RAFF5 Proposal: Improve the Quality and Safety of Patients Seen in the Emergency Department for Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter (RAFF5)

November 24, 2023 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

RAFF5 Proposal: Project to Improve the Quality and Safety of the Immediate and Subsequent Care of Patients Seen in the Emergency Department With Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter

Acute atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL) are the most common arrhythmias requiring management in the emergency department (ED). They are characterized by sudden onset of a rapid heart rate which may be irregular (AF) or regular (AFL). Our focus is on episodes of acute AF or AFL which are usually less than 48 hours in duration and are highly symptomatic, requiring rapid treatment in the ED. Management guidelines for acute AF/AFL have changed substantially in recent years with several recent revisions published by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). The 2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist (CAEP Checklist) was very recently published to assist ED physicians in Canada and elsewhere manage patients who present to the ED with acute AF/AFL (Figure 1).

The overall goal of this project is to improve the quality and safety of the immediate and subsequent care of patients seen in the ED with acute AF and AFL by implementing the principles of the CAEP Checklist at both The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) EDs and by working with TOH cardiologists to provide rapid cardiology follow-up processes for patients discharged from the ED. The Investigators propose a before-after cohort study using an interrupted time series design to evaluate implementation involving 720 patients at the two TOH EDs over a 24-month period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1108

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients presenting to the emergency department with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) or Atrial Flutter (AFL).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • include all eligible patient visits to the participating EDs during the study period regardless of how they are managed.
  • include stable patients aged 18 and over,
  • presenting with an episode of acute AF or AFL of at least 3 hours duration,
  • where symptoms require ED management by rhythm or rate control.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The study will exclude patients who have any of:

    1. permanent AF;
    2. deemed unstable and required immediate electrical cardioversion; or
    3. primary presentation was for another condition rather than arrhythmia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Before Period
The before period (12 months) serves as the control period prior to implementation; data will be collected by health records review.
After Period
The after period (12 months) will be when patients are prospectively enrolled, and outcomes assessed.
. Our strategies will include a) selection of local physician champions from the ED and cardiology; b) discussion of the goals of the study with the local physician groups; c) formal introduction of the CAEP Checklist to the physicians and nurses by means of presentations at staff meetings, emails, and an online video; d) development of an action plan to address local barriers to implementation; e) creation of a free smartphone application; f) regular reminders; and g) and distribution of charts of site compliance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improve the quality and safety of ED management of AF and AFL
Time Frame: 14 day
the quality and safety of ED management based upon the CAEP Checklist management. best practices. The study team will use a score sheet which will identify specific managements for AF and AFL that are 1) optimal; 2) suboptimal; 3) unsafe.
14 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of cardioversion (chemical or electrical) in the ED
Time Frame: Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
use of rate control and the final heart rate at disposition
Time Frame: Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
prescription of OAC on discharge
Time Frame: Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
Whether or not they were given an outpatient prescription for oral anticoagulants in accordance with the 2021 CAEP Checklist
Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
consultations done in the ED by cardiology
Time Frame: Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
Whether or not the patient had an (unnecessary) consultation done in the ED by cardiology
Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
Adverse events attributable to medical management
Time Frame: Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.
adverse events including: i) conduction problems; ii) dysrhythmias; iii) hypotension requiring treatment; iv) respiratory events; f) admission to a hospital unit; and g) use of the rapid referral process.
Duration of the ED visit, approximately 4-12 hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ian Stiell, MD, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Plan to share data at the end of the study will be reviewed on a case by case basis.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Checklist implementation

3
Subscribe