Aspiration for Pain Relief Following Ankle Fracture

July 16, 2015 updated by: Stephen A. Sems, Mayo Clinic

Aspiration for Pain Relief Following Ankle Fracture: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

This trial will study the effect of hematoma aspiration in patients with acute ankle fractures.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • AO/OTA fracture classification 44
  • Closed fracture
  • Injury within 24 hours of presentation
  • Skeletally mature
  • Able to provide consent to participate in study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any concomitant injuries affecting Numerical Rating Scale
  • Soft tissue wounds at aspiration sites that compromise ability to aspirate
  • Patient not able to complete pain medication log
  • Patient not able to participate in follow up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Ankle aspiration
ankle aspiration
Ankle aspiration will be performed through either a standard anterolateral or anteromedial approach, depending on the conditions of the soft tissue. The anterolateral approach will be the preferred method due to the higher reproducibility of intra-articular needle placement. The anteromedial approach will be reserved for patients whose soft tissues over the anterolateral portal are compromised. Sterile preparation of the limb will be achieved with the use of chlorhexidine or Betadine. An 18 gauge needle will be introduced into the ankle joint and a syringe will be used to aspirate the ankle until no more hemarthrosis is able to be removed. The amount of hemarthrosis aspirated will be recorded. Following the procedure, care will continue as per standard of care.
Placebo Comparator: placebo procedure
Placebo ankle aspiration will be performed through a standard anterolateral. Sterile preparation of the limb will be achieved with the use of chlorhexidine or Betadine. An 18-gauge needle will be introduced into the skin. The needle will be held in the skin for 5-10 seconds in an effort to simulate the pain and time-lag experienced with aspiration. The needle will not pass the fascia or ankle joint capsule. Following the procedure, care will continue as per standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain as rated by numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in the emergency department and in the first 72 hours from the time of initial evaluation.
Time Frame: 6 months
Total amount of pain medication used in the first 72 hours from time of initial evaluation.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of volumetric increase of the injured ankle compared to the uninjured ankle.
Time Frame: 6 months
NRS scores after 72 hours through 6 months. 6 month SMFA scores. 6 month Olerud Molander scores.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Sems, MD, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 17, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-004187

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fracture

Clinical Trials on Ankle Aspiration

Subscribe