- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01484535
Aspiration for Pain Relief Following Ankle Fracture
July 16, 2015 updated by: Stephen A. Sems, Mayo Clinic
Aspiration for Pain Relief Following Ankle Fracture: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
This trial will study the effect of hematoma aspiration in patients with acute ankle fractures.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
130
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic in Rochester
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- AO/OTA fracture classification 44
- Closed fracture
- Injury within 24 hours of presentation
- Skeletally mature
- Able to provide consent to participate in study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any concomitant injuries affecting Numerical Rating Scale
- Soft tissue wounds at aspiration sites that compromise ability to aspirate
- Patient not able to complete pain medication log
- Patient not able to participate in follow up
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Ankle aspiration
ankle aspiration
|
Ankle aspiration will be performed through either a standard anterolateral or anteromedial approach, depending on the conditions of the soft tissue.
The anterolateral approach will be the preferred method due to the higher reproducibility of intra-articular needle placement.
The anteromedial approach will be reserved for patients whose soft tissues over the anterolateral portal are compromised.
Sterile preparation of the limb will be achieved with the use of chlorhexidine or Betadine.
An 18 gauge needle will be introduced into the ankle joint and a syringe will be used to aspirate the ankle until no more hemarthrosis is able to be removed.
The amount of hemarthrosis aspirated will be recorded.
Following the procedure, care will continue as per standard of care.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo procedure
|
Placebo ankle aspiration will be performed through a standard anterolateral.
Sterile preparation of the limb will be achieved with the use of chlorhexidine or Betadine.
An 18-gauge needle will be introduced into the skin.
The needle will be held in the skin for 5-10 seconds in an effort to simulate the pain and time-lag experienced with aspiration.
The needle will not pass the fascia or ankle joint capsule.
Following the procedure, care will continue as per standard of care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain as rated by numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in the emergency department and in the first 72 hours from the time of initial evaluation.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Total amount of pain medication used in the first 72 hours from time of initial evaluation.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of volumetric increase of the injured ankle compared to the uninjured ankle.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
NRS scores after 72 hours through 6 months.
6 month SMFA scores.
6 month Olerud Molander scores.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stephen Sems, MD, Mayo Clinic
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 1, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
December 2, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
July 17, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 16, 2015
Last Verified
July 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11-004187
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Fracture
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityRecruitingAnkle Fractures | Ankle Fracture - Lateral Malleolus | Syndesmotic Injuries | Ankle Fracture, Trimalleolar | Ankle Fracture, Bimalleolar | Fibula Fracture | Ankle Fracture - Medial Malleolus | Maisonneuve's FractureUnited States
-
Spital Limmattal SchlierenCompletedAnkle Fracture - Lateral Malleolus | Ankle Fracture, Trimalleolar | Ankle Fracture, BimalleolarSwitzerland
-
Ostfold Hospital TrustRecruitingAnkle Fracture, Trimalleolar | Ankle Fracture, BimalleolarNorway
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedAnkle Malleolus Fracture Bimalleolar | Fracture of Medial Malleolus | Fracture of AnkleNorway
-
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.University of UtahCompletedPilon Fracture | Calcaneus Fracture | Ankle Fracture | Talus FractureUnited States
-
University of UtahCompletedAnkle FractureUnited States
-
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustUnknown
-
Turku University HospitalTampere University of TechnologyCompleted
-
Rhode Island HospitalCompleted
-
University College CorkCork University HospitalCompletedAnkle Fracture - Lateral Malleolus | Rebound Pain | Ankle Fracture - Medial Malleolus | Ankle Fracture (bimalleolar Equivalent, Bimalleolar, or Trimalleolar)Ireland
Clinical Trials on Ankle Aspiration
-
Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical ResearchNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingOsteoarthritis (OA) | End-stage Ankle Arthritis (ESAA)United States
-
Synchro Motion LLCShirley Ryan AbilityLabCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle Fractures | Arthroscopic Surgery
-
Spaarne GasthuisCompletedAnkle Injuries | Acute Ankle Sprain | Ankle Ligament RuptureNetherlands
-
Barbara ŁysońCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingUltrasound Therapy; ComplicationsEgypt
-
Odense University HospitalZealand University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital; Sygehus LillebaeltNot yet recruitingPhysical Activity | Rehabilitation | Recovery | Ankle FractureDenmark
-
Georgia Institute of TechnologyEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityJohnson & Johnson; Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle SocietyActive, not recruiting