Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Title: Comparative Effectiveness of Asthma Interventions Within an AHRQ PBRN

19 aprile 2022 aggiornato da: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Accelerating Implementation of Comparative Effectiveness Findings on Clinical and Delivery Systems by Leveraging AHRQ Networks

The overall goal is to identify best practices for improving health outcomes for patients with asthma using comparative effectiveness research within an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN). This goal will be achieved by completing the following aims: (1) Create a centralized database for comparative effectiveness research on asthma by combining clinical and billing data from one of the largest healthcare systems in the country (Carolinas Healthcare System) with data from the school system, Medicaid, and patient and community-level datasets; (2) Deploy a fully developed integrated approach to asthma management based on the Chronic Care Model; (3) Develop and implement a "shared decision making" approach for asthmatic patients from disadvantaged backgrounds; (4) Implement an electronic data collection system for an existing CDC funded school-based asthma intervention that will allow program evaluation and link school nurses with providers; (5) Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these three asthma management strategies on: overall healthcare consumption and medical costs; quality of life, school absenteeism and performance; asthma clinical measures; and medication utilization; and (6) Disseminate findings across the state via the statewide PBRN and other network partners. This project has the potential to impact over 30,000 asthma patients across the Carolinas including many patients from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Panoramica dello studio

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

1040

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 28207
        • Department of Family Medicine
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 28207
        • CMC Elizabeth Family Medicine

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

all with asthma diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: Non randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione incrociata
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore placebo: Group A - Usual Care Controls
Group A will consist of 20 primary care clinics who are part of the Carolinas Healthcare System network but have not yet adopted the Electronic Medical Record System. These practices do use the same billing databases as the remaining clinics, allowing easy identification of asthma patients and their health services utilization patterns. Data from the billing systems will be used to retrospectively populate a database for these clinics from January 2009 forward.
No EMR
Comparatore attivo: Group B - EMR Control Practices
There are currently 65 primary care practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System network that have electronic medical record with decision support (EAP)access at baseline. These practices will serve as a second level of control for comparison with the intervention groups. Each of these practices is currently using Cerner PowerChart and at the start of the study and will have access to the asthma decision support tools; an electronically generated Asthma Action Plan (AAP); and a built-in system of population management reports which will be pushed to the practices on an on-going basis to help in patient recall and management. The EAP approach to care has been developed with input from clinicians, hospital administrators, hospital information services personnel, and Cerner consultants.
Decision Support, Asthma Action Plans, and Population Management Reporting (EAP)
Comparatore attivo: C Integrated Approach to Care
There are 10 practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System (CHS) network that have already received additional training for improving outcomes for patients with chronic diseases termed the Integrated Approach to Care (IAC). This IAC approach developed by CHS is based on the Chronic Care Model (CCM). The IAC approach includes a heavy emphasis on the use of health information technology that practices receive during the initial EAP rollout.
Patients within the IAC group will also receive their own copy of an asthma action plan to allow for some degree of self-management support. In addition, IAC practices receive assistance from a practice coach trained in practice redesign and rapid cycle process improvement.
Comparatore attivo: Group D - Shared Decision Making (SDM)
This approach has great potential for improved patient outcomes and provides an additional step in the successful implementation of patient self-management. The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. In particular, the Shared decision making (SDM) intervention will be designed to be deployed within the 4 large clinics that care for the majority of the community's underserved and disadvantaged patients. The SDM intervention development will be overseen by the study advisory board and actively recruit providers from within the clinics for feedback about the intervention.
The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. The team will model this intervention on the randomized control trial performed by Dr. Sandra Wilson and colleagues within the Kaiser Permanente Clinics in California and Oregon
Comparatore attivo: School Based Care (SBC)
Activities included: spending individual time with students to assess, treat, and monitor and to educate students in proper asthma management; facilitate access to health care and medicine; and communicate with parents.
the research team will start an electronic data capture system linking school data and the clinical EMR (Cerner Power Chart) that will be implemented over the first year. Flow of data between schools and the hospital system will allow the children who have a regular source of care as well as those without a medical home to be treated with a unified asthma program by the school nurse and the hospital system.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Reducing Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits
Lasso di tempo: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease through healthcare system data.
2011-2013

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Improving Adherence to Medication
Lasso di tempo: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease.
2011-2013
Improve Quality of Life
Lasso di tempo: 2011-2013
Measured via Survey
2011-2013
Reduced School Absenteeism
Lasso di tempo: 2011-2013
measured with school absenteeism data
2011-2013
Improved Self-Efficacy
Lasso di tempo: 2011-2013
survey
2011-2013
Improved School Performance
Lasso di tempo: 2011-2013
measured by yearly end of grade results
2011-2013

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Michael F Dulin, MD, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 marzo 2011

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 agosto 2017

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 agosto 2017

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

19 gennaio 2011

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

19 gennaio 2011

Primo Inserito (Stima)

20 gennaio 2011

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

25 aprile 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

19 aprile 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 febbraio 2018

Maggiori informazioni

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su usual care

Sottoscrivi