- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01482442
SorAfenib Versus RADIOEMBOLIZATION in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SARAH)
January 13, 2017 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
A Prospective Randomized Open-labeled Trial Comparing RADIOEMBOLIZATION With Yttrium 90 Microspheres and Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
The purpose of this study is to determine whether RADIOEMBOLIZATION with 90 Yttrium microspheres is more effective on overall survival in advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with or without portal venous obstruction and no extrahepatic extension than sorafenib which is now the standard treatment of advanced HCC.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, sorafenib is now the standard treatment with an increased median overall survival but an overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events of 80%.
There is growing interest for RADIOEMBOLIZAION with 90 Yttrium microspheres.
It involves infusion of embolic microparticles of glass or resin impregnated with the isotope yttrium-90 through a catheter directly into the hepatic arteries.
A substantial number of open-label single-group studies showed supporting evidence for a potential efficacy on overall survival and acceptable or low toxicity.
Trial design: multicenter, prospective, controlled, open label randomized trial of Y90 RADIOEMBOLIZATION versus sorafenib.
Participants: Adult patients with 1) advanced HCC according to BCLC staging system (stage C) with or without portal vein thrombosis 2) ECOG performance status of 2 or less 3) adequate haematological, renal and hepatic functions 4) liver cirrhosis Child Pugh A - B7 and 5) no extrahepatic metastasis.
Interventions: In the sorafenib group, patients will receive continuous oral treatment with 400 mg of sorafenib twice daily.
In the Y90 RADIOEMBOLIZATION group, patients will first undergo angiography and scintigraphy for eligibility assessment (absence of or acceptable lung shunting) and preconditioning (embolization).
RADIOEMBOLIZATION therapy with infusion of Y90 microspheres will be performed secondly.
Objectives: The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of Y90 RADIOEMBOLIZATION to sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Secondary objectives include the comparison of safety profiles, quality of life and health care costs between the two therapeutic groups.
Outcomes: The primary endpoint is the median overall survival time.
Secondary endpoints include adverse events reported according to the NCI CTC, progression-free survival at 6 months, response rates, general and hepatic-specific quality of life scores, health care costs which comprise the MICROCOSTING of Y90 RADIOEMBOLIZATION from the viewpoint of the hospital and the full cost of each strategy.
Sample size: 400 participants (200 par arm).
The trial have 80% power to detect a clinically meaningful increase in median survival time of 4 months between sorafenib (expected median survival time 10.7 months) and Y90 RADIOEMBOLIZATION (expected median survival time 15 months) with a two-tailed type I error risk of 5%.
Randomization: 1 to 1 randomization will be stratified according to recruiting center, ECOG performance status (a score of 0 vs. a score of 1 or 2), presence or absence of macroscopic vascular invasion (obstruction of portal vein or any branch vs none) and previous chemoembolisation failure .
Randomly permuted blocks of random sizes will be used.
Study duration and Setting: Accrual period 24 months.
Additional follow-up period: 12 months.
14 centres involving both clinicians (hepatologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, and oncologists) and radiologists and Nuclear medicine physicians on each site.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
496
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amiens, France, 80054
- CHU Amiens #2
-
Angers, France, 49933
- CHU Angers #3
-
Besançon, France, 25030
- CHRU Besançon Hôpital Jean Minjoz #21
-
Bondy, France, 93140
- Hôpital Jean Verdier #25
-
Caen, France, 14033
- Hôpital Côte de Nacre #4
-
Clamart, France, 92140
- Hôpital Antoine Béclère #29
-
Clichy, France, 92110
- Hopital beaujon #1
-
Créteil, France, 94000
- Henri Mondor #24
-
Dijon, France, 21000
- CHU Dijon Hôpital Bocage #22
-
Grenoble, France, 38043
- CHU Grenoble #5
-
Lyon, France, 69003
- Hôpital Edouard Herriot #6
-
Lyon, France, 69004
- Lyon La croix Rousse #27
-
Marseille, France, 13009
- Institut Paoli Calmettes #7
-
Marseille, France, 13385
- CHU Marseille Hôpital La Timone #23
-
Montpellier, France, 34295
- Hôpital Saint Eloi #8
-
Nancy, France, 54511
- Hôpital de Brabois #9
-
Nantes, France, 44093
- Hotel Dieu #10
-
Nice, France, 06002
- Hôpital de L'Archet #11
-
Paris, France, 75908
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou #13
-
Pessac, France, 33604
- Hôpital Haut Leveque #14
-
Poitiers, France, 86021
- CHU Poitiers La Milétrie
-
Reims, France, 51100
- CHU Robert Debré #28
-
Saint-Priest en Jarez, France, 42270
- CHU Saint Etienne Hôpital Nord #17
-
Strasbourg, France, 67098
- Hôpital de Hautepierre #18
-
Villejuif, France, 94275
- Paul Brousse #19
-
Villejuif, France, 94805
- Institut Gustave Roussy #20
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histological or cytological diagnosis or meet the AASLD criteria for diagnosis of HCC and at least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable according to RECIST criteria by CT-scan or MRI
- Adult over 18 years old and estimated life expectancy over 3 months
- Patient with advanced HCC according to BCLC staging system (stage C) with or without portal vein thrombosis, not eligible for surgical resection, liver transplantation nor radiofrequency ablation OR patient with progression or recurrence of HCC after surgical or locoregional treatment not eligible for surgical resection, liver transplantation nor radiofrequency ablation OR patients in whom chemoembolisation has failed after two courses (patients who have received only one course of chemoembolisation are eligible if the failure of the first round shows that a second round will have no more impact; patients who have received more than two courses of chemoembolisation are still eligible if the arterial network is perfectly normal on a CT scan in the arterial phase). Failure is defined as the absence of an objective response after two courses of treatment in the treated nodule (objective response according to modified RECIST criteria and/or EASL criteria).
- ECOG performance status under or equals 1
- Adequate haematological function: Hb over or equals 9g/100mL, absolute neutrophil count over or equals 1 500/mm3, platelet count over or equals 50 000/mm3
- Adequate renal function; serum creatinine under 150μmol/L
- Bilirubin under or equals 50 µmol/L, AST or ALT uner or equals 5 x ULN, INR under or equals 1.5
- Liver cirrhosis Child Pugh A - B7
- written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Another primary tumour, with the exception of conventional basal cell carcinoma or superficial bladder neoplasia
- Extrahepatic metastasis
- Advanced HCC previously treated
- Advanced liver disease with Child-Pugh score over 7 or active gastrointestinal bleeding or encephalopathy or ascites refractory to diuretic therapy Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Allergy to contrast media
- Contraindication to hepatic artery catheterisation, such as severe peripheral vascular disease precluding catheterisation
- Psychiatric or other disorder likely to impact on informed consent
- Patient unable and/or unwilling to comply with treatment and study instructions
- Patient unable to swallow oral medications
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: sorafenib group
Patients will receive continuous oral treatment with 800 mg of sorafenib daily (Nexavar, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals-Onyx Pharmaceuticals).
Treatment interruptions and dose reductions (to 400 mg once daily) will be permitted for drug-related adverse effects.
At the discretion of the investigator, the dose may be re-escalated to after the resolution of the adverse event.
|
Patients will receive continuous oral treatment with 800 mg of sorafenib daily (Nexavar, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals-Onyx Pharmaceuticals).
Treatment interruptions and dose reductions (to 400 mg once daily) will be permitted for drug-related adverse effects.
At the discretion of the investigator, the dose may be re-escalated to after the resolution of the adverse event.
|
Active Comparator: radioembolization group
The first step will check patient eligibility and prepare conditioning by performing selective mesenteric and hepatic angiography (to document the arterial tumor supply and to occlude extrahepatic vessels) and 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy.
The second step is RADIOEMBOLIZATION therapy.
One to two weeks after patient eligibility and conditioning, treatment is performed with SIR-Sphere (SIRTEX Medical Ltd.,Lane Cove,Australia).
|
The first step will check patient eligibility and prepare conditioning by performing selective mesenteric and hepatic angiography (to document the arterial tumor supply and to occlude extrahepatic vessels) and 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy.
The second step is RADIOEMBOLIZATION therapy.
One to two weeks after patient eligibility and conditioning, treatment is performed with SIR-Sphere (SIRTEX Medical Ltd.,Lane Cove,Australia).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Median overall survival time
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Median overall survival time since randomisation
|
36 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Adverse events reported according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0
|
36 months
|
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: month 6
|
Progression-free survival at 6 months
|
month 6
|
Response rate
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Response rate (complete response, partial response, stable disease)
|
36 months
|
General and hepatic specific quality of life scores
Time Frame: 36 months
|
General and hepatic specific quality of life scores
|
36 months
|
Health care costs
Time Frame: 36 months
|
Health care costs which comprise 2 parts: 1) the microcosting of Y90 radioembolization from the viewpoint of the hospital and 2) the full cost of each strategy
|
36 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Valerie Vilgrain, PD, PhD, Department of Radiology
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Zarca K, Mimouni M, Pereira H, Chatellier G, Vilgrain V, Durand-Zaleski I; SARAH Trial Group. Cost-Utility Analysis of Transarterial Radioembolization With Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres Compared With Sorafenib in Locally Advanced and Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Ther. 2021 Jul;43(7):1201-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.04.018. Epub 2021 May 28.
- Hermann AL, Dieudonne A, Ronot M, Sanchez M, Pereira H, Chatellier G, Garin E, Castera L, Lebtahi R, Vilgrain V; SARAH Trial Group. Relationship of Tumor Radiation-absorbed Dose to Survival and Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization with 90Y in the SARAH Study. Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):673-684. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191606. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
- Vilgrain V, Pereira H, Assenat E, Guiu B, Ilonca AD, Pageaux GP, Sibert A, Bouattour M, Lebtahi R, Allaham W, Barraud H, Laurent V, Mathias E, Bronowicki JP, Tasu JP, Perdrisot R, Silvain C, Gerolami R, Mundler O, Seitz JF, Vidal V, Aube C, Oberti F, Couturier O, Brenot-Rossi I, Raoul JL, Sarran A, Costentin C, Itti E, Luciani A, Adam R, Lewin M, Samuel D, Ronot M, Dinut A, Castera L, Chatellier G; SARAH Trial Group. Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1624-1636. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30683-6. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
- Vilgrain V, Abdel-Rehim M, Sibert A, Ronot M, Lebtahi R, Castera L, Chatellier G; SARAH Trial Group. Radioembolisation with yttrium-90 microspheres versus sorafenib for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 3;15:474. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-474.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 29, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
November 30, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 16, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 13, 2017
Last Verified
January 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Adenocarcinoma
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Liver Diseases
- Liver Neoplasms
- Carcinoma
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Sorafenib
Other Study ID Numbers
- P101103
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Liver Carcinoma
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbActive, not recruitingHepatocellular Carcinoma | Hepatoma | Liver Cell Carcinoma | Liver Cancer, Adult | Liver Cell Carcinoma, AdultChile, Brazil, Argentina, China, Czechia, France, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey
-
Queen's Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedAdult Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Localized Resectable Adult Liver CarcinomaUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesTerminatedHepatocellular Carcinoma | Hepatoma | Liver Cell Carcinoma | Liver Cancer, Adult | Liver Cell Carcinoma, AdultUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedHepatocellular Carcinoma | Liver Tumor | Liver Cancer | Liver CarcinomaUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingStage IV Liver Cancer | Stage IVA Liver Cancer | Stage IVB Liver Cancer | Metastatic Liver CarcinomaUnited States
-
Lisa H. Butterfield, Ph.D.National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedHepatocellular Carcinoma | Liver Cancer | Cancer of Liver | Hepatoma | Hepatocellular Cancer | Hepatic Cancer | Liver Cell Carcinoma | Cancer, Hepatocellular | Liver Cancer, Adult | Liver Cell Carcinoma, Adult | Cancer of the Liver | Neoplasms, Liver | Hepatic Neoplasms | Neoplasms, HepaticUnited States
-
Albert Einstein College of MedicineNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedAdvanced Adult Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Localized Non-Resectable Adult Liver Carcinoma | Recurrent Adult Liver Carcinoma | Adult Hepatocellular CarcinomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedAdvanced Adult Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Localized Non-Resectable Adult Liver Carcinoma | Recurrent Adult Liver Carcinoma | Adult Hepatocellular CarcinomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedAdvanced Adult Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Localized Non-Resectable Adult Liver Carcinoma | Recurrent Adult Liver Carcinoma | Adult Hepatocellular CarcinomaUnited States
-
Arbutus Biopharma CorporationCompletedHepatocellular Carcinoma | Hepatoma | Liver Cancer, Adult | Liver Cell Carcinoma, AdultUnited States, Taiwan, Singapore, China, Canada, Korea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on sorafenib
-
BayerAmgenCompleted
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterBayerTerminated
-
Technical University of MunichCompleted
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteBayerCompletedMetastatic Colorectal CancerCanada
-
British Columbia Cancer AgencyWithdrawnLocally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck (SCCHN)Canada
-
Yiviva Inc.RecruitingAdvanced Hepatocellular CarcinomaUnited States, Taiwan, China, Hong Kong
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedNon-Small-Cell Lung CarcinomaUnited States
-
Accelerated Community Oncology Research NetworkBayerTerminatedRenal Cell CarcinomaUnited States
-
China Medical University HospitalUnknown
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...CompletedHepatocellular Carcinoma, Radiotherapy, SorafenibChina