Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Title: Comparative Effectiveness of Asthma Interventions Within an AHRQ PBRN

19 avril 2022 mis à jour par: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Accelerating Implementation of Comparative Effectiveness Findings on Clinical and Delivery Systems by Leveraging AHRQ Networks

The overall goal is to identify best practices for improving health outcomes for patients with asthma using comparative effectiveness research within an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN). This goal will be achieved by completing the following aims: (1) Create a centralized database for comparative effectiveness research on asthma by combining clinical and billing data from one of the largest healthcare systems in the country (Carolinas Healthcare System) with data from the school system, Medicaid, and patient and community-level datasets; (2) Deploy a fully developed integrated approach to asthma management based on the Chronic Care Model; (3) Develop and implement a "shared decision making" approach for asthmatic patients from disadvantaged backgrounds; (4) Implement an electronic data collection system for an existing CDC funded school-based asthma intervention that will allow program evaluation and link school nurses with providers; (5) Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these three asthma management strategies on: overall healthcare consumption and medical costs; quality of life, school absenteeism and performance; asthma clinical measures; and medication utilization; and (6) Disseminate findings across the state via the statewide PBRN and other network partners. This project has the potential to impact over 30,000 asthma patients across the Carolinas including many patients from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Aperçu de l'étude

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

1040

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, États-Unis, 28207
        • Department of Family Medicine
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, États-Unis, 28207
        • CMC Elizabeth Family Medicine

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

all with asthma diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur placebo: Group A - Usual Care Controls
Group A will consist of 20 primary care clinics who are part of the Carolinas Healthcare System network but have not yet adopted the Electronic Medical Record System. These practices do use the same billing databases as the remaining clinics, allowing easy identification of asthma patients and their health services utilization patterns. Data from the billing systems will be used to retrospectively populate a database for these clinics from January 2009 forward.
No EMR
Comparateur actif: Group B - EMR Control Practices
There are currently 65 primary care practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System network that have electronic medical record with decision support (EAP)access at baseline. These practices will serve as a second level of control for comparison with the intervention groups. Each of these practices is currently using Cerner PowerChart and at the start of the study and will have access to the asthma decision support tools; an electronically generated Asthma Action Plan (AAP); and a built-in system of population management reports which will be pushed to the practices on an on-going basis to help in patient recall and management. The EAP approach to care has been developed with input from clinicians, hospital administrators, hospital information services personnel, and Cerner consultants.
Decision Support, Asthma Action Plans, and Population Management Reporting (EAP)
Comparateur actif: C Integrated Approach to Care
There are 10 practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System (CHS) network that have already received additional training for improving outcomes for patients with chronic diseases termed the Integrated Approach to Care (IAC). This IAC approach developed by CHS is based on the Chronic Care Model (CCM). The IAC approach includes a heavy emphasis on the use of health information technology that practices receive during the initial EAP rollout.
Patients within the IAC group will also receive their own copy of an asthma action plan to allow for some degree of self-management support. In addition, IAC practices receive assistance from a practice coach trained in practice redesign and rapid cycle process improvement.
Comparateur actif: Group D - Shared Decision Making (SDM)
This approach has great potential for improved patient outcomes and provides an additional step in the successful implementation of patient self-management. The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. In particular, the Shared decision making (SDM) intervention will be designed to be deployed within the 4 large clinics that care for the majority of the community's underserved and disadvantaged patients. The SDM intervention development will be overseen by the study advisory board and actively recruit providers from within the clinics for feedback about the intervention.
The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. The team will model this intervention on the randomized control trial performed by Dr. Sandra Wilson and colleagues within the Kaiser Permanente Clinics in California and Oregon
Comparateur actif: School Based Care (SBC)
Activities included: spending individual time with students to assess, treat, and monitor and to educate students in proper asthma management; facilitate access to health care and medicine; and communicate with parents.
the research team will start an electronic data capture system linking school data and the clinical EMR (Cerner Power Chart) that will be implemented over the first year. Flow of data between schools and the hospital system will allow the children who have a regular source of care as well as those without a medical home to be treated with a unified asthma program by the school nurse and the hospital system.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Reducing Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits
Délai: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease through healthcare system data.
2011-2013

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Improving Adherence to Medication
Délai: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease.
2011-2013
Improve Quality of Life
Délai: 2011-2013
Measured via Survey
2011-2013
Reduced School Absenteeism
Délai: 2011-2013
measured with school absenteeism data
2011-2013
Improved Self-Efficacy
Délai: 2011-2013
survey
2011-2013
Improved School Performance
Délai: 2011-2013
measured by yearly end of grade results
2011-2013

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Michael F Dulin, MD, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 mars 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 août 2017

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 août 2017

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

19 janvier 2011

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

19 janvier 2011

Première publication (Estimation)

20 janvier 2011

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

25 avril 2022

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

19 avril 2022

Dernière vérification

1 février 2018

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur usual care

3
S'abonner