A Comparison of Pain Severity on Injection of MCT/LCT Propofol Between Lidocaine 20 mg, 40 mg, and Without Lidocaine.

April 29, 2011 updated by: Prince of Songkla University
To compare the severity of pain on injection of MCT/LCT propofol with lidocaine 20 mg, 40 mg, and without lidocaine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Intravenous injection of propofol produces pain. Many factors are involved and various techniques have been tried to minimize the propofol-induce pain with variable results.

Objective: To compare the severity of pain on injection of MCT/LCT propofol with lidocaine 20 mg, 40 mg, and without lidocaine.

Design: Randomize controlled trial. Method: Two hundred and ten ASA class I - III patients undergoing elective surgery were blinded and equally allocated into 3 groups. Patients in group N, L1, and L2 received MCT/LCT propofol 10 ml mixed with 0.9% NaCl 2 ml, 1% lidocaine 2 ml, and 2% lidocaine 2 ml respectively. Pain at time of propofol injection was assessed by blinded anesthesiologist on a four point scale ; 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain. Results: Patient's demographic data of each group were similar. There were significant differences in the incidence of propofol injection without pain among groups (p<0.001). The numbers of patients who had moderate and severe pain in groups L1 and L2 were significantly less than those in group N (p<0.001). The mean blood pressure and heart rate were not significant differences in among groups. Conclusion : The amount of 20 mg, and 40 mg lidocaine to MCT/LCT propofol in our study is equally effective in decreasing pain and more effective than MCT/LCT propofol alone group significantly. They were no significant differences in hemodynamics change in among groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Songkhla
      • Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand, 90110
        • Songklanagarind Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA class I - III patients
  • undergoing elective surgery
  • age 18-75 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to propofol and lidocaine
  • abnormal liver and renal functions
  • has psychological problem or drug abuse
  • has recieved analgesic drug 2 weeks prior to surgery
  • risk of aspiration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lidocaine 20 mg
intravenous lidocaine
dosage 20 mg and 40 mg
Experimental: lidocaine 40 mg
intravenous lidocaine 40 mg
dosage 20 mg and 40 mg
Placebo Comparator: normal saline
2 ml
dosage 20 mg and 40 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain on injection
Time Frame: 30 minutes
4 points score for pain:o=no pain,1=mild pain,2=moderate pain,3=severe pain after propofol injection
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hemodynamic change
Time Frame: 30 minutes
blood pressure and heart rate after propofol injection
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 2, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adult Disease

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

Subscribe