are 10 practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System (CHS) network that have already received additional training for improving outcomes for patients with chronic diseases termed the Integrated Approach to Care (IAC). This IAC approach developed by CHS is based on the Chronic Care Model (CCM). The IAC approach includes a heavy emphasis on the use of health information technology that practices receive during the initial EAP rollout.
Patients within the IAC group will also receive their own copy of an asthma action plan to allow for some degree of self-management support. In addition, IAC practices receive assistance from a practice coach trained in practice redesign and rapid cycle process improvement.
Active Comparator: Group D - Shared Decision Making (SDM)
This approach has great potential for improved patient outcomes and provides an additional step in the successful implementation of patient self-management. The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. In particular, the Shared decision making (SDM) intervention will be designed to be deployed within the 4 large clinics that care for the majority of the community's underserved and disadvantaged patients. The SDM intervention development will be overseen by the study advisory board and actively recruit providers from within the clinics for feedback about the intervention.
The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. The team will model this intervention on the randomized control trial performed by Dr. Sandra Wilson and colleagues within the Kaiser Permanente Clinics in California and Oregon
Active Comparator: School Based Care (SBC)
Activities included: spending individual time with students to assess, treat, and monitor and to educate students in proper asthma management; facilitate access to health care and medicine; and communicate with parents.
the research team will start an electronic data capture system linking school data and the clinical EMR (Cerner Power Chart) that will be implemented over the first year. Flow of data between schools and the hospital system will allow the children who have a regular source of care as well as those without a medical home to be treated with a unified asthma program by the school nurse and the hospital system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reducing Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease through healthcare system data.
2011-2013

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improving Adherence to Medication
Time Frame: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease.
2011-2013
Improve Quality of Life
Time Frame: 2011-2013
Measured via Survey
2011-2013
Reduced School Absenteeism
Time Frame: 2011-2013
measured with school absenteeism data
2011-2013
Improved Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 2011-2013
survey
2011-2013
Improved School Performance
Time Frame: 2011-2013
measured by yearly end of grade results
2011-2013

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael F Dulin, MD, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on usual care

3
Subscribe