Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Title: Comparative Effectiveness of Asthma Interventions Within an AHRQ PBRN

19 april 2022 uppdaterad av: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Accelerating Implementation of Comparative Effectiveness Findings on Clinical and Delivery Systems by Leveraging AHRQ Networks

The overall goal is to identify best practices for improving health outcomes for patients with asthma using comparative effectiveness research within an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN). This goal will be achieved by completing the following aims: (1) Create a centralized database for comparative effectiveness research on asthma by combining clinical and billing data from one of the largest healthcare systems in the country (Carolinas Healthcare System) with data from the school system, Medicaid, and patient and community-level datasets; (2) Deploy a fully developed integrated approach to asthma management based on the Chronic Care Model; (3) Develop and implement a "shared decision making" approach for asthmatic patients from disadvantaged backgrounds; (4) Implement an electronic data collection system for an existing CDC funded school-based asthma intervention that will allow program evaluation and link school nurses with providers; (5) Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these three asthma management strategies on: overall healthcare consumption and medical costs; quality of life, school absenteeism and performance; asthma clinical measures; and medication utilization; and (6) Disseminate findings across the state via the statewide PBRN and other network partners. This project has the potential to impact over 30,000 asthma patients across the Carolinas including many patients from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

1040

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

  • Förenta staterna
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Förenta staterna, 28207
        • Department of Family Medicine
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Förenta staterna, 28207
        • CMC Elizabeth Family Medicine

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Barn
  • Vuxen
  • Äldre vuxen

Tar emot friska volontärer

Ja

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

all with asthma diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Hälsovårdsforskning
  • Tilldelning: Icke-randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Crossover tilldelning
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Placebo-jämförare: Group A - Usual Care Controls
Group A will consist of 20 primary care clinics who are part of the Carolinas Healthcare System network but have not yet adopted the Electronic Medical Record System. These practices do use the same billing databases as the remaining clinics, allowing easy identification of asthma patients and their health services utilization patterns. Data from the billing systems will be used to retrospectively populate a database for these clinics from January 2009 forward.
Övrig: usual care
No EMR
Aktiv komparator: Group B - EMR Control Practices
There are currently 65 primary care practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System network that have electronic medical record with decision support (EAP)access at baseline. These practices will serve as a second level of control for comparison with the intervention groups. Each of these practices is currently using Cerner PowerChart and at the start of the study and will have access to the asthma decision support tools; an electronically generated Asthma Action Plan (AAP); and a built-in system of population management reports which will be pushed to the practices on an on-going basis to help in patient recall and management. The EAP approach to care has been developed with input from clinicians, hospital administrators, hospital information services personnel, and Cerner consultants.
Beteende: electronic medical record
Decision Support, Asthma Action Plans, and Population Management Reporting (EAP)
Aktiv komparator: C Integrated Approach to Care
There are 10 practices within the Carolinas Healthcare System (CHS) network that have already received additional training for improving outcomes for patients with chronic diseases termed the Integrated Approach to Care (IAC). This IAC approach developed by CHS is based on the Chronic Care Model (CCM). The IAC approach includes a heavy emphasis on the use of health information technology that practices receive during the initial EAP rollout.
Övrig: Integrated Approach to Care
Patients within the IAC group will also receive their own copy of an asthma action plan to allow for some degree of self-management support. In addition, IAC practices receive assistance from a practice coach trained in practice redesign and rapid cycle process improvement.
Aktiv komparator: Group D - Shared Decision Making (SDM)
This approach has great potential for improved patient outcomes and provides an additional step in the successful implementation of patient self-management. The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. In particular, the Shared decision making (SDM) intervention will be designed to be deployed within the 4 large clinics that care for the majority of the community's underserved and disadvantaged patients. The SDM intervention development will be overseen by the study advisory board and actively recruit providers from within the clinics for feedback about the intervention.
Övrig: Shared Decision Making
The research team will develop the SDM intervention during the first 6 months of the study. The team will model this intervention on the randomized control trial performed by Dr. Sandra Wilson and colleagues within the Kaiser Permanente Clinics in California and Oregon
Aktiv komparator: School Based Care (SBC)
Activities included: spending individual time with students to assess, treat, and monitor and to educate students in proper asthma management; facilitate access to health care and medicine; and communicate with parents.
Övrig: school based care
the research team will start an electronic data capture system linking school data and the clinical EMR (Cerner Power Chart) that will be implemented over the first year. Flow of data between schools and the hospital system will allow the children who have a regular source of care as well as those without a medical home to be treated with a unified asthma program by the school nurse and the hospital system.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Reducing Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits
Tidsram: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease through healthcare system data.
2011-2013

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Improving Adherence to Medication
Tidsram: 2011-2013
Quality goals will be measured by the percentage of patients who reach the goal out of all patients identified with the disease.
2011-2013
Improve Quality of Life
Tidsram: 2011-2013
Measured via Survey
2011-2013
Reduced School Absenteeism
Tidsram: 2011-2013
measured with school absenteeism data
2011-2013
Improved Self-Efficacy
Tidsram: 2011-2013
survey
2011-2013
Improved School Performance
Tidsram: 2011-2013
measured by yearly end of grade results
2011-2013

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Michael F Dulin, MD, PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 mars 2011

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 augusti 2017

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

1 augusti 2017

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

19 januari 2011

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

19 januari 2011

Första postat (Uppskatta)

20 januari 2011

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

25 april 2022

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

19 april 2022

Senast verifierad

1 februari 2018

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • HS10-014

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Kliniska prövningar på usual care

Sök liknande försök

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Armenia

Betingelser

Sällsynta sjukdomar

Läkemedelsinterventioner

Kosttillskott

Sponsor / medarbetare

Platser

3
Prenumerera