Daily Checklists and Outcome in the Intensive Care Unit

November 5, 2012 updated by: Curtis Weiss, Northwestern University

Medical errors account for tens of thousands of deaths and tens of billions of dollars in healthcare costs in the United States every year. One field that has seen the strongest push toward quality improvement has been critical care medicine, likely because its particularly high degree of medical complexity makes it a practice area prone to high error rates with serious consequences. One of the most commonly used interventions used to help reduce errors in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been the implementation of checklists.

The investigators propose a clinical trial in a University critical care setting to determine whether an electronic checklist versus verbal prompting to use a written checklist improves clinical practice and patient outcomes. The investigators also plan to compare these data with a time period prior to the study to determine if the electronic checklist or verbal prompting are better than usual care. The investigators hypothesize that both the electronic checklist and verbal prompting to use a written checklist will be better for clinical practice and patient outcomes than usual care, and that verbal prompting will lead to better outcomes compared to the electronic checklist.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

451

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) team during the study timeframe

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transfer from MICU team to a separate ICU team within 12 hours of admission
  • Transfer to MICU team from a separate ICU team after more than 72 hours on the separate ICU team

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Electronic checklist
Electronic checklist for process of care issues implemented in our institution. Training on a regular basis of the electronic checklist arm to use the electronic checklist. Process of care issues on the electronic checklist include several that are under investigation: antibiotics and mechanical ventilation.
Experimental: Verbal prompting
Verbal prompting with written checklist
Prompting by study investigators of physicians on the verbal prompting arm. Prompting will include questions related to antibiotic utilization and mechanical ventilation weaning.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Empiric Antibiotic Duration
Time Frame: During intensive care unit admission, an average of 5 days per patient (although individual patients may vary)
During intensive care unit admission, an average of 5 days per patient (although individual patients may vary)
Proportion of Empiric Antibiotics
Time Frame: ICU admission
The difference between the electronic checklist and prompted groups' proportion of all antibiotics that were administered empirically (empiric/total antibiotics).
ICU admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Mortality
Time Frame: During hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks per patient (although individual patients may vary)
During hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks per patient (although individual patients may vary)
Length of Stay
Time Frame: During hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks per patient (although individual patients may vary)
During hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks per patient (although individual patients may vary)
Ventilator-free Days
Time Frame: During hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks per patient (although individual patients may vary)
Number of days within the first 28 days after ICU admission that a patient does not require mechanical ventilation.
During hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks per patient (although individual patients may vary)
Proportion of Successful Prompts
Time Frame: During ICU admission, an average of 5 days (although individual patients may vary)

Prompting group: number of patient-days that prompting led to empirical antibiotics being discontinued or narrowed/number of patient-days prompting occurred

Electronic checklist group: number of patient-days that electronic checklist led to empirical antibiotics being discontinued or narrowed/number of patient-days electronic checklist was completed

During ICU admission, an average of 5 days (although individual patients may vary)
Proportion of Patients-days on Which Empirical Antibiotics Were Used
Time Frame: ICU admission
Proportion of patients-days on which empirical antibiotics were used
ICU admission
Standardized Mortality Ratio
Time Frame: Hospital admission
Hospital admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Curtis H Weiss, MD, Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Electronic checklist

Subscribe